I was walking down a dock in Muskoka Ontario when I saw a woman I know sitting there reading Kjara of Gor, so I said to her, how would you like it if life was like it is in that book. She said, if men were like the men in this book, okay.
Feminism is lesbianism. It's as simple as that. Lesbians HATE Gor-style sexual dynamics when the participants are male and female because they're forced to witness the effect men have on women.
Forcing a lesbian to live in a world in which she sees the women she desires for herself be captivated - in any sense of the word- by men is an outrage lesbians cannot endure.
Feminism is lesbianism and lesbianism is sexual competition for women with men. Destroying the sexual relations between men and women, the desirability of each to the other, is the prime goal of feminism/lesbianism.
They want the market for women all to themselves.
Every individual of a sexually reproducing species feels itself to be in competition for mates with every other individual of that species. Feminism is a group strategy on the part of lesbians to undermine that group's eternal curse- its more successful competitor.
Always go back to basics whenever you have to think about an issue involving sex. Sex is about genes reproducing themselves. The choke-point for such reproduction is the female of the species. Sex is, therefore, about winning the war for exclusive access to females- even if the competitor is itself female and even if that competitor could not actually reproduce if they won. The logic of sexual competition is pre-conscious and hardwired into each of us. In that sense, lesbians don't know they're lesbians, i.e. sterile.
I will add that it is out of envy towards a phallus, since it symbolizes power. Lesbian feminism (since there is also corporate feminism which has different goals) is the expression of a woman, greedy for power but unable to attain due to her psychological structure, castrating men by buying dildos as to say “I don't need your phallus as I have my own!” However, it is not enough to own a dildo, she must use it against other women, to project her own powerlessness onto them.
I will use the expression “They finna make your daughter gay” whenever some moron tells me they are okay with their daughter being a lesbian because they think women are “safer” and “she doesn’t have to worry about unexpected pregnancy”
If you are a parent and do not wish to be a grandparent if at all possible you are really a pet owner who can’t fathom that your children are not dogs or cats.
Statistically, lesbian relationships have far higher rates of domestic abuse than those of straight and male homosexuals couples. Further, more and more studies are showing that, in hetero couples, women initiate the violence far more often than previously acknowledged. This is one of the lies of the Duluth model as it is constructed in such a way that it nearly requires a man be arrested for domestic violence, even in circumstances when he did no intimate the physical elements of the conflict. This is because men, being significantly stronger, are more likely to retaliate to physical violence in a way that produces a more significant physical mark. The Duluth model uses deliberately vague and fungible language in order to legitimize - and even mandate - the arrest of the man, even when he was acting solely in self defense.
Gay relationships are the most volatile ones. The abuse is incredibly disturbing and the fact that nobody talks about that is a sign that they act like the movie-trope evil manipulator type when they try to convince your children
Not 'gay relationships' as a whole. Lesbian relationships, specifically, show the highest rates of IPV. Gay men in relationships exhibit lower rates of IPV than both hetero and lesbian relationships.
This is an interesting take. It's kind of supported by the rantings of Audrey Hale, the female to male trans murderer of the Covensnt School shooting. Much of her diary was devoted to documenting what seems to be her unrequited live for some other woman who, it could be inferred, was uninterested, due to being straight. It might further be inferred that Audrey decided she needed to be a man in order to gain the affections of a straight woman. And, when that didn't work... We can see the results... The screeds Audrey Hale produced are, simultaneously, extraordinarily sad, unhinged, desperate and dark.
That's certainly true, but that also smacks of a 'not all irishmen' fallacy. Depending on the study, 50%-70% of lesbians identify as left-leaning snd/or democrat and, similarly, identify as feminist or orient around d feminist social and political priorities. There's significant overlap in that 3-part Venn diagram.
So initially I wanted to disagree with you, but as I sat back and thought about it, there is something to the feminine spirit, particularly in the west that seeks submission and domination. It is the only thing that explains affluent, woke, “educated” women who simp for Islam. I personally know several who have converted. They hate western men, and the “patriarchy” yet they converted. It makes no sense, unless you consider it in light of what you wrote about. It also factors into why “nice guys finish last” and why so many women return to abusive relationships. Deep down, if they were really honest, at some level, they want it. 🤷♂️
For decades I’ve been wondering why white women will happily be ordered around and told what to do by a swarthy husband, but not by a pale one. You see it every so often: the pale chick in a hijab following her husband around. The pale version of that guy would be “abusive”. It’s interesting
Yes interesting. It speaks of how there is - inside the head of many (perhaps most) of the 'progressive' middle class Left - a great jumble of undigested notions picked up from 50+ years of Leftist 'education' and 'legacy' mass media.
I mean, lots of guys are subs too. If you look at the kink scene, there's roughly equal numbers of male doms and female subs but many more male subs than female doms. (There are more male switches than female switches as well; as with most nerd stuff it's kind of a sausage party.)
That said you're definitely onto something. I think the whole kink thing is a way to launder these 'reactionary' desires through something 'transgressive' and therefore left-coded. You would not believe how many left-leaning women are into this stuff...though make sure to get lots of texts in case they turn on you!
You are not wrong. I noticed this years ago. I once had a relationship with a woman who considered herself a “kajira” and did the whole thing. I got into it. My wife has read a couple of the books and thinks that the sex stuff is hot and the “action” scenes are meh….
I don’t think all women are naturally submissive, but I think something like 3/4 of women are. Atleast sexually. Most ladies do want to assume a submissive position, and feel “dominated” but they seem to want to only give that submission to a man they feel to be “worthy” of it.
What they want is pleasure, and they have made the mistaken assumption that the only way to get there is through fear of violence and submission.
Fear is very close to sexual arousal, but it isn't actually the same.
A good analogy is rollercoasters. Even though we believe that they are safe, there is a primal instinct awakened in the body that is exciting and addictive.
But it is precisely because the roller coaster is not actually life threatening that it can be enjoyed.
If it was actually dangerous and injured people, very few people would still use it. Getting trapped on a roller coaster isn't exciting or fun, it is immensely boring and uncomfortable.
Getting your legs chopped off and spending your life in a wheelchair isn't exciting either.
The same is true of sex roleplay.
A truly dangerous, crazy rapist man who will trap and torture you isn't necessarily sexy at all.
Because there's no guarantee that he will be interesting, attractive, or that he will make you feel good. He could be crap at sex.
So what we have is the conflation of true danger with physical excitement and arousal.
And we can show their separation with the example of being poisoned.
Eating food that you didn't know was poisoned and getting sick is truly dangerous, yet not exciting or arousing at all.
It's the thought of muscles clashing and body parts rubbing together that excites the libido.
The physical chains represent the strength of the man's desire, which reflects how attractive and desirable she must be.
At the same time being a sex slave absolves the woman of any responsibility. She can't be a slut if she has no choice, and therefore she can be shame and guilt free as she indulges her lustful fantasies.
The problem is that a barbarian man is far more likely to encapsulate you, physically show you his desire by caressing you curves. A civilised man is more likely to treat you like a fruit machine of a car, working out when and which buttons to press to elicit the ‘right’ response.
Women know this- why else would romance fiction feature a collection of pirates, barbarian aliens, vampires and werewolves?
The barbarian struggles to control his passion, the civilised man has it locked up in a safe.
Yes, particularly the last bit. When you are brought up in a "nice girls don't" world, in a culture where your sexual apparatus is never named, certainly not looked at or fiddled with, it inevitably leads to internal conflict and angst. Within both sexes, I might add. Having responsibility removed while fun is had, who wouldn't like that?
I read a bunch of the Gor books when I was in my late teens. They were alright though I can't see how anyone could take them seriously. I assumed written by a nerdy teen as a revenge fantasy but turned out not. Ironically the author was rather a poor physical specimen himself, so wouldn't have done well in his own creation. I wonder what that tells us?
It is entirely possible to correctly observe a thing without being that thing. As. To the books the sleeve s and your correct observations about the taboos of the female sexual apparatus, I'd note that the original covers, thanks to the distinctive work of Boris Vallejo are as much about women who are as exceptional in terms of their feminine forms as the men are in their masculine form.
Making my way trough the first Gor book as i write. It's a lot of intellectual stuff at first, not really the power fantasy i was picturing. However, like Flashman, it's very masculine at hearth and that is very neeeded for today's youth. Is there any particular one in this Gor series that is more action/sex/offensive?
Also on female submission, i wrote a piece on how the politeness-zation of white society made girls crave the negro. I have unplished it for reasons i dont care to disclosure, but it was an interesting study. Woman don't really crave the bad boy, they crave real men, and white men used to be real men, much superior to the gangbanger negro, we conquered the entire world ffs.
The 19th century gentleman's conduct feminized us en masse. My moniker "the rake" is a play on "the gentleman" concept. In my first article i tried to argue the case for classy debauchery as a valid lifestyle.
Yes i did. And all of them i did. Do DM me if you feel like talking about Flashman, i absolutely love those books. I'm a 27 year old guy from Brazil, so this is even more unlikely, and no i didn't read any translations as there are none. George Mcdonald Fraser is an incredible writer.
I don't think the appeal of Islam for western women, or the appeal of a life cloistered and protected in general is the same thing as the appeal of a warrior slaver to his female captive. It is the 'arete' or virtue of her captor that awakens the womb-surrendering spark in a woman and brings her to the place where she can surrender her virtue. It is the female equivalent of his wild courage. The Islamic impulse in a woman is a desire to preserve her social position through submission to hierarchy. Real men will always want to tear down the harem, and real odalisques will always dream of escaping it in the strong arms of a Gorean slaver.
The world's largest bookstore will happily overnight you a giant pile of these "banned" books, but other than that they're very obscure and nearly impossible to find:
The Gorean Series was the first set of books I read that described war in its entirety, as well as how submissive women thought, at least in the series.
I've always wondered why women are so afraid of them, yet desire to read books like 50 shades of gray, a vastly inferior book.
Haven't read 50 shades, it was basically born of twilight fan/fap, right? Pretty tawdry provenance, but it clearly turns a lot of girls on. I'd say that's a result of the perverted desire for containment that so often goes unanswered in modern female existence. Men don't understand the difference between containment and violence, most of the time, and opt for either simping or brutality - they can't provide the firm but gentle hand. Gor is fantasy, not an instruction manual. It accentuates one dynamic between the sexes. In every heterosexual relationship there's a bit of the slave girl, and a bit of the slaver and for the relationship to work neither can be neglected.
Even Wikipedia will give you the order. The books are actually numbered; if you get the physical books they'll say the number in the series, and you can still buy them on Kindle.
OMG. I had an 11th grade teacher that loaned me all the Conan series to read and then loaned me Tarnsman of Gor and several more in that series. They were fantastic.
Pun aside, needing to overplay base desires into overelaborate fetishes is a pathology. BDSM is the feminine equivalent of a man who can only finish from depraved sex acts. Putting up with that for years drains
Oh, they're around most used bookstores. Used bookstores are great places to find books that have 'fallen from grace'. Got a whole bunch of E. Michael Jones at one that was closing. At the very least you can find stuff that tells you how people in the past thought, because it was written then.
As a dude once into the kink and online RPG scenes back in the late 90's and early aughts, I can only SUPER confirm how popular these were. I knew women trying to write up TTRPG rules, hosting boards and MUCKs, trying to recreate the lifestyle real-life...just everything. If you were a dude willing to roleplay a top online you had women (or as we were still joking about back then, people claiming to be women) *pestering* you for this shit. And if you were a dude who could stay fit enough to dodge a beer gut you would be pestered for RL encounters.
There were a huge number of paraphilia archives back then. Animal transformations seemed particularly popular, given the kink scene couldn’t really cater to a realistic fantasy on the subject.
I once read a quote in a novel which claimed that one of the seven secrets was that every human had an unrealistic, unachievable sexual desire.
Something tells me you might enjoy The Rosteval Saga, by yours truly: sword-and-sorcery fantasy, but in the author's opinion it could be described as sword-and-slave-girl fantasy. It's an action-packed fantasy adventure featuring a barbarian warrior-prince on a quest for glory and (of course) slave-girls, in a setting loosely based on the Aryan invasion of India.
I was walking down a dock in Muskoka Ontario when I saw a woman I know sitting there reading Kjara of Gor, so I said to her, how would you like it if life was like it is in that book. She said, if men were like the men in this book, okay.
Feminism is lesbianism. It's as simple as that. Lesbians HATE Gor-style sexual dynamics when the participants are male and female because they're forced to witness the effect men have on women.
Forcing a lesbian to live in a world in which she sees the women she desires for herself be captivated - in any sense of the word- by men is an outrage lesbians cannot endure.
Feminism is lesbianism and lesbianism is sexual competition for women with men. Destroying the sexual relations between men and women, the desirability of each to the other, is the prime goal of feminism/lesbianism.
They want the market for women all to themselves.
Every individual of a sexually reproducing species feels itself to be in competition for mates with every other individual of that species. Feminism is a group strategy on the part of lesbians to undermine that group's eternal curse- its more successful competitor.
Always go back to basics whenever you have to think about an issue involving sex. Sex is about genes reproducing themselves. The choke-point for such reproduction is the female of the species. Sex is, therefore, about winning the war for exclusive access to females- even if the competitor is itself female and even if that competitor could not actually reproduce if they won. The logic of sexual competition is pre-conscious and hardwired into each of us. In that sense, lesbians don't know they're lesbians, i.e. sterile.
That is an interesting yet compelling take
I will add that it is out of envy towards a phallus, since it symbolizes power. Lesbian feminism (since there is also corporate feminism which has different goals) is the expression of a woman, greedy for power but unable to attain due to her psychological structure, castrating men by buying dildos as to say “I don't need your phallus as I have my own!” However, it is not enough to own a dildo, she must use it against other women, to project her own powerlessness onto them.
Basically: They finna make your daughter gay
I will use the expression “They finna make your daughter gay” whenever some moron tells me they are okay with their daughter being a lesbian because they think women are “safer” and “she doesn’t have to worry about unexpected pregnancy”
If you are a parent and do not wish to be a grandparent if at all possible you are really a pet owner who can’t fathom that your children are not dogs or cats.
Statistically, lesbian relationships have far higher rates of domestic abuse than those of straight and male homosexuals couples. Further, more and more studies are showing that, in hetero couples, women initiate the violence far more often than previously acknowledged. This is one of the lies of the Duluth model as it is constructed in such a way that it nearly requires a man be arrested for domestic violence, even in circumstances when he did no intimate the physical elements of the conflict. This is because men, being significantly stronger, are more likely to retaliate to physical violence in a way that produces a more significant physical mark. The Duluth model uses deliberately vague and fungible language in order to legitimize - and even mandate - the arrest of the man, even when he was acting solely in self defense.
Well met!
Gay relationships are the most volatile ones. The abuse is incredibly disturbing and the fact that nobody talks about that is a sign that they act like the movie-trope evil manipulator type when they try to convince your children
Not 'gay relationships' as a whole. Lesbian relationships, specifically, show the highest rates of IPV. Gay men in relationships exhibit lower rates of IPV than both hetero and lesbian relationships.
The phallus is pretty much the opposite of a symbol for power, buddy. It's very exposed and sensitive.
Then lesbianism is very based and non-feminism is gay.
This is an interesting take. It's kind of supported by the rantings of Audrey Hale, the female to male trans murderer of the Covensnt School shooting. Much of her diary was devoted to documenting what seems to be her unrequited live for some other woman who, it could be inferred, was uninterested, due to being straight. It might further be inferred that Audrey decided she needed to be a man in order to gain the affections of a straight woman. And, when that didn't work... We can see the results... The screeds Audrey Hale produced are, simultaneously, extraordinarily sad, unhinged, desperate and dark.
not all lesbuans are either feminists or leftists
That's certainly true, but that also smacks of a 'not all irishmen' fallacy. Depending on the study, 50%-70% of lesbians identify as left-leaning snd/or democrat and, similarly, identify as feminist or orient around d feminist social and political priorities. There's significant overlap in that 3-part Venn diagram.
So initially I wanted to disagree with you, but as I sat back and thought about it, there is something to the feminine spirit, particularly in the west that seeks submission and domination. It is the only thing that explains affluent, woke, “educated” women who simp for Islam. I personally know several who have converted. They hate western men, and the “patriarchy” yet they converted. It makes no sense, unless you consider it in light of what you wrote about. It also factors into why “nice guys finish last” and why so many women return to abusive relationships. Deep down, if they were really honest, at some level, they want it. 🤷♂️
For decades I’ve been wondering why white women will happily be ordered around and told what to do by a swarthy husband, but not by a pale one. You see it every so often: the pale chick in a hijab following her husband around. The pale version of that guy would be “abusive”. It’s interesting
Yes interesting. It speaks of how there is - inside the head of many (perhaps most) of the 'progressive' middle class Left - a great jumble of undigested notions picked up from 50+ years of Leftist 'education' and 'legacy' mass media.
The midwives of Leftism since 1968 has been mindless rebelliousness and iconoclasm and its fruit has been anomie and rootlessness.
I mean, lots of guys are subs too. If you look at the kink scene, there's roughly equal numbers of male doms and female subs but many more male subs than female doms. (There are more male switches than female switches as well; as with most nerd stuff it's kind of a sausage party.)
That said you're definitely onto something. I think the whole kink thing is a way to launder these 'reactionary' desires through something 'transgressive' and therefore left-coded. You would not believe how many left-leaning women are into this stuff...though make sure to get lots of texts in case they turn on you!
You are not wrong. I noticed this years ago. I once had a relationship with a woman who considered herself a “kajira” and did the whole thing. I got into it. My wife has read a couple of the books and thinks that the sex stuff is hot and the “action” scenes are meh….
I don’t think all women are naturally submissive, but I think something like 3/4 of women are. Atleast sexually. Most ladies do want to assume a submissive position, and feel “dominated” but they seem to want to only give that submission to a man they feel to be “worthy” of it.
That may explain the current fad of bowing to Allah.
He's wrong, it isn't really true.
What they want is pleasure, and they have made the mistaken assumption that the only way to get there is through fear of violence and submission.
Fear is very close to sexual arousal, but it isn't actually the same.
A good analogy is rollercoasters. Even though we believe that they are safe, there is a primal instinct awakened in the body that is exciting and addictive.
But it is precisely because the roller coaster is not actually life threatening that it can be enjoyed.
If it was actually dangerous and injured people, very few people would still use it. Getting trapped on a roller coaster isn't exciting or fun, it is immensely boring and uncomfortable.
Getting your legs chopped off and spending your life in a wheelchair isn't exciting either.
The same is true of sex roleplay.
A truly dangerous, crazy rapist man who will trap and torture you isn't necessarily sexy at all.
Because there's no guarantee that he will be interesting, attractive, or that he will make you feel good. He could be crap at sex.
So what we have is the conflation of true danger with physical excitement and arousal.
And we can show their separation with the example of being poisoned.
Eating food that you didn't know was poisoned and getting sick is truly dangerous, yet not exciting or arousing at all.
It's the thought of muscles clashing and body parts rubbing together that excites the libido.
The physical chains represent the strength of the man's desire, which reflects how attractive and desirable she must be.
At the same time being a sex slave absolves the woman of any responsibility. She can't be a slut if she has no choice, and therefore she can be shame and guilt free as she indulges her lustful fantasies.
The problem is that a barbarian man is far more likely to encapsulate you, physically show you his desire by caressing you curves. A civilised man is more likely to treat you like a fruit machine of a car, working out when and which buttons to press to elicit the ‘right’ response.
Women know this- why else would romance fiction feature a collection of pirates, barbarian aliens, vampires and werewolves?
The barbarian struggles to control his passion, the civilised man has it locked up in a safe.
Yes, particularly the last bit. When you are brought up in a "nice girls don't" world, in a culture where your sexual apparatus is never named, certainly not looked at or fiddled with, it inevitably leads to internal conflict and angst. Within both sexes, I might add. Having responsibility removed while fun is had, who wouldn't like that?
I read a bunch of the Gor books when I was in my late teens. They were alright though I can't see how anyone could take them seriously. I assumed written by a nerdy teen as a revenge fantasy but turned out not. Ironically the author was rather a poor physical specimen himself, so wouldn't have done well in his own creation. I wonder what that tells us?
It is entirely possible to correctly observe a thing without being that thing. As. To the books the sleeve s and your correct observations about the taboos of the female sexual apparatus, I'd note that the original covers, thanks to the distinctive work of Boris Vallejo are as much about women who are as exceptional in terms of their feminine forms as the men are in their masculine form.
Good reply!
Making my way trough the first Gor book as i write. It's a lot of intellectual stuff at first, not really the power fantasy i was picturing. However, like Flashman, it's very masculine at hearth and that is very neeeded for today's youth. Is there any particular one in this Gor series that is more action/sex/offensive?
Also on female submission, i wrote a piece on how the politeness-zation of white society made girls crave the negro. I have unplished it for reasons i dont care to disclosure, but it was an interesting study. Woman don't really crave the bad boy, they crave real men, and white men used to be real men, much superior to the gangbanger negro, we conquered the entire world ffs.
The 19th century gentleman's conduct feminized us en masse. My moniker "the rake" is a play on "the gentleman" concept. In my first article i tried to argue the case for classy debauchery as a valid lifestyle.
Holy shit, have I found someone who's actually read the Flashman series?
Yes i did. And all of them i did. Do DM me if you feel like talking about Flashman, i absolutely love those books. I'm a 27 year old guy from Brazil, so this is even more unlikely, and no i didn't read any translations as there are none. George Mcdonald Fraser is an incredible writer.
I don't think the appeal of Islam for western women, or the appeal of a life cloistered and protected in general is the same thing as the appeal of a warrior slaver to his female captive. It is the 'arete' or virtue of her captor that awakens the womb-surrendering spark in a woman and brings her to the place where she can surrender her virtue. It is the female equivalent of his wild courage. The Islamic impulse in a woman is a desire to preserve her social position through submission to hierarchy. Real men will always want to tear down the harem, and real odalisques will always dream of escaping it in the strong arms of a Gorean slaver.
Do you have any links to pdfs of his books? And can you recommend an order or at the very least the best single book to get an idea of his writing
https://zlibrary-global.se/s/John%20Norman%20Gor
Domain been seized by Uncle Joe
Still accessible via TOR. Otherwise, https://annas-archive.org also scrapes it and other sources.
Works
Thanks a ton York
https://www.fantasticfiction.com/n/john-norman/gorean-saga/
Not exactly banned when they're all available on Amazon, and the first 17 are on Kindle Unlimited
Precisely.
The world's largest bookstore will happily overnight you a giant pile of these "banned" books, but other than that they're very obscure and nearly impossible to find:
https://www.amazon.com/s?k=gor+john+norman
Well, Amazon’s old unofficial motto was ‘customer ecstasy’…
Hahahahahahahaahha! Yeah, I got a very feminist girlfriend of mine a copy of the first Gor novel.
I don't think she read it though. How ungrateful!
Sounds like my current girlfriends Christmas gift this year haha
The Gorean Series was the first set of books I read that described war in its entirety, as well as how submissive women thought, at least in the series.
I've always wondered why women are so afraid of them, yet desire to read books like 50 shades of gray, a vastly inferior book.
> I've always wondered why women are so afraid of them, yet desire to read books like 50 shades of gray, a vastly inferior book.
For most women, because they were told the Gor books were low status, and being naturally submissive ...
Haven't read 50 shades, it was basically born of twilight fan/fap, right? Pretty tawdry provenance, but it clearly turns a lot of girls on. I'd say that's a result of the perverted desire for containment that so often goes unanswered in modern female existence. Men don't understand the difference between containment and violence, most of the time, and opt for either simping or brutality - they can't provide the firm but gentle hand. Gor is fantasy, not an instruction manual. It accentuates one dynamic between the sexes. In every heterosexual relationship there's a bit of the slave girl, and a bit of the slaver and for the relationship to work neither can be neglected.
In what order should they be read?
Even Wikipedia will give you the order. The books are actually numbered; if you get the physical books they'll say the number in the series, and you can still buy them on Kindle.
OMG. I had an 11th grade teacher that loaned me all the Conan series to read and then loaned me Tarnsman of Gor and several more in that series. They were fantastic.
You may think it’s a good idea to date a Gorean girl, but trust me, it’s not worth it.
Yeah, the kinky ones usually have issues. (Probably true of the men as well.) Overall I do not recommend.
Why not?
You have to kill so many men to keep her
Pun aside, needing to overplay base desires into overelaborate fetishes is a pathology. BDSM is the feminine equivalent of a man who can only finish from depraved sex acts. Putting up with that for years drains
I found like 12 of these novels at two of my local used book stores shortly after Kulak did a X thread on them.
Oh, they're around most used bookstores. Used bookstores are great places to find books that have 'fallen from grace'. Got a whole bunch of E. Michael Jones at one that was closing. At the very least you can find stuff that tells you how people in the past thought, because it was written then.
I just got to this great post.
As a dude once into the kink and online RPG scenes back in the late 90's and early aughts, I can only SUPER confirm how popular these were. I knew women trying to write up TTRPG rules, hosting boards and MUCKs, trying to recreate the lifestyle real-life...just everything. If you were a dude willing to roleplay a top online you had women (or as we were still joking about back then, people claiming to be women) *pestering* you for this shit. And if you were a dude who could stay fit enough to dodge a beer gut you would be pestered for RL encounters.
There were a huge number of paraphilia archives back then. Animal transformations seemed particularly popular, given the kink scene couldn’t really cater to a realistic fantasy on the subject.
I once read a quote in a novel which claimed that one of the seven secrets was that every human had an unrealistic, unachievable sexual desire.
Something tells me you might enjoy The Rosteval Saga, by yours truly: sword-and-sorcery fantasy, but in the author's opinion it could be described as sword-and-slave-girl fantasy. It's an action-packed fantasy adventure featuring a barbarian warrior-prince on a quest for glory and (of course) slave-girls, in a setting loosely based on the Aryan invasion of India.