The Banned Fantasy Novels Feminists Hate
Follow me on Twitter: @FromKulak
“The diamond band on the wrist of her naked arm gave her the most feminine of all aspects: the look of being chained.”
- Ayn Rand
On my "REAL Banned Book List", unlike Barnes and Noble's fake "banned" book tables, works of fiction very rarely appears.
School teachers might want children to believe short simple books readable by adolescents are "Banned" because Oooo👻 forbidden fruit, don't read the age appropriate short fiction the school librarian tells you to"..
But in reality 95+% of real banned books are non-fiction political tracts, censored histories, or terrorist manuals.
And the fiction books that are banned are usually fictionalized versions of those, works like "The Camp of the Saints", or "The Turner Diaries", despite their ability to move people emotionally are not banned for their emotional content but for their political content (and in the case of "The Turner Diaries" its accurate instructions on bomb making)
HOWEVER! There is one series that was driven from bookstores, and by the late 90s was almost totally disappeared based purely on the... "feelings"... it generated in its readers. A fantasy series set entirely on another world with more or less nothing to say about politics back on earth. It awakened... stirrings... in its readers so disturbing to the powers that be that it had to be stopped.
The Chronicles of GOR by John Norman (Pen-name of Philosophy Professor John Lange)
Begun in 1966 and continuing to... today (he's 92), the 38 book series is a Pulp Science Fantasy series in the vein of Edgar Rice Burroughs' "Barsoom" series (shout out to of )
It has a lot of neat fantasy/historical/military hypotheticals to get the young male mind going "what if Vikings raided Japanese samurai cities with flying monsters?" but the thing that outraged the feminists and what they'd never admit enraged them, was its effect on female readers.
Norman has a lot of theories about sex... theories which his millions of books sold suggest are very true. Theories which recent DNA discoveries have confirmed.
.
At SEVERAL points in the genetic record you and nearly everyone on earth, have approximately 17 female ancestors for every 1 male ancestor.
This was of course the result of patriarchal warfare, polygamy, and sexual slavery... The kind familiar to any readers of the Iliad.
Indeed Norman cites Homer, Freud, and Nietzsche as the primary influences on his philosophy.
But whereas this produced the ancient and then modern warfighting boys and young men idolize from the Iliad, through Rome, to the Mongols, to the adventures and conquests of early modern Europe. And who's feuds and daring consume half the plot of Norman's stories...
The real controversy is what it produced of the women.
Women are natural slaves Norman tells and, after a slow as could be introduction, shows. (the first half of the first book drags)
While these periods of slaving warfare between peoples and tribes produced modern technical, competent, highly coordinated and cooperative man... In women it produced natural slaves. Women who'd long for the chain, women who'd desire nothing so much as to be owned and to submit to a powerful violent man not of their choosing... women who'd never feel so """empowered""" as when they obey, and surrender the spirits, bodies, and wombs which they cannot defend. Who'd never feel so loved and wanted as when they are abused and distained.
This is the world and theory of mind Norman paints with a philosopher's attention to completeness... 38 books deconstructing and undoing not only modern feminist ideas of equality, but Christian ideas of the equality of the soul and nobility of the feminine spirit. By any standard maybe the most sexist misogynistic books ever written, not out of ignorance or resentment but a philosopher's indifference to any social or ethical preening that might impede the truth...
And women freaking loved it.
The millions of copies Norman sold were matched only by the number of panties he ruined. Women formed entire BDSM communities and tried to recreate the experiences and dynamics from the novels, something that enrages left wing mainline BDSM communities since unlike their focus on "consent" and "empowerment" these women wanted to lose control completely and in some extreme cases: permanently!
Women surrendering all authority over their bodies, finances, and social existence to their husbands on a 24/7 basis, they hoped, never to be returned... and what really offended the Left-BDSM types: they were openly claiming it was because they were lesser and that that was their role in existence. What they were born to be. All they could ever be.
Feminists reacted with perhaps the greatest display of Cope and Seethe in literary history.
Consummately refusing to acknowledge or accept that Norman's audience was well beyond 50% female (men read it for the war and there's tons of books on that) feminists started campaigns insisting that Norman's audience was entirely male abusers and misogynists. The few innocent readers: naive young impressionable boys who needed to be taught not to rape, but were being taught the opposite.
Of course Norman had merely written the type of violently sexual romances that had been staples of harlequin romances and women's lit for decades if not centuries... on paper he'd just made the war scenes more realistic and engaging… you know, aside from the fantasy fortresses and rideable giant birds.
But he did something 30s romance writers like Margaret Mitchell, and now tens of thousands of romance, erotica, and fanfic authors never did in all their sexy violent stories... Something the feminists could never forgive him for. Sandwiched between the fighting and the fornication, he explained with a philosopher's exactness WHY those stories are sexy.
Amidst the pulp adventures, wars on an alien worlds, and sexy slavery, Norman lays out a comprehensive theory of human sexuality utterly incompatible with feminism, "Democracy", equality, and possibly even Christian civilization.
He summoned the primordial lusts and hungers from the cruel ages of humanity into the hearts and souls of his readers, and he told them the names of those lusts such that they could never forget them, nor could they ever look upon the egalitarian world world around them with anything but boredom and disdain.
In short: It's pretty hot.
.
Read my other pieces from my banned book list here:
The Anarchonomicon REAL Banned Book List
Ideas are more dangerous than guns. We don’t let our enemies have guns. Why would we let them have ideas? -Joseph Stalin
Addendum: The Most Banned Book
Your name was removed from the registers, every record of everything you had ever done was wiped out, your one-time existence was denied and then forgotten. - George Orwell
Addendum, Real Banned Books List : The Bizarre Plausibility of Holocaust... "Revisionism"
It'd be as if you had to prove that between 6am and 10am on September 11th 2001, not only did thousands die from the planes hitting the building, but also there was a mass shooting going on in the upper floors of Trade Center 2 which killed dozens if not hundreds.
How would you prove that?
Follow me on Twitter: @FromKulak
Tip:
BITCOIN: bc1qdhj7637sgcssxgxygjaa3ddljwy8tzg5mzw325
MONERO: 8AhA3g9hbtDcAJE5MPmeQsFwwGsf3H9fq9tC6giQ4a6vKnTXv4J4MivKXrPKDpXyEeNc9mfFejbq84kSWkC8pjuj18rAEij
Follow me on Twitter: @FromKulak
I was walking down a dock in Muskoka Ontario when I saw a woman I know sitting there reading Kjara of Gor, so I said to her, how would you like it if life was like it is in that book. She said, if men were like the men in this book, okay.
Feminism is lesbianism. It's as simple as that. Lesbians HATE Gor-style sexual dynamics when the participants are male and female because they're forced to witness the effect men have on women.
Forcing a lesbian to live in a world in which she sees the women she desires for herself be captivated - in any sense of the word- by men is an outrage lesbians cannot endure.
Feminism is lesbianism and lesbianism is sexual competition for women with men. Destroying the sexual relations between men and women, the desirability of each to the other, is the prime goal of feminism/lesbianism.
They want the market for women all to themselves.
Every individual of a sexually reproducing species feels itself to be in competition for mates with every other individual of that species. Feminism is a group strategy on the part of lesbians to undermine that group's eternal curse- its more successful competitor.
Always go back to basics whenever you have to think about an issue involving sex. Sex is about genes reproducing themselves. The choke-point for such reproduction is the female of the species. Sex is, therefore, about winning the war for exclusive access to females- even if the competitor is itself female and even if that competitor could not actually reproduce if they won. The logic of sexual competition is pre-conscious and hardwired into each of us. In that sense, lesbians don't know they're lesbians, i.e. sterile.