Hear hear, I still think back to my time in infantry training and remember some of the truly impressive idiots we had (one guy literally did not know what the infantry did). They had some uses, but not many, and they weren't even terribly good as disposables. It's why most western militaries have moved away from conscripts to volunteers. It turns out war isn't just hard, it's complicated, and winning is difficult.
People are often surprised to find out that infantry has a much higher minimum ASVAB requirement than many Army jobs.
I always have to explain that low-IQ people can be trusted to do jobs that have a relatively low risk of collateral damage. Truck driver, cooks, laundry specialists, etc.
You can’t trust people with low processing capacity to make split second decisions with grenade launchers, machine guns, or even rifles. You can’t trust them to not get themselves killed quickly and easily by enemy forces.
Trouble is, these same western militaries did all they could to create a product no desirable volunteers want to buy. Yet the wizards of smart still think they can fight multiple wars against peer enemies with the current military. Draftee militaries provide a better cross section of the population, but good luck trying that nowadays.
EDIT - forgot to include perhaps the best example of why IQ matters in war. Operation Eland, in Rhodesia. 84 dudes in short shots wiped out 5000 communist trained and supplied guerrillas, without losing a single man. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Eland
How bad was his lack of knowledge about the infantry?
I would assume my idea of infantry ops is completely wrong since it's based on books and movies, was it that level of thing? Or not knowing they marched around with guns kind of thing?
A great article. The only 2 cents I can add is that as a former infantry and SF guy the range of things we had to know and be able to think through and act was damn near infinite. I always had contempt for the idiots who characterized us as cannon fodder. Those types wouldn't have lasted a day. And yeah, there were always dumb f...ks but that wasn't the norm. And that was before the "modern battlefield." Your comment about gamers is interesting. You do have to be able to do more than sit at a console for eight hours a day, like one young gamer told me he did. Of course, it's not as if I know anything about it because I don't.
Yes. The challenge would be whipping them into physical shape, but the nature of the problem solving (not the ranges or weapons details, vanishingly rarely are modern games accurate) but the mental exercise of visualizing space and tracking many different factors is very similar and appeals/selects for the same types of minds.
Which would seem obvious... the types of people attracted to simulations of conflict are the types of people who're mentally compatible with them.
that is the real challenge. I just question whether the raw material is there, even considering gamer interest and abilities. If someone wanted to play pretend military strategic or tactical conflict wouldn't they first want to get some real experience? But they don't, at least to my knowledge. Of course White boys aren't wanted and a D.I.E. CRT tranny and gay military aren't exactly incentives. I left in 2003 and some of that was creeping in which we ignored and laughed at. So I am obsolete.
There are about 250 million Americans who woke up today in a home with a gun, or several guns, in their place. The gooferment doesn't count people and things because when numbers get big they run out of fingers and toes. They also lie comprehensively. If they say it, it's a lie.
We outnumber them. We have other advantages. This is our territory. We know our ground.
It is not a matter of "if". The war is here.
The only remaining question is who is going to fight.
The tip of the hat 🎩 goes to L. Neil Smith. Essay he wrote about AD 2010 had the word gooferment and I liked it.
The declaration of independence says that government necessarily involves consent. It also says that those in power "have abdicated government, placed us out of [their] protection and make war on us."
It all "works" because of the consent of the governed.
It's quickly becoming evident to more people every day, that actions taken by government -- were never consented to. In fact, many were never even voted on by the people -- or even brought up as issues.
People have to keep their head on a swivel because events are happening rather quickly now. Stay frosty.
Thank you my friend. Yes, I withdrew my consent in 1993. I keep coming back to the declaration words: He has abdicated government, declared us out of his protection and makes war on us. These words fit our situation.
I think a lot is going to happen in the next two months, October and November. We are going to have to keep paying attention and making sure we have news sources that are legitimate unlike the television news
Well written and thanks, I learned something here.
I caution you to be careful about distilling intelligence down to a simple one-dimensional scale. The Haitians may test poorly for IQ but they know that in a conflict they must be brutal and ruthless. American kids will be reluctant to act ruthlessly. I don’t believe a simple civil war is coming…it’s more likely to be looting on a biblical scale. The Americans will be defending their homes and their daughters from an unorganized rabble. They key will be in being smart enough to organize your friends, not raw individual intelligence
.... I have doubts that cannibals who live in shacks are doing well intellectually; if you want to argue theres some people who the iq test is off by 15 points, maybe. But 30 points, and every historical metric? No, don't humor it, its a shit hole even compared to other 3rd world countries.
having spent a fair amount of time in haiti and a fair amount of time in other third world countries (I was called to task once for calling them 4th world countries, it was unbearable to someone) I completely agree with you. Haitians are no threat to much of anything except unarmed people.
Haitians ain't shit in combat. And IQ is what it is; the science is solid. Somalis are damned near as stupid as Haitiains; neither group is a serious problem militarily.
Andrew, I agree with you everything that you say here. My point is that Venezuelans and Haitians have a head start on the soft Americans, and we should not dismiss them as ‘stupid’
Haitians may be brutal and ruthless but 1) they can’t hide, and 2) they haven’t been up against the North American big game hunters and Veterans. They will only exist in history books afterwards.
Great article and a solid point. But the issue is that for this to work, these hypothetical Europeans would need to be organized into cohesive groups. The problem is, every institution has already been captured and weaponized against them, leaving them as disorganized individuals, no matter how clever, facing off against powerful, organized institutions.
I always push back on the organization angle... In major wars you've had entire regiments organized and kitted out and shipped to combat in a month.
A lot of people talk about organization as if it's this insurmountable problem when really the challenge of getting people together or FORMAL organizing is often best left to latest part of any action, since if you actually organize formally and have a name and are explicit about your thing you expose yourself to federal charges and being picked identified/picked off.
Its way better to just train with a few close friends and loosely network, and check up on each other and share knowledge, so that the actual formal organization can happen seamlessly and quickly at the moment of crisis... Should write a piece on it.
I’d definitely look forward to reading such an article. The other side of the coin, of course, is that a significant portion of the high-IQ but mercenary Europeans are currently alligned with the institutions—those just in it for the paycheck and pension. Still, I agree with your point about formal and informal organization. And Rhodesia was a perfect example of exactly what you’ve been talking about.
48 million Americans are presently classified as “Combat Capable,”
Approximately 30 million Americans own semi-automatic rifles, such as AR-15s.
14 million Americans are presently classified as “Combat Ready,” which means they consistently take part in tactical training courses, or do similar training, and demonstrate physical fitness and proficiency in handling firearms.
That indicates to me that 14 million American men that know what they're about can immediately get a combat buddy with a rifle, who will quickly learn what he's about, with 48 million more that a good portion of will be highly incentivized to in short order, obtain a rifle and learn what they're about.
That's why they've been doing such dumb shit for the past 20-30 years. They're trying to degrade the population b/c they know their opportunity window is shrinking to do something, anything, to stave off what's coming.
The allusion to gamers as being suited to the situational awareness and mental ability necessary to make effective soldiers is... interesting.
I remember when the original Halo came out it was very popular amongst many of my fellow brothers-in-arms. Halo tournaments were even somewhat officially supported and fire teams from various squads used to compete against one another at the recreation center for various prizes. They used the same small unit and MOUT tactics in the game that they used in real life, which was why it was so popular and somewhat officially sanctioned.
There is a demand begging to be filled for a hyper-realistic contemporary warfare simulator that would allow those who would be the patriots taking the fight to the Deep State in the coming civil war to meet together online in a virtual battlefield and practice various battle drills and small-unit tactics. Operations such as ambushes, using drones to provide surveillance and assist in attacks, guerilla tactics such as assassinations of local oppressors, or even targeting federal installations, etc.
The game could be based upon something similar to Google Maps or Street View, or some of the more advanced flight sims like the newest X Planes, and if it was networked it could allow hundreds or thousands of patriots to practice their actions against an AI controlled federal opponent. With the right software, treadmills could be integrated so that one could gear up and actually somewhat simulate the physical effort needed. Those laser training simulator cartridges people use to practice at home along with an appropriate screen could allow for more realistic marksmanship with the actual weapon owned by the patriot. This is something that could possibly be crowd funded, and would likely be immensely popular among the white male gamer demographic which would be the ideal raw material for actual soldiers.
From what I remember "full spectrum warrior" was developed for that purpose, although I don't think it was considered a success.
It had joint private funding and US army funding with the idea being that one version of the game could be used for SUT training by the army and another version would be rebalanced for fun and get a commercial release.
Plus "developed for the military" was a handy marketing gimmick.
Definitely true facts here. I remember my unit was tasked with training ANA soldiers in Afghanistan in 2009. It was quite the shitshow. One guy actually shot his own fingers off while leaning on his rifle like a cane.
One thing to remember though is it won't just be "us" vs "the migrants", a good percentage of the managerial elite (probably still a majority, despite DEI initiatives) are still reasonably intelligent hwites. One shitlib drone operator can do a lot of damage. Never underestimate the liberal impulse to destroy their own civilization.
I'd add cultural differences as well, referring to the famous article where the Arab company commander made sure to take the translated tank manuals away from the armour crews.
Too bad we can't have a discussion about IQ and what we need to do to ensure everyone can contribute, even if their IQs are suboptimal. However, one would immediately be accused of being a racist, so the solution is just to pay those types to sit at home and do nothing, sending them in a cycle of despair and poverty.
This is why every intelligent and aware individual should seriously consider including a small portion of their prepper library material on coaching, training, teaching, mentoring, management and leadership. If you have any idea of how to leverage those skills you will be greatly in demand for organizing and leading when the time comes.
Thank you Fabius. I appreciate your response and I agree that antifa has no honor nor do any of our enemies.
“all enemies, foreign and domestic” means just that; ALL of them.
The definition of honor is: (noun) 1. high respect; great esteem. 2. adherence to what is right or to a conventional standard of conduct. (verb) 1. regard with great respect. 2. fulfill (an obligation) or keep (an agreement).
Should we respect our enemies who want to rob, rape and kill as many of us as they can and enslave the rest? I would echo what our ancestors would say and give them the honor of our swords. The best they could hope for is a quick death.
A code of honor is a set of rules, ideals, or ways of behaving that are considered honorable within a given group, culture, or society. These codes are often based on ethical or moral considerations, or on cultural or individual values. Honor is for ourselves, each other and those who cannot fight but are in our camp; women, children, the old and infirm and our wounded and debilitated.
A Code of Honor in war is mainly about the conduct of troops in uniform. This conflict is something else entirely. If we don’t kill them all they will just keep attacking us. Total defeat of ALL our enemies is the ONLY option.
Don't ditch honor! Just don't expect it from the shrieking gurly mans. We have physical might and sanity on our side, so we can afford some honor. Just don't underestimate the enemy.
Honor is something deeply rooted, and extends into the higher animal kingdom. Males of many species engage in ritualized violence over territory and mating privileges.
When I said this stuff about IQ last week, I was told I was a ''eugenicist" for suggesting the low IQ of the invader savages makes them completely unfit for anything in our society. I was told I was 'part of the problem' and I was left to infer I was going to HELL for my moral inferiority. Yeah.
While all this is correct, we are not fighting these invader savages. That's the part I do not understand. WHY aren't we lining them up against the wall and slaughtering the lot?
McNamara's Morons were a correct solution to the problem: round up the idiots, let them stop bullets and find boobytraps.
That will save smart lives.
And Smart Lives Matter!!
More than others' lives, whether or not people want to admit that fact. They are the innovators, the ones who get there first, the ones who can do a better job of running The Big Machine.
Reminds me of General Buttnaked. When you have naked sub 70 IQ people on coke running around, they sure make easy targets. But that is Africa.
Re South American migrants - it would be interesting to analyze all the (civil war) conflicts in these countries, which have basically been going on non stop, militarily. How do they act, what are their tactics?
Arab migrant hordes are somewhat different, because they possess an aggressiveness that most other migrant groups lack. Remember, with all that IQ, Afghanistan was lost, and I am not sure that Lybia and Iraq can be declared victories. So I would consider these the most dangerous invaders.
Thank you for this article ; what you present is so obvious and important, yet so neglected. It was a few years ago when I realized the impact of IQ over ethnicities and I soon realized that the Bush wars in Africa is a fantastic example. The Rhodesian infantry noticed the guerrillas tended to shoot high and after examining captured rifles and captives they learned that the guerrilla soldiers set their AK-47's to 400m thinking that meant the rifle would hit further away.
In the Nordic countries all able bodied men were tested at age 17 and screened for roles based on their physical and mental abilities. I do not remember the screening criteria for e..g rifleman but the rooms in the kaserne where a signals platoon resided was very different from one where mortar men resided. (The mortar men in charge of calculations were bright).
IQ comes in different flavors though. Even if a person with an overall low IQ is unable to think deeply, they may still have kinesthetic abilities. Unfortunately, the average high IQ artist or creative tends to lack kinesthetic intelligence. They lean more towards linguistic intelligence or maybe logical (cerebral) intelligence. There are few true polymaths joining the military.
Being adept in multiple intelligences makes a difference. Spatial, kinesthetics, and mathematical abilities are probably the most important for a soldier. This is why revolutionaries and intellectuals stirred the hornet's nest from cafes and bars rather than actually enlisting. They have linguistic, musical, and philosophical logical skills that don't have much importance in war unless they're trying to be diplomats, create propaganda, or write some random intellectual manifesto.
Let's not get started on the amount of pseudo-intellectuals that exist in modern society.
Anyway, I actually scored a 92 on the ASVAB (back in the 2000s), but I personally know I'm incapable of tolerating warfare, directly or indirectly. I'm also a petite woman, so that doesn't help. I struggle with ethical dilemmas involving children and animals. Many people do.
The problem is that there are too many people out there that want to be the intellectual inspiring war from a cafe and nothing more. They don't want to get their hands dirty or feel guilty for indirectly killing anyone.
We're currently living in a "mouse utopia" of our own. You end up with more suicides, denial, and people running for the hills than warriors standing their ground. This is everywhere. You'll witness more "white flight" and social class segregation before you'll see any socially acceptable "white fight" in favor of racial or ethnic preference.
By the way, other immigrants (legal or illegal), non-whites, and "lesser whites" are noticing the influx of new immigrants. Some are not happy about it for different reasons.
Like someone else said, I expect more looting and rioting (a trend for a while now) driven by a lowered quality of life. Civil war? We're not there yet. The whole purpose of this civil unrest is manipulate people into wanting a one world order. Give the authoritarians a reason to step in, and expect that global nation without boundaries to manifest even faster. Civil war is exactly what the elitists want. It gives them a valid and socially acceptable excuse to take control and stabilize.
Cherry picking extreme cases does not a valid argument make. Polymaths would of course end up in something like cryptology where their unique abilities were most effectively used. There was also no argument made that the more intelligent a soldier was the better infantry he would make. The point was that effective modern infantry requires intelligence on the right side of the bell curve for White Europeans (but probably not third and fourth standard deviation), and for the invaders this represents the rare individuals three or even four standard deviations from their mean; such are likely to be officers, not sergeants. The man is the weapon, all of the accoutrements are just tools. Otherwise, there aren't "different types of intelligence" there are intelligent people with the mental fortitude to put their lives on the line for God and Country and there are those without. Same as it ever was.
Hear hear, I still think back to my time in infantry training and remember some of the truly impressive idiots we had (one guy literally did not know what the infantry did). They had some uses, but not many, and they weren't even terribly good as disposables. It's why most western militaries have moved away from conscripts to volunteers. It turns out war isn't just hard, it's complicated, and winning is difficult.
People are often surprised to find out that infantry has a much higher minimum ASVAB requirement than many Army jobs.
I always have to explain that low-IQ people can be trusted to do jobs that have a relatively low risk of collateral damage. Truck driver, cooks, laundry specialists, etc.
You can’t trust people with low processing capacity to make split second decisions with grenade launchers, machine guns, or even rifles. You can’t trust them to not get themselves killed quickly and easily by enemy forces.
Trouble is, these same western militaries did all they could to create a product no desirable volunteers want to buy. Yet the wizards of smart still think they can fight multiple wars against peer enemies with the current military. Draftee militaries provide a better cross section of the population, but good luck trying that nowadays.
EDIT - forgot to include perhaps the best example of why IQ matters in war. Operation Eland, in Rhodesia. 84 dudes in short shots wiped out 5000 communist trained and supplied guerrillas, without losing a single man. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Eland
How bad was his lack of knowledge about the infantry?
I would assume my idea of infantry ops is completely wrong since it's based on books and movies, was it that level of thing? Or not knowing they marched around with guns kind of thing?
A great article. The only 2 cents I can add is that as a former infantry and SF guy the range of things we had to know and be able to think through and act was damn near infinite. I always had contempt for the idiots who characterized us as cannon fodder. Those types wouldn't have lasted a day. And yeah, there were always dumb f...ks but that wasn't the norm. And that was before the "modern battlefield." Your comment about gamers is interesting. You do have to be able to do more than sit at a console for eight hours a day, like one young gamer told me he did. Of course, it's not as if I know anything about it because I don't.
Yes. The challenge would be whipping them into physical shape, but the nature of the problem solving (not the ranges or weapons details, vanishingly rarely are modern games accurate) but the mental exercise of visualizing space and tracking many different factors is very similar and appeals/selects for the same types of minds.
Which would seem obvious... the types of people attracted to simulations of conflict are the types of people who're mentally compatible with them.
I think athletes have the skills, situational and spatial awareness, ability to plan and adapt and communication.
The challenge is after having whipped them into (physical) shape turning them into a well oiled unit of one/ band of brothers.
that is the real challenge. I just question whether the raw material is there, even considering gamer interest and abilities. If someone wanted to play pretend military strategic or tactical conflict wouldn't they first want to get some real experience? But they don't, at least to my knowledge. Of course White boys aren't wanted and a D.I.E. CRT tranny and gay military aren't exactly incentives. I left in 2003 and some of that was creeping in which we ignored and laughed at. So I am obsolete.
and yes I was a USMC infantry officer (AKA: Leader of Grunts)
Good point.
I like the things you write.
There are about 250 million Americans who woke up today in a home with a gun, or several guns, in their place. The gooferment doesn't count people and things because when numbers get big they run out of fingers and toes. They also lie comprehensively. If they say it, it's a lie.
We outnumber them. We have other advantages. This is our territory. We know our ground.
It is not a matter of "if". The war is here.
The only remaining question is who is going to fight.
Excellent comment. I'll have to steal the word "gooferment", made me giggle.
The tip of the hat 🎩 goes to L. Neil Smith. Essay he wrote about AD 2010 had the word gooferment and I liked it.
The declaration of independence says that government necessarily involves consent. It also says that those in power "have abdicated government, placed us out of [their] protection and make war on us."
Food for thought.
100%.
It all "works" because of the consent of the governed.
It's quickly becoming evident to more people every day, that actions taken by government -- were never consented to. In fact, many were never even voted on by the people -- or even brought up as issues.
People have to keep their head on a swivel because events are happening rather quickly now. Stay frosty.
Thank you my friend. Yes, I withdrew my consent in 1993. I keep coming back to the declaration words: He has abdicated government, declared us out of his protection and makes war on us. These words fit our situation.
I think it’s time for a new “declaration”… maybe a “Declaration of Liberty”?
I think a lot is going to happen in the next two months, October and November. We are going to have to keep paying attention and making sure we have news sources that are legitimate unlike the television news
Stay frosty.
I know that's a "cheesy" term, but it's applicable.
Great comment Jim Isubscribed to you
Well written and thanks, I learned something here.
I caution you to be careful about distilling intelligence down to a simple one-dimensional scale. The Haitians may test poorly for IQ but they know that in a conflict they must be brutal and ruthless. American kids will be reluctant to act ruthlessly. I don’t believe a simple civil war is coming…it’s more likely to be looting on a biblical scale. The Americans will be defending their homes and their daughters from an unorganized rabble. They key will be in being smart enough to organize your friends, not raw individual intelligence
.... I have doubts that cannibals who live in shacks are doing well intellectually; if you want to argue theres some people who the iq test is off by 15 points, maybe. But 30 points, and every historical metric? No, don't humor it, its a shit hole even compared to other 3rd world countries.
having spent a fair amount of time in haiti and a fair amount of time in other third world countries (I was called to task once for calling them 4th world countries, it was unbearable to someone) I completely agree with you. Haitians are no threat to much of anything except unarmed people.
Haitians ain't shit in combat. And IQ is what it is; the science is solid. Somalis are damned near as stupid as Haitiains; neither group is a serious problem militarily.
Plus their skin color makes them stand out. When the Sh*t hits the fan, your skin color will determine your tribe. 😲😳😲
Andrew, I agree with you everything that you say here. My point is that Venezuelans and Haitians have a head start on the soft Americans, and we should not dismiss them as ‘stupid’
Haitians may be brutal and ruthless but 1) they can’t hide, and 2) they haven’t been up against the North American big game hunters and Veterans. They will only exist in history books afterwards.
Great article and a solid point. But the issue is that for this to work, these hypothetical Europeans would need to be organized into cohesive groups. The problem is, every institution has already been captured and weaponized against them, leaving them as disorganized individuals, no matter how clever, facing off against powerful, organized institutions.
I always push back on the organization angle... In major wars you've had entire regiments organized and kitted out and shipped to combat in a month.
A lot of people talk about organization as if it's this insurmountable problem when really the challenge of getting people together or FORMAL organizing is often best left to latest part of any action, since if you actually organize formally and have a name and are explicit about your thing you expose yourself to federal charges and being picked identified/picked off.
Its way better to just train with a few close friends and loosely network, and check up on each other and share knowledge, so that the actual formal organization can happen seamlessly and quickly at the moment of crisis... Should write a piece on it.
I’d definitely look forward to reading such an article. The other side of the coin, of course, is that a significant portion of the high-IQ but mercenary Europeans are currently alligned with the institutions—those just in it for the paycheck and pension. Still, I agree with your point about formal and informal organization. And Rhodesia was a perfect example of exactly what you’ve been talking about.
I believe you are correct. Via https://degraw.substack.com/p/heads-up-major-report-on-civilian Key takeaways:
48 million Americans are presently classified as “Combat Capable,”
Approximately 30 million Americans own semi-automatic rifles, such as AR-15s.
14 million Americans are presently classified as “Combat Ready,” which means they consistently take part in tactical training courses, or do similar training, and demonstrate physical fitness and proficiency in handling firearms.
That indicates to me that 14 million American men that know what they're about can immediately get a combat buddy with a rifle, who will quickly learn what he's about, with 48 million more that a good portion of will be highly incentivized to in short order, obtain a rifle and learn what they're about.
That's why they've been doing such dumb shit for the past 20-30 years. They're trying to degrade the population b/c they know their opportunity window is shrinking to do something, anything, to stave off what's coming.
Excellent
Absolutely correct. I would recommend checking out
PM 8-94 How to Start and Train a Militia Unit
https://archive.org/details/How_to_Start_Train_a_Militia_Unit_PM_8--94
It’s a good primer.
Another good one is
Total resistance by Maj. Dach, Hans von
https://archive.org/details/totalresistance0000dach
This takes it to the next level.
The allusion to gamers as being suited to the situational awareness and mental ability necessary to make effective soldiers is... interesting.
I remember when the original Halo came out it was very popular amongst many of my fellow brothers-in-arms. Halo tournaments were even somewhat officially supported and fire teams from various squads used to compete against one another at the recreation center for various prizes. They used the same small unit and MOUT tactics in the game that they used in real life, which was why it was so popular and somewhat officially sanctioned.
There is a demand begging to be filled for a hyper-realistic contemporary warfare simulator that would allow those who would be the patriots taking the fight to the Deep State in the coming civil war to meet together online in a virtual battlefield and practice various battle drills and small-unit tactics. Operations such as ambushes, using drones to provide surveillance and assist in attacks, guerilla tactics such as assassinations of local oppressors, or even targeting federal installations, etc.
The game could be based upon something similar to Google Maps or Street View, or some of the more advanced flight sims like the newest X Planes, and if it was networked it could allow hundreds or thousands of patriots to practice their actions against an AI controlled federal opponent. With the right software, treadmills could be integrated so that one could gear up and actually somewhat simulate the physical effort needed. Those laser training simulator cartridges people use to practice at home along with an appropriate screen could allow for more realistic marksmanship with the actual weapon owned by the patriot. This is something that could possibly be crowd funded, and would likely be immensely popular among the white male gamer demographic which would be the ideal raw material for actual soldiers.
From what I remember "full spectrum warrior" was developed for that purpose, although I don't think it was considered a success.
It had joint private funding and US army funding with the idea being that one version of the game could be used for SUT training by the army and another version would be rebalanced for fun and get a commercial release.
Plus "developed for the military" was a handy marketing gimmick.
Project 100,000 is one of the most disgraceful acts in American history.
Definitely true facts here. I remember my unit was tasked with training ANA soldiers in Afghanistan in 2009. It was quite the shitshow. One guy actually shot his own fingers off while leaning on his rifle like a cane.
One thing to remember though is it won't just be "us" vs "the migrants", a good percentage of the managerial elite (probably still a majority, despite DEI initiatives) are still reasonably intelligent hwites. One shitlib drone operator can do a lot of damage. Never underestimate the liberal impulse to destroy their own civilization.
To cripple the PMC complex, hit the lights.
If you’ve ever been through an extended power outage, you understand how unable they are to function when their laptop isn’t working.
Drone operators have to operate from somewhere...
Agreed but when the ball goes up I don’t think the shitlibs will last long. I expect they will get fragged PDQ.
I'd add cultural differences as well, referring to the famous article where the Arab company commander made sure to take the translated tank manuals away from the armour crews.
https://www.meforum.org/middle-east-quarterly/why-arabs-lose-wars
Too bad we can't have a discussion about IQ and what we need to do to ensure everyone can contribute, even if their IQs are suboptimal. However, one would immediately be accused of being a racist, so the solution is just to pay those types to sit at home and do nothing, sending them in a cycle of despair and poverty.
This is why every intelligent and aware individual should seriously consider including a small portion of their prepper library material on coaching, training, teaching, mentoring, management and leadership. If you have any idea of how to leverage those skills you will be greatly in demand for organizing and leading when the time comes.
Alas, most of the college educated woketards are of average and above IQ.
Wokeness is a luxury belief. It may be rather hard to maintain that luxury when hostile invaders are shooting at you & actively trying to kill you.
Undergrad IQ average has been the same as gen pop for a while.
Lots of undergrads not finishing. Ergo, not college educated.
And deformed and weak beyond belief.
But the gurlimanifation means they can fight without honor. Unexpected danger awaits.
Please define fighting WITH honor on the modern hyperkinetic battlefield.
For without honor, recall the Antifa goons cold cocking people and giving out surprise tear gassings -- not to mention hitting women.
No proper buildup to violence. Wider target selection.
Thank you Fabius. I appreciate your response and I agree that antifa has no honor nor do any of our enemies.
“all enemies, foreign and domestic” means just that; ALL of them.
The definition of honor is: (noun) 1. high respect; great esteem. 2. adherence to what is right or to a conventional standard of conduct. (verb) 1. regard with great respect. 2. fulfill (an obligation) or keep (an agreement).
Should we respect our enemies who want to rob, rape and kill as many of us as they can and enslave the rest? I would echo what our ancestors would say and give them the honor of our swords. The best they could hope for is a quick death.
A code of honor is a set of rules, ideals, or ways of behaving that are considered honorable within a given group, culture, or society. These codes are often based on ethical or moral considerations, or on cultural or individual values. Honor is for ourselves, each other and those who cannot fight but are in our camp; women, children, the old and infirm and our wounded and debilitated.
A Code of Honor in war is mainly about the conduct of troops in uniform. This conflict is something else entirely. If we don’t kill them all they will just keep attacking us. Total defeat of ALL our enemies is the ONLY option.
Don't ditch honor! Just don't expect it from the shrieking gurly mans. We have physical might and sanity on our side, so we can afford some honor. Just don't underestimate the enemy.
Honor is something deeply rooted, and extends into the higher animal kingdom. Males of many species engage in ritualized violence over territory and mating privileges.
When I said this stuff about IQ last week, I was told I was a ''eugenicist" for suggesting the low IQ of the invader savages makes them completely unfit for anything in our society. I was told I was 'part of the problem' and I was left to infer I was going to HELL for my moral inferiority. Yeah.
While all this is correct, we are not fighting these invader savages. That's the part I do not understand. WHY aren't we lining them up against the wall and slaughtering the lot?
McNamara's Morons were a correct solution to the problem: round up the idiots, let them stop bullets and find boobytraps.
That will save smart lives.
And Smart Lives Matter!!
More than others' lives, whether or not people want to admit that fact. They are the innovators, the ones who get there first, the ones who can do a better job of running The Big Machine.
#SmartLivesMatter
Reminds me of General Buttnaked. When you have naked sub 70 IQ people on coke running around, they sure make easy targets. But that is Africa.
Re South American migrants - it would be interesting to analyze all the (civil war) conflicts in these countries, which have basically been going on non stop, militarily. How do they act, what are their tactics?
Arab migrant hordes are somewhat different, because they possess an aggressiveness that most other migrant groups lack. Remember, with all that IQ, Afghanistan was lost, and I am not sure that Lybia and Iraq can be declared victories. So I would consider these the most dangerous invaders.
Afghanistan was lost because we refused to properly colonize it.
South American conflicts vary wildly since they can be anything from african drug gangs to pureblood Germans with a regular military.
Thank you for this article ; what you present is so obvious and important, yet so neglected. It was a few years ago when I realized the impact of IQ over ethnicities and I soon realized that the Bush wars in Africa is a fantastic example. The Rhodesian infantry noticed the guerrillas tended to shoot high and after examining captured rifles and captives they learned that the guerrilla soldiers set their AK-47's to 400m thinking that meant the rifle would hit further away.
In the Nordic countries all able bodied men were tested at age 17 and screened for roles based on their physical and mental abilities. I do not remember the screening criteria for e..g rifleman but the rooms in the kaserne where a signals platoon resided was very different from one where mortar men resided. (The mortar men in charge of calculations were bright).
I've heard that story about too many places and people to take it seriously. Although it is perfectly believable.
Armed gangs without intelligent processing are still a great danger if they run amok within general civilian population.
And there’s a higher level authority that will do their best to ruin your life if you fight back against the gangs in a proactive manner.
Yeah but that’s why there’s gonna be a pile of badges next to the pile of skulls and the pile of pale blue helmets.
For a day or so, probably.
IQ comes in different flavors though. Even if a person with an overall low IQ is unable to think deeply, they may still have kinesthetic abilities. Unfortunately, the average high IQ artist or creative tends to lack kinesthetic intelligence. They lean more towards linguistic intelligence or maybe logical (cerebral) intelligence. There are few true polymaths joining the military.
Being adept in multiple intelligences makes a difference. Spatial, kinesthetics, and mathematical abilities are probably the most important for a soldier. This is why revolutionaries and intellectuals stirred the hornet's nest from cafes and bars rather than actually enlisting. They have linguistic, musical, and philosophical logical skills that don't have much importance in war unless they're trying to be diplomats, create propaganda, or write some random intellectual manifesto.
Let's not get started on the amount of pseudo-intellectuals that exist in modern society.
Anyway, I actually scored a 92 on the ASVAB (back in the 2000s), but I personally know I'm incapable of tolerating warfare, directly or indirectly. I'm also a petite woman, so that doesn't help. I struggle with ethical dilemmas involving children and animals. Many people do.
The problem is that there are too many people out there that want to be the intellectual inspiring war from a cafe and nothing more. They don't want to get their hands dirty or feel guilty for indirectly killing anyone.
We're currently living in a "mouse utopia" of our own. You end up with more suicides, denial, and people running for the hills than warriors standing their ground. This is everywhere. You'll witness more "white flight" and social class segregation before you'll see any socially acceptable "white fight" in favor of racial or ethnic preference.
By the way, other immigrants (legal or illegal), non-whites, and "lesser whites" are noticing the influx of new immigrants. Some are not happy about it for different reasons.
Like someone else said, I expect more looting and rioting (a trend for a while now) driven by a lowered quality of life. Civil war? We're not there yet. The whole purpose of this civil unrest is manipulate people into wanting a one world order. Give the authoritarians a reason to step in, and expect that global nation without boundaries to manifest even faster. Civil war is exactly what the elitists want. It gives them a valid and socially acceptable excuse to take control and stabilize.
Cherry picking extreme cases does not a valid argument make. Polymaths would of course end up in something like cryptology where their unique abilities were most effectively used. There was also no argument made that the more intelligent a soldier was the better infantry he would make. The point was that effective modern infantry requires intelligence on the right side of the bell curve for White Europeans (but probably not third and fourth standard deviation), and for the invaders this represents the rare individuals three or even four standard deviations from their mean; such are likely to be officers, not sergeants. The man is the weapon, all of the accoutrements are just tools. Otherwise, there aren't "different types of intelligence" there are intelligent people with the mental fortitude to put their lives on the line for God and Country and there are those without. Same as it ever was.
IQ does NOT come in 'different flavors.' That's all nonsense.