Great article. Reminded me of an argument explaining the "he/I dindu nuffin" response. Basically, they can't even empathize with themselves except in the very moment. The "I" of 5 minutes ago that stabbed someone isn't the same "I" of right now, hence they actually believe "I dindu nuffin" even if covered in blood, because that nigger of 5 minutes did the stabbing. Not the nigger of right-now.
Kind of like if someone accused you of breaking something when you were 5 years old, you'd likely defend yourself by saying that was so long ago it was effectively a different person, and you shouldn't be held responsible for that other person that you were so many decades ago.
This lack of empathy for not-current self also helps to explain a high time preference. There are studies showing that low time preference is basically having empathy with your future self, but if you have no empathy and/or no sense of any self but that of the present self, then it never makes any sense to worry about the future. Because they have no sense of that future person and/or no empathy with that future person.
It's a christian doctrine period, and jewish before that.
If Warmek is a christian then he's caught in a contradiction. If blacks are subhuman then they do not have souls. If they have souls then they are not subhuman.
I'm not. "Christian", that is. I'm not anything really, on that axis.
I'm also not basing "human" or "subhuman" on skin color, and not actually declaring any members of H. sap to not be. "Subhuman" in this context is a shorthand for those who simply *act* that way.
I judge every member of my species as possessing at least the potential to behave well. Many of them do not meet the standard. Judge people by their actions, and act accordingly.
It's not the idea that "everyone has a soul" that's necessarily the problem. It's the idea that human souls are suddenly poofed into existence ex-nihilo at the moment of conception that's the issue; such a doctrine was the precursor to the shitlib tabula rasa superstition. Christian church fathers done goofed when they made reincarnation a forbidden doctrine.
Now add in the preexistence of souls and the doctrines of reincarnation and karma and you have some very reasonable explanations of why some people are born evil or stupid right out of the womb. Immature, animalistic, and morally-afflicted souls are likely to incarnate into communities where similar souls are common. Like finds like.
The other main two competing explanations are genetics (HBD) and environment (social "injustices" blamed on more successful demographics).
Oh, turns out I'm kind of wrong. It was Justinian at the second council of constantinople, but he did so on the advice of the bishops there after they debated the matter. Specifically they banned Origenism.
Incidentally Justinian was a seriously twisted person, and his wife was one of the most evil women ever to have lived.
Sure, but this guy doesn't even get that far. It's not that he's capable of moral decisionmarking but chose to be evil instead, he's simply not intelligent enough to do so.
“For basically NO whites or Asians does any such insult exist.” I should like to clarify this.
American blacks live in an honor culture. We know this is not an anthropomorphization because there are whites (the backwoods culture) which had this same honor culture in the south two hundred years ago, and still do in isolated pockets in out of the way places (hence backwoods). If you were to meet methed-up, cousin-marrying moonshiners in BFE Alabama and insulted them randomly out of nowhere, they absolutely would haul off and stab you—indeed they would not need even so small a provocation; “he looked at me funny” is more than sufficient to trigger this particular group of white people’s stabby-stab stimulus response.
Majority white culture lives under a dignity culture instead—personal guilt keeps people in line. Not only is it beneath my dignity to stab annoying strangers on the bus, but Jesus wouldn’t like it.
Asians of course live in a shame-based culture—they wouldn’t stab you for a personal insult because it would bring shame upon their family—but if you offered them sufficient insult against their family or tribal group, it would bring shame on them for _not_ stabbing you. That’s not to say such calumnies don’t exist, but they would have to be egregious.
In short, “basically NO such insult exists” is less about brain architecture and far more about upbringing and societal norms
In the most violent white county of the US the homocide rate is still lower than the most peaceful black county. Likewise the wealthiest upper quintile of the black population is more violent than the bottom poorest quintile of the white population.
This fairy tale of Scots-Irish borderers and honor culture does not hold up to statistical analysis. And NOWHERE would this be a normal behaviour towards an attractive woman you didn’t know
It also ignores that white honor cultures (there have been many) had elaborate public rituals for setting disputes. The duel is the most famous where in the aggrieved challenges (slap of the glove) the sponsors arrange the duel and set rules. The men meet and are given opportunity to make amends peacefully. And then an only then does the fight begin. This was common in the southern culture except they tended to fight bare fisted. The most primitive white settlement is probably the blood feud which required a public statement of feuding before everyone could start butchering each other. Never in white culture has it been anything but bloody murder to instantly kill over an insult. Challenge in some form must be given and the insulter given a chance to recant. This even occurs in bar fights today with the usual exchange of insults before fists fly.
I think you mean methed-out moonshine Appalachia. The Deep South birthed the Southern aristocracy, and that culture has sustained, if waned a bit due to their children moving out to the coasts.
The second is that in the Middle Ages, Europeans evidently executed about 1% of the male population every year, removing the violent and chlorinating the gene pool.
The third is that the empathy you note - empathy without care to consequences - is directly downstream from women’s suffrage. Eve, Pandora, Brunhilde - mythology used to teach pre-literate peoples - all were female for a reason. Civilization - OR - suffrage; it’s a binary choice.
Hardly anyone knows anything about Christian metaphysics or anthropology. The people blithely saying, "We're all God's children," are completely ignorant of Christian doctrine. We are ONLY children of God by adoption AFTER baptism. We become "sons of God" when we are in Christ. We are given (per the Prologue of the Gospel of John) the "power to become sons of God" only by being baptised into the divine life. And this divine life doesn't reduce culpability for evil actions; quite the opposite.
Baptism rates are very high among africans, they love their little magic rituals, but all of that magic water doesn't seem to do anything to reduce their crime rate.
I wasn't commenting on that. Only that the general knowledge of what Christian doctrine actually is among people claiming the title is pretty dismal. There's a lot of lazy nonsense of the "We're all God's children" and "judge not" variety, gets spewed around the internet from people who wouldn't know what Christian anthropology or metaphysics actually is if it jumped up and bit them on the nose.
I watched a youtube video a while back wondering how we ended up being the only species of homo sapiens left and theorycrafting about how there might be another species out there hiding in the woods somewhere.
Of course, the real reason we're the only ones left is because we're ideologically fixated on the idea of adopting every other species as our own and ignoring the differences. Even if we miraculously discovered an isolated holdout population of homo flores they'd immediately declare them human, and possibly cancel the archeologist who first identified them as a separate species for being racist.
Barely sentient talking monkey purposely destroys something beautiful & pure due to an unconscious, inherent, animalistic jealous rage at what he is not and what he can never have. An inability for deeper level thoughts and a lack of capacity to analyze his emotions to control his impulses causes him to act with no regard to societies expectations.
We are allowing animals roam around white western civilization hurting humans & degrading living conditions due to civil rights laws, suicidal empathy, and nihilistic apathy. It’s insanity
> The Christian Theodicy is that Brown’s free will and poor choices and temptation to evil are the cause of his horrendous crime. That he was a human moral agent and his individual choices caused this horrible crime. That all people, Brown included, are ensouled beings made in God’s image, vested with a godlike reason and free will which may choose good or evil.
I'm not even Christian, and I don't actually disagree with this.
They all had the same opportunity to behave within these bounds.
They failed.
Death (or godhood) awaits those who cannot control themselves. Though the second is... rather less likely.
No, Brown didn't have the same opportunity to behave within those bounds, any more than the python had the opportunity not to try to eat the little girl. This is not to excuse or absolve him. It is to say he is not a person and should not be treated like one.
> It is in fact very likely that Welfare, SNAP, Catch and Release law enforcement, and the decay of ghetto culture is UNDOING the eugenic effects of slavery and Jim Crow, and the average African American is getting DUMBER each generation as we encourage men like Brown and Floyd to act out, get attention, commit sexual assaults, and breed.
Ah, yes! This is a thesis I had recently come to, that we had so warped the environment that following the handouts actually *was* survival of the fittest.
Good article. We need to be much harsher not only with these piles of murdering garbage but with 'christians' in general. I don't know if you know but Vox Day and co have a good term to differentiate real christians (faithful, strong willed, discipline, willing to enforce tough law ie death penalty) and churchians (post liberal christians who apply a faux universalism to everything)
I’m not worried. The micro nova is due in 2046 and I’ll be on mars by then. Strict IQ and time preference requirements for immigration. After things calm down we’ll rebuild earth and deal with different hominid groups differently
2046 is over two decades from now. Unless you're a young teenager then by the time that comes around you'll be well outside of the selection criteria for such a mission.
Not to mention that unless earth has already calmed down then the people running and funding such a project will still have a strong preference for diversity and will turn mars into just as much of a clownworld as this one.
Also by “things calming down” I meant “after the firestorms, tsunamis a thousand miles wide moving at a thousand miles per hour, and the continent-wide earthquakes that go on for weeks at a time have wiped out 99% of the human race, been replaced with glaciers two miles thick, and eventually stopped rumbling,” not “after the Aryan Scythian Hyperboreans rose in righteous anger to take their country back.”
I’m looking at 200-900 years for things to “calm down.” In other words, after the glaciers start to recede from North America and northern Eurasia, we can bring Martian colonizers to Earth and rebuild the West sans Enlightenment tomfoolery.
I’m 48 now and will be organizing the colony. Any diverse colonies that get founded will have to struggle along dragging the weight of the Erecti behind them, while my Cro-Magnon lightly spiced with Denisovan population will be crime-free and acing the math quizzes
A lot of Whites are so used to reading their ideals, thoughts, and emotions onto others, homo and beasts alike, that they’re not even aware of what they’re doing. It takes an intense self-awareness, which most Whites aren’t trained to master. Nor are they conditioned to debating religion and politics around the dinner table. This is why they are often wrong-footed in real life.
BTW I'm Losing subscribers over this post.
If you're not subscribed or agree with me enough to become a paid subscriber... You'd help stop the bleeding
Great article. Reminded me of an argument explaining the "he/I dindu nuffin" response. Basically, they can't even empathize with themselves except in the very moment. The "I" of 5 minutes ago that stabbed someone isn't the same "I" of right now, hence they actually believe "I dindu nuffin" even if covered in blood, because that nigger of 5 minutes did the stabbing. Not the nigger of right-now.
Kind of like if someone accused you of breaking something when you were 5 years old, you'd likely defend yourself by saying that was so long ago it was effectively a different person, and you shouldn't be held responsible for that other person that you were so many decades ago.
This lack of empathy for not-current self also helps to explain a high time preference. There are studies showing that low time preference is basically having empathy with your future self, but if you have no empathy and/or no sense of any self but that of the present self, then it never makes any sense to worry about the future. Because they have no sense of that future person and/or no empathy with that future person.
The 15 second negroid copy pasta. A prophetic and mostly accurate description of at least 30 million “scholars” in the USA.
Jefferson wrote about this btw. He said we need to free them and return them to Africa or eventually one race will destroy the other.
The Christian idea that everyone has a soul has to be defeated before any of this changes.
Everyone has a soul. Everyone should be judged as one would judge themselves.
This principle doesn't bode well for the subhuman.
Act accordingly.
Do they? Christian doctrine posits that only humans have souls, animals and plants are just automata placed there for our use and enjoyment.
If, as a christian, you identify some hominids as subhuman then you acknowledge that they lack souls.
Nicene Christianity is most certainly not the only game in town when it comes to the concept of souls.
It's a christian doctrine period, and jewish before that.
If Warmek is a christian then he's caught in a contradiction. If blacks are subhuman then they do not have souls. If they have souls then they are not subhuman.
I'm not. "Christian", that is. I'm not anything really, on that axis.
I'm also not basing "human" or "subhuman" on skin color, and not actually declaring any members of H. sap to not be. "Subhuman" in this context is a shorthand for those who simply *act* that way.
I judge every member of my species as possessing at least the potential to behave well. Many of them do not meet the standard. Judge people by their actions, and act accordingly.
I'm talking about the existence of souls in general, not the specific doctrinal claim that only humans have souls.
I'm replying to Warmek's claim that everyone has a soul.
Incidentally I'm an animist, I do believe everything has a soul in some way, but the capacity for moral decisionmaking varies between physical shells.
It's not the idea that "everyone has a soul" that's necessarily the problem. It's the idea that human souls are suddenly poofed into existence ex-nihilo at the moment of conception that's the issue; such a doctrine was the precursor to the shitlib tabula rasa superstition. Christian church fathers done goofed when they made reincarnation a forbidden doctrine.
Now add in the preexistence of souls and the doctrines of reincarnation and karma and you have some very reasonable explanations of why some people are born evil or stupid right out of the womb. Immature, animalistic, and morally-afflicted souls are likely to incarnate into communities where similar souls are common. Like finds like.
The other main two competing explanations are genetics (HBD) and environment (social "injustices" blamed on more successful demographics).
It was an emperor who forbade preaching reincarnation, not a convocation of bishops.
I've never heard this. Which one?
Oh, turns out I'm kind of wrong. It was Justinian at the second council of constantinople, but he did so on the advice of the bishops there after they debated the matter. Specifically they banned Origenism.
Incidentally Justinian was a seriously twisted person, and his wife was one of the most evil women ever to have lived.
Yeah, that makes sense. Justinian was awful in many ways.
The idea that everyone has a soul is compatible with the idea that many ensouled people are a danger to themselves rest of humanity.
Sure, but this guy doesn't even get that far. It's not that he's capable of moral decisionmarking but chose to be evil instead, he's simply not intelligent enough to do so.
“For basically NO whites or Asians does any such insult exist.” I should like to clarify this.
American blacks live in an honor culture. We know this is not an anthropomorphization because there are whites (the backwoods culture) which had this same honor culture in the south two hundred years ago, and still do in isolated pockets in out of the way places (hence backwoods). If you were to meet methed-up, cousin-marrying moonshiners in BFE Alabama and insulted them randomly out of nowhere, they absolutely would haul off and stab you—indeed they would not need even so small a provocation; “he looked at me funny” is more than sufficient to trigger this particular group of white people’s stabby-stab stimulus response.
Majority white culture lives under a dignity culture instead—personal guilt keeps people in line. Not only is it beneath my dignity to stab annoying strangers on the bus, but Jesus wouldn’t like it.
Asians of course live in a shame-based culture—they wouldn’t stab you for a personal insult because it would bring shame upon their family—but if you offered them sufficient insult against their family or tribal group, it would bring shame on them for _not_ stabbing you. That’s not to say such calumnies don’t exist, but they would have to be egregious.
In short, “basically NO such insult exists” is less about brain architecture and far more about upbringing and societal norms
In the most violent white county of the US the homocide rate is still lower than the most peaceful black county. Likewise the wealthiest upper quintile of the black population is more violent than the bottom poorest quintile of the white population.
This fairy tale of Scots-Irish borderers and honor culture does not hold up to statistical analysis. And NOWHERE would this be a normal behaviour towards an attractive woman you didn’t know
It also ignores that white honor cultures (there have been many) had elaborate public rituals for setting disputes. The duel is the most famous where in the aggrieved challenges (slap of the glove) the sponsors arrange the duel and set rules. The men meet and are given opportunity to make amends peacefully. And then an only then does the fight begin. This was common in the southern culture except they tended to fight bare fisted. The most primitive white settlement is probably the blood feud which required a public statement of feuding before everyone could start butchering each other. Never in white culture has it been anything but bloody murder to instantly kill over an insult. Challenge in some form must be given and the insulter given a chance to recant. This even occurs in bar fights today with the usual exchange of insults before fists fly.
I most heartily agree. I’m beginning to wonder whether maybe the slave holders got their violent honor culture from the Africans?🤔🤨🧐
*we used to live in an honour culture
We've been domesticated beyond the point of retaining our survival instincts. We urgently need to get our honour culture back.
Pretty much what Sowell describes in his book “ Black Rednecks, White Liberals”.
It’s more about impulse control and prefrontal cortex discrepancies.
I think you mean methed-out moonshine Appalachia. The Deep South birthed the Southern aristocracy, and that culture has sustained, if waned a bit due to their children moving out to the coasts.
Let’s cut out the bullshit, stay away from them if at all possible.
Staying away from them implies that there's a "them" with meaningful differences to begin with. Most whites aren't ready to make that leap yet.
Excellent piece. I was intrigued, also, by Reich’s recent book on ancient DNA, and what scientists are NOT allowed to study and write about.
Three comments, the first of which is my recent “What if they can’t?” and the comments, particularly by Ziffer.
https://open.substack.com/pub/alexanderscipio/p/cincinnati-thuggery-dei-and-reality?r=ownpk&utm_medium=ios
The second is that in the Middle Ages, Europeans evidently executed about 1% of the male population every year, removing the violent and chlorinating the gene pool.
The third is that the empathy you note - empathy without care to consequences - is directly downstream from women’s suffrage. Eve, Pandora, Brunhilde - mythology used to teach pre-literate peoples - all were female for a reason. Civilization - OR - suffrage; it’s a binary choice.
Hardly anyone knows anything about Christian metaphysics or anthropology. The people blithely saying, "We're all God's children," are completely ignorant of Christian doctrine. We are ONLY children of God by adoption AFTER baptism. We become "sons of God" when we are in Christ. We are given (per the Prologue of the Gospel of John) the "power to become sons of God" only by being baptised into the divine life. And this divine life doesn't reduce culpability for evil actions; quite the opposite.
Baptism rates are very high among africans, they love their little magic rituals, but all of that magic water doesn't seem to do anything to reduce their crime rate.
I wasn't commenting on that. Only that the general knowledge of what Christian doctrine actually is among people claiming the title is pretty dismal. There's a lot of lazy nonsense of the "We're all God's children" and "judge not" variety, gets spewed around the internet from people who wouldn't know what Christian anthropology or metaphysics actually is if it jumped up and bit them on the nose.
Unfortunately I think you're correct.
I watched a youtube video a while back wondering how we ended up being the only species of homo sapiens left and theorycrafting about how there might be another species out there hiding in the woods somewhere.
Of course, the real reason we're the only ones left is because we're ideologically fixated on the idea of adopting every other species as our own and ignoring the differences. Even if we miraculously discovered an isolated holdout population of homo flores they'd immediately declare them human, and possibly cancel the archeologist who first identified them as a separate species for being racist.
Barely sentient talking monkey purposely destroys something beautiful & pure due to an unconscious, inherent, animalistic jealous rage at what he is not and what he can never have. An inability for deeper level thoughts and a lack of capacity to analyze his emotions to control his impulses causes him to act with no regard to societies expectations.
We are allowing animals roam around white western civilization hurting humans & degrading living conditions due to civil rights laws, suicidal empathy, and nihilistic apathy. It’s insanity
> The Christian Theodicy is that Brown’s free will and poor choices and temptation to evil are the cause of his horrendous crime. That he was a human moral agent and his individual choices caused this horrible crime. That all people, Brown included, are ensouled beings made in God’s image, vested with a godlike reason and free will which may choose good or evil.
I'm not even Christian, and I don't actually disagree with this.
They all had the same opportunity to behave within these bounds.
They failed.
Death (or godhood) awaits those who cannot control themselves. Though the second is... rather less likely.
"So you want to be Loki..."
No, Brown didn't have the same opportunity to behave within those bounds, any more than the python had the opportunity not to try to eat the little girl. This is not to excuse or absolve him. It is to say he is not a person and should not be treated like one.
> It is in fact very likely that Welfare, SNAP, Catch and Release law enforcement, and the decay of ghetto culture is UNDOING the eugenic effects of slavery and Jim Crow, and the average African American is getting DUMBER each generation as we encourage men like Brown and Floyd to act out, get attention, commit sexual assaults, and breed.
Ah, yes! This is a thesis I had recently come to, that we had so warped the environment that following the handouts actually *was* survival of the fittest.
Good article. We need to be much harsher not only with these piles of murdering garbage but with 'christians' in general. I don't know if you know but Vox Day and co have a good term to differentiate real christians (faithful, strong willed, discipline, willing to enforce tough law ie death penalty) and churchians (post liberal christians who apply a faux universalism to everything)
The nigger animal does not have reasons it has urges.
I’m not worried. The micro nova is due in 2046 and I’ll be on mars by then. Strict IQ and time preference requirements for immigration. After things calm down we’ll rebuild earth and deal with different hominid groups differently
2046 is over two decades from now. Unless you're a young teenager then by the time that comes around you'll be well outside of the selection criteria for such a mission.
Not to mention that unless earth has already calmed down then the people running and funding such a project will still have a strong preference for diversity and will turn mars into just as much of a clownworld as this one.
Also by “things calming down” I meant “after the firestorms, tsunamis a thousand miles wide moving at a thousand miles per hour, and the continent-wide earthquakes that go on for weeks at a time have wiped out 99% of the human race, been replaced with glaciers two miles thick, and eventually stopped rumbling,” not “after the Aryan Scythian Hyperboreans rose in righteous anger to take their country back.”
I’m looking at 200-900 years for things to “calm down.” In other words, after the glaciers start to recede from North America and northern Eurasia, we can bring Martian colonizers to Earth and rebuild the West sans Enlightenment tomfoolery.
What on earth makes you think any of that is going to happen?
I’m 48 now and will be organizing the colony. Any diverse colonies that get founded will have to struggle along dragging the weight of the Erecti behind them, while my Cro-Magnon lightly spiced with Denisovan population will be crime-free and acing the math quizzes
Why would they send a guy beyond retirement age to mars? There are 20 year olds with organisation skills.
If people are still cucked enough to make diverse colonies at all they won't tolerate any aryan ones to compete with them.
You misunderstand. “They” won’t send “me.” _I_ am going. _I_ will bring some of “them” with me.
I wish I had your kind of money.
Lol he doesn't and he's full of crap. He watches some guy channel a demon and believes it
Your poverty
Watch Bashar
Possibly the most important post of the last decade.
india has more vegetarians than anywhere though (regarding the point about it partaking in animal cruelty)
A lot of Whites are so used to reading their ideals, thoughts, and emotions onto others, homo and beasts alike, that they’re not even aware of what they’re doing. It takes an intense self-awareness, which most Whites aren’t trained to master. Nor are they conditioned to debating religion and politics around the dinner table. This is why they are often wrong-footed in real life.