But seriously though, suppose an 60 year old man who regularly exercises and is in decent shape. Is a rifle in that man's hand less effective than in an 18 year old's hands?
People will be aghast at such a proposal while still insisting we need to squeeze 18-40 year olds to fund "entitlements" for another few years, knowing full well the next generations will never see a dime.
A very Canadian solution. I'm not a libertarian but personally, I would just axe entitlements and let the chips fall where they may. Didn't prepare for the future by saving money or goodwill with your kin? Figure it out. It's not like Social Security will be around when I'm old. Nor frankly should it be.
It's the same difference. People get dead one way or another and they want us to believe it's for the greater good. There is no such animal as the greater good. Especially as defined by these murdering clowns.
Magic! Happy to report England is way ahead of you. Euthanized thousands during coof, in preparation for the war that put an end to it. Maybe, just Maybe the "coalition of the willing" will actually be able to defeat Putler.
How about fuck the mass conscription as well, since there's not a war worth fighting in the offing, unless you're a Big Fan of Clown World horseshit?
Euthanizing the elderly in Congress and the judiciary and most of the bureaucracy would be fine, though. That sort of "institutional memory" we could do without, thank you.
Most soldiers don't serve in combat zones save in all out wars such as WWII.
Simple solution:
!. Make it possible to volunteer to serve in the defensive forces only without being committed to foreign adventures.
2. Pay those who do go on the foreign adventures WAY more than what the defensive soldiers make. (Also, more opportunities for promotions.)
Thus it takes two acts of volunteering to end up on a foreign adventure.
(OK, for certain special forces, or really high dollar training such as fighter jet pilot, you have to make yourself available for adventures before taking the advanced training.)
🤩 I've been promoting that solution for years. I've flat out told sick, pathetic boomers to their face that they should 🪢 themselves for the good of the country.
The young are more important than the old. Boomers should have adequately funded Social Security, but they chose not to. Not it's time for that selfish generation to reap the consequences
Didn't we already have that? What was the COVID treatment protocol of Remdesivir and pressure on the lungs via respirators but an extermination play?
Exactly
I propose a compromise: conscript the elderly.
But seriously though, suppose an 60 year old man who regularly exercises and is in decent shape. Is a rifle in that man's hand less effective than in an 18 year old's hands?
Armed and armored mobility scooters! Edith's has a grenade launcher. Agnes prefers hers with a .50 cal.
I suspect that 60 year old is more likely to point that rifle at his own government rather than propagandised enemy.
I LOL’ed 😂🫡
I'm 76 and I did too.
How about white men don't go and die for ZOG, no matter what the rewards?
How about forcing Jews to go fight?
Here's a thought- raid synagogues and drag those curly-haired yids off to the frontlines
Canada is already way ahead
People will be aghast at such a proposal while still insisting we need to squeeze 18-40 year olds to fund "entitlements" for another few years, knowing full well the next generations will never see a dime.
Did anybody notice that when the Russians invaded, most Ukrainians just left? They’re running the entire garbage business in Chicago now.
What a modest proposal!
A modern day Jonathan Swift!
That was 100% different. Swift's satire was about killing the young
A very Canadian solution. I'm not a libertarian but personally, I would just axe entitlements and let the chips fall where they may. Didn't prepare for the future by saving money or goodwill with your kin? Figure it out. It's not like Social Security will be around when I'm old. Nor frankly should it be.
Turn off the TV and it all ends. Conscript the news anchors.
It's the same difference. People get dead one way or another and they want us to believe it's for the greater good. There is no such animal as the greater good. Especially as defined by these murdering clowns.
Magic! Happy to report England is way ahead of you. Euthanized thousands during coof, in preparation for the war that put an end to it. Maybe, just Maybe the "coalition of the willing" will actually be able to defeat Putler.
Fuck you
Where's the "fuck you" during the forced inoculation of dubious liquid into everyone's body?
It was there, then, too, sir…..
How about fuck the mass conscription as well, since there's not a war worth fighting in the offing, unless you're a Big Fan of Clown World horseshit?
Euthanizing the elderly in Congress and the judiciary and most of the bureaucracy would be fine, though. That sort of "institutional memory" we could do without, thank you.
Most soldiers don't serve in combat zones save in all out wars such as WWII.
Simple solution:
!. Make it possible to volunteer to serve in the defensive forces only without being committed to foreign adventures.
2. Pay those who do go on the foreign adventures WAY more than what the defensive soldiers make. (Also, more opportunities for promotions.)
Thus it takes two acts of volunteering to end up on a foreign adventure.
(OK, for certain special forces, or really high dollar training such as fighter jet pilot, you have to make yourself available for adventures before taking the advanced training.)
🤩 I've been promoting that solution for years. I've flat out told sick, pathetic boomers to their face that they should 🪢 themselves for the good of the country.
The young are more important than the old. Boomers should have adequately funded Social Security, but they chose not to. Not it's time for that selfish generation to reap the consequences
Spicy.