Deep down, leftists know what they are, and what they deserve. It's easier to cope by running away or burying it with lies. All there is for them is an endless rebellion against the cruelty of the natural order. They hate truth and beauty because they can only see themselves as wretched or monstrous.
It is amazing the swiftness with which they whip out the lies. Less than one second after a news story emerges about one of their own, they have locked n loaded automated retorts ready to go.
Hilarious. As far as leftist always being wrong, having a contraindicator that is reliable is just as useful as having a genius who is always correct, and a hell of a lot more common. Don't look a gift horse in the mouth, and whatever you do don't tell them you're using them this way...it can throw off the readings.
Well, there may be a bit more going on behind the curtain than you realize, or imagine!
The Politically-Correct Progressive belief system was clearly and succinctly spelled out by Willi Muenzenberg, in the early 1920s. He then promulgated those beliefs with a brilliant covert influence operation, targeted against the Normal American culture, using Willing Accomplices in Hollywood, education/academia, and the media.
The beliefs were pounded into Americans for decades, and gradually consumed our culture.
"They can do it EVEN WHEN ENCOUNTERING IT FOR THE FIRST TIME AND WITHOUT SOCIAL PRIMING BY THE MORE KNOWLEDGEABLE such as Margaret Mead and the pacific Islanders.
How did she know to lie and make up fruity sexual perversions no pacific Island community has ever practiced!? How did she know that was the right thing to do for leftism?"
Great choice of Margaret Meade as a case study. But your assertion, that she was just intuitively creating her scam, is just, respectfully, wrong.
Mead was a protege/lover of the early adopter of the PC-Prog mission to destroy Normal American culture, Franz Boas. A German Jew, ensconced at that center of PC-Progism, Columbia U., he pushed the Muenzenberg operation in academia/education, and used the media to push it, too. The Muenzenberg goal was to make everything good about America appear bad. The ultimate bad was white, heterosexual, men who built things, made things, and ran businesses for a profit.
Boas created a new approach to Anthropology, cultural relativism. He primed his graduate students, among them, the omni-sexual Margaret Mead, to "discover" that primitive cultures were superior to American culture.
So, no, Mead, nor any PC-Prog is NOT "intuitively" finding that Normal American culture sucks. They are simply regurgitating the piss that they've been drinking their entire lives.
More details:
Margaret Mead: Hoaxter or Fool?
Case Study--Failure created by Cultural Incompetence
That is Melissa Click, at the time at Mizzou (of course). Video still from a video by Kayla Schierbecker. If you haven’t seen it, it’s pretty funny. „Can I get some muscle over here?“
They aren't a stopped clock. The "trust the science" liberal orthodoxy used to be that IQ was not malleable but gender expression was the result of upbringing.
I'm assuming that Kulak's post is satire -- aimed somewhat inward. Contemplate the phrase "liberal hypocrisy."
"How did she know to lie and make up fruity sexual perversions no pacific Island community has ever practiced!? How did she know that was the right thing to do for leftism?"
Deep down, leftists know what they are, and what they deserve. It's easier to cope by running away or burying it with lies. All there is for them is an endless rebellion against the cruelty of the natural order. They hate truth and beauty because they can only see themselves as wretched or monstrous.
it really is that simple most the time. a pseudointellectual philosophy for the losers.
It is amazing the swiftness with which they whip out the lies. Less than one second after a news story emerges about one of their own, they have locked n loaded automated retorts ready to go.
Hilarious. As far as leftist always being wrong, having a contraindicator that is reliable is just as useful as having a genius who is always correct, and a hell of a lot more common. Don't look a gift horse in the mouth, and whatever you do don't tell them you're using them this way...it can throw off the readings.
Well, there may be a bit more going on behind the curtain than you realize, or imagine!
The Politically-Correct Progressive belief system was clearly and succinctly spelled out by Willi Muenzenberg, in the early 1920s. He then promulgated those beliefs with a brilliant covert influence operation, targeted against the Normal American culture, using Willing Accomplices in Hollywood, education/academia, and the media.
The beliefs were pounded into Americans for decades, and gradually consumed our culture.
"They can do it EVEN WHEN ENCOUNTERING IT FOR THE FIRST TIME AND WITHOUT SOCIAL PRIMING BY THE MORE KNOWLEDGEABLE such as Margaret Mead and the pacific Islanders.
How did she know to lie and make up fruity sexual perversions no pacific Island community has ever practiced!? How did she know that was the right thing to do for leftism?"
Great choice of Margaret Meade as a case study. But your assertion, that she was just intuitively creating her scam, is just, respectfully, wrong.
Mead was a protege/lover of the early adopter of the PC-Prog mission to destroy Normal American culture, Franz Boas. A German Jew, ensconced at that center of PC-Progism, Columbia U., he pushed the Muenzenberg operation in academia/education, and used the media to push it, too. The Muenzenberg goal was to make everything good about America appear bad. The ultimate bad was white, heterosexual, men who built things, made things, and ran businesses for a profit.
Boas created a new approach to Anthropology, cultural relativism. He primed his graduate students, among them, the omni-sexual Margaret Mead, to "discover" that primitive cultures were superior to American culture.
So, no, Mead, nor any PC-Prog is NOT "intuitively" finding that Normal American culture sucks. They are simply regurgitating the piss that they've been drinking their entire lives.
More details:
Margaret Mead: Hoaxter or Fool?
Case Study--Failure created by Cultural Incompetence
https://kentclizbe.substack.com/p/margaret-mead-hoaxter-or-fool?utm_source=publication-search
That is Melissa Click, at the time at Mizzou (of course). Video still from a video by Kayla Schierbecker. If you haven’t seen it, it’s pretty funny. „Can I get some muscle over here?“
Specifically *"can I get some black muscle over here."
That's what got her in trouble.
Reminds me of the Bret Deveriox Controversy a couple of years back.
Does anyone have any recommending reading of Psychometrics or psychology more broadly. I cant find anything that isn't gay
"Intelligence: All that Matters"
Is a good start.
The Read "The Bell Curve"
Then move on to "Race Differences in Intelligence" by Richard Lynn
It never ceases to amaze me how they always get it wrong. Even a stopped clock is right twice a day.
They aren't a stopped clock. The "trust the science" liberal orthodoxy used to be that IQ was not malleable but gender expression was the result of upbringing.
I'm assuming that Kulak's post is satire -- aimed somewhat inward. Contemplate the phrase "liberal hypocrisy."
"How did she know to lie and make up fruity sexual perversions no pacific Island community has ever practiced!? How did she know that was the right thing to do for leftism?"
She studied under Franz Boas. That's how.
I'm not gay. You're gay!
And this is why it's critical to find these people, execute them, and use them as fertilizer.