bin Laden was(is?) a CIA creation. Any writings attributed to him passed through a CIA narrative control process. And a great many of his CIA handlers subscribe to ShitLib beliefs and values.
The Bush crime family dynasty is the most treasonist in US history, far surpassing Benedict Arnold. From patriarch Prescott Bush actions as "Hitler's Banker" until his bank was seized by feds in 1943 for trading with the enemy, to Prescott Bush's association with Dulles to recover his German war partner's blood-stained loot after the war as he established the CIA. Who brought son George HW Bush on as a young operative being groomed, who was Ft Worth CIA station asset on scene when JFK's head was blown away, who worked for Kissinger to ditch Taiwan in favor of the CCP as UN Ambassador. Who became the first US Ambassador in Beijing at the same time Kissinger helped Klaus Schwab establish the WEF, establishing a pact between the Fascists and Marxists (as Hitler and Stalin tried) to gradually eliminate selfish and dangerous western liberal capitalist freedom from the world. Who declared a New World Order was needed to save all humanity aligning Fascist and Marxist powers as he watched the CCP brutally crush the Tiananmen Square freedom movement, rewarding the CCP with MFN trade partner status, and accelerated the deindustrialization of the US to industrialize China. Who destabilized the Middle East, groomed bogey men like bin Laden. Who set a stable of ambitious sons into politics groomed to ascend as a permanent ruling dynasty. George W Bush selected to continue the destruction of the US, who used the CIA's groomed asset bin Laden as a scapegoat to attack the US and usher in the surveillance security police state targeting domestic political opposition, consolidated religious institutions under government surveillance and control, establishing a biosecurity state that were all necessary to produce the medical tyranny system we've experienced since 2020 that's easily repurposed for Climate/energy (health emergency), gun control (health emergency) propaganda and censorship, courts depriving citizens of constitutional rights, that have identified White Nationalists (whites who love their nation and constitution) as the biggest national security threat (not radicalized Islamists, actual Fascists or Marxists). Bush/Cheney crime family syndicates align with ShitLib Clinton/Obama/Biden crime family syndicates to this day against MAGA for that reason.
bin Laden was/is a ShitLib. And Fascist/Marxist. A CIA Bush/Dulles/Rockefeller/Carnegie/Morgan/Clinton/Windsor/Etc of horribles creation. A tool. To destroy western civilization as we know it. Used by much more power and evil people than him. Who hate individual liberty and freedom. Yet claim to be protectors of it.
Fascists + Communists both identify western liberal capitalist nations that value individual liberty and freedom as their most dangerous mutual enemy. It's why Hitler and Stalin signed their Pact with Secret Protocols.
Only their individual egos and ambitions got in the way. Don't worry, Fascists and Marxists learned from history: Don't break the Pact until supporters of individual liberty and freedom and western liberal capitalism is eliiminated. They can settle the spoils between themselves after the fact. Hence, Fascist George HW Bush becoming Communist China's "best friend ever in the White House."
I always thought of the Bush’s a bunch of oil-rich cowboys. Now I’m interested in reading more on the Bush dynasty and their level of global influence. Any books you’d recommend?
Which came from the work of a Carter-era DOJ Nazi hunter prosecutor, John Loftus, who gave this speech in Florida in 2000, at the same time that "hanging chads" were being counted in the state for the 2000 recount...which was directly responsible for the implementation of the hackable computer voting system that's criminalized transparency and audits. Coincidence?
Unholy Trinity: The Vatican, The Nazis, and the Swiss Banks
Also, this documentary features John DeCamp's revelations about the Franklin Cover-up and the tentacles that story has to very powerful people in national politics, including the Bush family. A Sound of Freedom of its time. DeCamp makes this comment in the final few minutes of the documentay, that rings very, very true in our times:
"If you can control about three or four key elements you can totally control a state. You can make right, wrong. You can make truth, falsehood. Falsehood, truth. If you control the media, if you control the justice department, if you control the police, you own the system."
Conspiracy Of Silence (Banned Discovery Channel Documentary)
"Conspiracy of Silence" is a powerful, disturbing documentary revealing a nationwide child abuse and pedophilia ring that leads to the highest levels of government. Featuring intrepid investigator John DeCamp"
Even a stopped clock is right twice a day. The Bush's and all of the American bankers and industrialists were all-in on Fascism and fanboi's of Hitler and Mussolini. Fact. Whether it comes from Guardian or C-SPAN or CNN or Rational Revolution or Stillness in the Storm or good old-fashioned books.
Pro tip: Evaluate information based on content, not source.
Bankers hedged their bets. After WW 1 when Germany was forced to pay reparations they set up international banking options. It's how Prescott Bush/Rockefeller, etc got tied into Hitler, became Hitler's banker. You should try looking at the information contained in the links, like the C-SPAN video details and the Guardian (stuck clock being right for a moment) get into. As well as the rest of the links I provided that show just how big the fan club was for Hitler/Mussolini and Fascism in general.
But from what I'm able to discern from your replies you're just interested in quick hit sniping from your perspective that has zero interest in being exposed to other information, questioning anything outside your preset ideas. Unless you decide to engage in actual dialogue that reflects you exploring the information presented to you then we have nothing else to share, I have no interest in engaging a closed mind.
Copies of originals degrade each time they're copied. The current Rockefeller's and Windsor's are poor reproductions of the originals. And Bush's.
Samuel Bush was a strong man, Prescott Bush was strong, but needed to be propped up by the Rockefeller's. GHW Bush degraded more, needed to be propped up by Dulles and the creation of a system to compensate for his 'wimpiness.' GW, Jeb, et al Bush's entirely need the system itself to be strong, they themselves are pathetic and weak men. When you get to the Jenna's and Barbara's and Jr's they're no better than your typical protester on college campuses who have no idea why they're protesting. But the system gives them privilege, talent and merit left the Bush family gene pool after GHW reproduced.
> bin Laden was(is?) a CIA creation. Any writings attributed to him passed through a CIA narrative control process. And a great many of his CIA handlers subscribe to ShitLib beliefs and values.
No, bin Laden was a US ally during the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan. Afterwards, he decided to attack his former ally. That's not at all the same thing as the CIA controlling him.
No. That's the cover story, narrative. bin Laden was a CIA asset working for enemies of our nation, like the Bush Family Crime Syndicate. 9-11 WAS an inside job. Done by our own government. Denial isn't a river in Egypt.
Maybe you've encountered the term before, but I don't think you understand how deep the concept of taqiyya goes in Islam. It's more than just Muslims feigning conversions to avoid being killed. Here in the west, we have a saying that the road to hell is paved with good intentions. In Islam, the secret intentions of one's heart justifies almost any action. Muslim clerics have no qualms about lying even to their own followers if they believe doing so will advance the cause of Islam. Take bin Laden's professions of belief in climate change and any other leftist causes with a massive grain of salt. The things he said to win the approval of western liberals do not align with what he taught jihadis. His only goal was to subject the entire world to Sharia whether by violence, honest persuasion, or deception.
Tend to agree with this in the case of Osama/Usama particularly (no idea about Arab Muslims on the average)— like a PUA guru he could sniff out which lines worked. This does not, at all, exclude the possibility that certain Free Mumia talking points personally appealed to him and resonated in his skull in certain ways on certain days; anyone who’s wasted enough hours of life reading political pilpul knows the feel. But barring non-English evidence to the contrary I doubt OBL/UBL pulled any of this gay climate change talk in late-night rap sessions among his own kind
What caused the youth to take note of his writings is the lack of patriotism of today, as opposed to back in the 2010's. No doubt he makes some valid points, but to have the population divided again, now over an issue like this cannot be good for the U.S. in the long run, as a cohesive state and society
It is the regime's oldest trick to conflate skepticism of war profiteering on the part of large corporations and other vested interests with a lack of patriotism. The anti-war left has consistently bought into this framing neutering their cause and paving the way for decades of war without unified opposition. The truth is that patriotism is love of country, not love of the current instantiation of a country's government. This is one of those pesky "populist narratives" our government is investing millions to suppress via the censorship industrial complex, however, so it is an open question the extent to which it can vault these barriers in order to more dramatically influence the electorate.
> It is the regime's oldest trick to conflate skepticism of war profiteering on the part of large corporations and other vested interests with a lack of patriotism.
Well, anti-patriots frequently use "skepticism of war profiteering" as cover. And frankly the "war profiteering driving policy" narrative never made any economic sense. Wars tend to be rather economically destructive at least in the short term, thus it is always possible to make more money during peace time.
I can see that, and what drives policy is definitely multifactorial. Wars are definitely economically destructive, but good for transferring wealth when the volume of bureaucratic cash flows are high.
It's purpose is more than just "cash flow". It's to extract wealth from the poor, working, and middle-class transfer it to the oligarch class.
The "bonus" of war for the oligarchs is it also destroys the means of producing capital available to the underclasses. Too much prosperity breeds uppity proles.
They're most concerned about upstart upper middle class dynasties breaking into their "club", because they can only get there by rocking the boat. ex.: Bad Orange Man.
What caused the youth to take note of his writings is not the lack of patriotism. It's pure ignorance. Most of them weren't taught why 9/11 happened. Or what the stated reasons of the enemy were. They were taught we were attacked "because they hate or freedoms."
When they find out that such a simplistic understanding is wildly untrue, they are left with little defense when against the first piece of half baked bullshit comes along.
Since it was Bin Laden's plan to draw USMIL into the middle east to bleed America out, I think it is safe to say the woke USMIL falling in on the agenda of shitlibs is just a continuation of a long established trend.
And then we dismantled his entire organization and then ISIS once we became serious about it. Guess he miscalculated since the US is still by the far the indispensable global power with the strongest economy.
Of course he miscalculated, he's a shitlib. That said, he did make the GAE bleed, a lot. Self inflicted wounds mostly but 20-40T squandered is a monumental kick in the nuts for the American people, and nobody hates the American people more than shitlibs, no?
Yes, it does occur to me that neocons are shitlibs with a thin coat of paint, which is another way of saying the same thing. Bin Laden did the neocons a favor by fulfilling their hope for a terrorist attack to energize their cause as explained in their PNAC white paper.
>> Sure he was also a Islamist literalist who believed in Sharia <<
This is a Tautology. Every Muslim serious about practising his religion and who knows its tenets are "followers of Sharia". The word itself simply refers to the Sacred Law.
Also, it is a mistake to oversimplify the matter. The man studied Montgomery, de Gaulle & others. It was therefore speculated by many (including in the CIA task force whose sole purpose it was to try & "track him") that he was well versed in the thought of Mckinder & company.
It's easy to say "he got all his talking points from Chomsky & friends". The reality is that hailing from a Saudi billionaire family; he always had access to Top-Tier Western education. Therefore his depth of understanding is far greater (and the CIA blokes affirm this) than people assume.
bin Laden was(is?) a CIA creation. Any writings attributed to him passed through a CIA narrative control process. And a great many of his CIA handlers subscribe to ShitLib beliefs and values.
The Bush crime family dynasty is the most treasonist in US history, far surpassing Benedict Arnold. From patriarch Prescott Bush actions as "Hitler's Banker" until his bank was seized by feds in 1943 for trading with the enemy, to Prescott Bush's association with Dulles to recover his German war partner's blood-stained loot after the war as he established the CIA. Who brought son George HW Bush on as a young operative being groomed, who was Ft Worth CIA station asset on scene when JFK's head was blown away, who worked for Kissinger to ditch Taiwan in favor of the CCP as UN Ambassador. Who became the first US Ambassador in Beijing at the same time Kissinger helped Klaus Schwab establish the WEF, establishing a pact between the Fascists and Marxists (as Hitler and Stalin tried) to gradually eliminate selfish and dangerous western liberal capitalist freedom from the world. Who declared a New World Order was needed to save all humanity aligning Fascist and Marxist powers as he watched the CCP brutally crush the Tiananmen Square freedom movement, rewarding the CCP with MFN trade partner status, and accelerated the deindustrialization of the US to industrialize China. Who destabilized the Middle East, groomed bogey men like bin Laden. Who set a stable of ambitious sons into politics groomed to ascend as a permanent ruling dynasty. George W Bush selected to continue the destruction of the US, who used the CIA's groomed asset bin Laden as a scapegoat to attack the US and usher in the surveillance security police state targeting domestic political opposition, consolidated religious institutions under government surveillance and control, establishing a biosecurity state that were all necessary to produce the medical tyranny system we've experienced since 2020 that's easily repurposed for Climate/energy (health emergency), gun control (health emergency) propaganda and censorship, courts depriving citizens of constitutional rights, that have identified White Nationalists (whites who love their nation and constitution) as the biggest national security threat (not radicalized Islamists, actual Fascists or Marxists). Bush/Cheney crime family syndicates align with ShitLib Clinton/Obama/Biden crime family syndicates to this day against MAGA for that reason.
bin Laden was/is a ShitLib. And Fascist/Marxist. A CIA Bush/Dulles/Rockefeller/Carnegie/Morgan/Clinton/Windsor/Etc of horribles creation. A tool. To destroy western civilization as we know it. Used by much more power and evil people than him. Who hate individual liberty and freedom. Yet claim to be protectors of it.
Wilson was worse
Got your Federal Reserve from him and the WW1 followed by the Versailles Treaty
What about your favourite commie Roosevelt- WW2 , The New Deal and the UN
How about Lincoln- nasty
Fascists + Communists both identify western liberal capitalist nations that value individual liberty and freedom as their most dangerous mutual enemy. It's why Hitler and Stalin signed their Pact with Secret Protocols.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/234008336_The_Hitler-Stalin_pact_discussion_of_the_Non-Aggression_Treaty_and_the_secret_protocols
(Download full-text PDF for free)
Only their individual egos and ambitions got in the way. Don't worry, Fascists and Marxists learned from history: Don't break the Pact until supporters of individual liberty and freedom and western liberal capitalism is eliiminated. They can settle the spoils between themselves after the fact. Hence, Fascist George HW Bush becoming Communist China's "best friend ever in the White House."
Jesus!
I always thought of the Bush’s a bunch of oil-rich cowboys. Now I’m interested in reading more on the Bush dynasty and their level of global influence. Any books you’d recommend?
I'll get you pointed in the right direction with this article in this 2004 UK Guardian article:
How Bush's grandfather helped Hitler's rise to power
UK Guardian, September 5, 2004
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2004/sep/25/usa.secondworldwar
Which came from the work of a Carter-era DOJ Nazi hunter prosecutor, John Loftus, who gave this speech in Florida in 2000, at the same time that "hanging chads" were being counted in the state for the 2000 recount...which was directly responsible for the implementation of the hackable computer voting system that's criminalized transparency and audits. Coincidence?
Unholy Trinity: The Vatican, The Nazis, and the Swiss Banks
Sarasota Reading Festival
C-SPAN, November 11, 2000
https://www.c-span.org/video/?160639-1/unholy-trinity-vatican-nazis-swiss-banks (47:59)
(Discussion on Prescott Bush runs 20:44 - 34:44)
I wrote a stack about it in May, 2023
https://freedomfox.substack.com/p/knowing-the-true-adversary
More at:
The Bush Crime Family History | Prescott Bush Helped Nazis, Kennedy Assassination, Vietnam, Reagan Assassination Attempt, and more
February 26, 2016
https://stillnessinthestorm.com/2016/02/the-bush-crime-family-history-presco/
American supporters of the European Fascists
http://www.rationalrevolution.net/war/american_supporters_of_the_europ.htm
Also, this documentary features John DeCamp's revelations about the Franklin Cover-up and the tentacles that story has to very powerful people in national politics, including the Bush family. A Sound of Freedom of its time. DeCamp makes this comment in the final few minutes of the documentay, that rings very, very true in our times:
"If you can control about three or four key elements you can totally control a state. You can make right, wrong. You can make truth, falsehood. Falsehood, truth. If you control the media, if you control the justice department, if you control the police, you own the system."
Conspiracy Of Silence (Banned Discovery Channel Documentary)
"Conspiracy of Silence" is a powerful, disturbing documentary revealing a nationwide child abuse and pedophilia ring that leads to the highest levels of government. Featuring intrepid investigator John DeCamp"
https://archive.org/details/ConspiracyOfSilenceBannedDiscoveryChannelDocumentary
How George H.W. Bush became Beijing’s ‘old friend’ in the White House
CNN, December 1, 2018
https://edition.cnn.com/2018/12/01/asia/george-h-w-bush-china-intl/index.html
“There’s no doubt Beijing sees him as the best friend China has ever had in the White House"
The Guardian- ha ha - enough said
Even a stopped clock is right twice a day. The Bush's and all of the American bankers and industrialists were all-in on Fascism and fanboi's of Hitler and Mussolini. Fact. Whether it comes from Guardian or C-SPAN or CNN or Rational Revolution or Stillness in the Storm or good old-fashioned books.
Pro tip: Evaluate information based on content, not source.
I don't think Bankers were a fan of Hitler since his economic miracle was achieved by rejecting debt / usury International Bankers
Bankers hedged their bets. After WW 1 when Germany was forced to pay reparations they set up international banking options. It's how Prescott Bush/Rockefeller, etc got tied into Hitler, became Hitler's banker. You should try looking at the information contained in the links, like the C-SPAN video details and the Guardian (stuck clock being right for a moment) get into. As well as the rest of the links I provided that show just how big the fan club was for Hitler/Mussolini and Fascism in general.
But from what I'm able to discern from your replies you're just interested in quick hit sniping from your perspective that has zero interest in being exposed to other information, questioning anything outside your preset ideas. Unless you decide to engage in actual dialogue that reflects you exploring the information presented to you then we have nothing else to share, I have no interest in engaging a closed mind.
"and all of the American bankers and industrialists"
... I assume you're excepting all of the ones funding Lenin and Stalin?
I'm pretty sure they were one and the same. They played both sides. Both to hedge bets and profit off war between them, and the US/UK. War = Profit.
GHW Bush may have been a genuine power player. His sons? They're reliable pawns, hardly what I'd call a "dynasty."
Copies of originals degrade each time they're copied. The current Rockefeller's and Windsor's are poor reproductions of the originals. And Bush's.
Samuel Bush was a strong man, Prescott Bush was strong, but needed to be propped up by the Rockefeller's. GHW Bush degraded more, needed to be propped up by Dulles and the creation of a system to compensate for his 'wimpiness.' GW, Jeb, et al Bush's entirely need the system itself to be strong, they themselves are pathetic and weak men. When you get to the Jenna's and Barbara's and Jr's they're no better than your typical protester on college campuses who have no idea why they're protesting. But the system gives them privilege, talent and merit left the Bush family gene pool after GHW reproduced.
> bin Laden was(is?) a CIA creation. Any writings attributed to him passed through a CIA narrative control process. And a great many of his CIA handlers subscribe to ShitLib beliefs and values.
No, bin Laden was a US ally during the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan. Afterwards, he decided to attack his former ally. That's not at all the same thing as the CIA controlling him.
No. That's the cover story, narrative. bin Laden was a CIA asset working for enemies of our nation, like the Bush Family Crime Syndicate. 9-11 WAS an inside job. Done by our own government. Denial isn't a river in Egypt.
Isn't that just the cover story for the aliens that are controlling them?
Such a witty "conspiracy theory" debunker you are....Not. Stay ignorant, chump.
Why can't you see the alien influence? Seriously, wake up.
I block morons.
Maybe you've encountered the term before, but I don't think you understand how deep the concept of taqiyya goes in Islam. It's more than just Muslims feigning conversions to avoid being killed. Here in the west, we have a saying that the road to hell is paved with good intentions. In Islam, the secret intentions of one's heart justifies almost any action. Muslim clerics have no qualms about lying even to their own followers if they believe doing so will advance the cause of Islam. Take bin Laden's professions of belief in climate change and any other leftist causes with a massive grain of salt. The things he said to win the approval of western liberals do not align with what he taught jihadis. His only goal was to subject the entire world to Sharia whether by violence, honest persuasion, or deception.
Tend to agree with this in the case of Osama/Usama particularly (no idea about Arab Muslims on the average)— like a PUA guru he could sniff out which lines worked. This does not, at all, exclude the possibility that certain Free Mumia talking points personally appealed to him and resonated in his skull in certain ways on certain days; anyone who’s wasted enough hours of life reading political pilpul knows the feel. But barring non-English evidence to the contrary I doubt OBL/UBL pulled any of this gay climate change talk in late-night rap sessions among his own kind
👍
What caused the youth to take note of his writings is the lack of patriotism of today, as opposed to back in the 2010's. No doubt he makes some valid points, but to have the population divided again, now over an issue like this cannot be good for the U.S. in the long run, as a cohesive state and society
It is the regime's oldest trick to conflate skepticism of war profiteering on the part of large corporations and other vested interests with a lack of patriotism. The anti-war left has consistently bought into this framing neutering their cause and paving the way for decades of war without unified opposition. The truth is that patriotism is love of country, not love of the current instantiation of a country's government. This is one of those pesky "populist narratives" our government is investing millions to suppress via the censorship industrial complex, however, so it is an open question the extent to which it can vault these barriers in order to more dramatically influence the electorate.
Real American patriots would realise that every war you entered was not to benefit the American people
For the most part, they do.
General Smedley Butler's (ret.) ghost approves of these comments.
> It is the regime's oldest trick to conflate skepticism of war profiteering on the part of large corporations and other vested interests with a lack of patriotism.
Well, anti-patriots frequently use "skepticism of war profiteering" as cover. And frankly the "war profiteering driving policy" narrative never made any economic sense. Wars tend to be rather economically destructive at least in the short term, thus it is always possible to make more money during peace time.
I can see that, and what drives policy is definitely multifactorial. Wars are definitely economically destructive, but good for transferring wealth when the volume of bureaucratic cash flows are high.
Bureaucratic cash flows have been high even in peace time. And in peace time, you don't have to worry about defeat.
It's purpose is more than just "cash flow". It's to extract wealth from the poor, working, and middle-class transfer it to the oligarch class.
The "bonus" of war for the oligarchs is it also destroys the means of producing capital available to the underclasses. Too much prosperity breeds uppity proles.
They're most concerned about upstart upper middle class dynasties breaking into their "club", because they can only get there by rocking the boat. ex.: Bad Orange Man.
> It's to extract wealth from the poor, working, and middle-class transfer it to the oligarch class.
They've been doing that via civilian means for decades.
What caused the youth to take note of his writings is not the lack of patriotism. It's pure ignorance. Most of them weren't taught why 9/11 happened. Or what the stated reasons of the enemy were. They were taught we were attacked "because they hate or freedoms."
When they find out that such a simplistic understanding is wildly untrue, they are left with little defense when against the first piece of half baked bullshit comes along.
Why did 911 happen then? And who by ?
> They were taught we were attacked "because they hate or freedoms."
Which is basically true, even if somewhat simplified. Of course, that's not really what they were taught, since the leftist teachers hated Bush.
Your cohesive days are long gone (never to return)
An alternate take is Bin Laden cynically used Leftist talking points to capture the support of American Leftists.
Shitlibs are their own worst enemy. Next they will rehabilitate Hitler, the poor oppressed starving artist.
These are the people regular liberals are so afraid of, that they have let shitlib wokesters take over our institutions?
Institutions have been taken over by design
Frankfurt School, Fabianism etc
Since it was Bin Laden's plan to draw USMIL into the middle east to bleed America out, I think it is safe to say the woke USMIL falling in on the agenda of shitlibs is just a continuation of a long established trend.
And then we dismantled his entire organization and then ISIS once we became serious about it. Guess he miscalculated since the US is still by the far the indispensable global power with the strongest economy.
Of course he miscalculated, he's a shitlib. That said, he did make the GAE bleed, a lot. Self inflicted wounds mostly but 20-40T squandered is a monumental kick in the nuts for the American people, and nobody hates the American people more than shitlibs, no?
Haven’t you heard of Neoconservatives?
Yes, it does occur to me that neocons are shitlibs with a thin coat of paint, which is another way of saying the same thing. Bin Laden did the neocons a favor by fulfilling their hope for a terrorist attack to energize their cause as explained in their PNAC white paper.
Or possibly Bin Laden was merely a patsy and had nothing to do with 911
Cui Bono
Yes, that is entirely possible.
Interesting stuff, but it would be better if you gave more examples/quotations besides just climate change.
I don't disagree with any of this. However, in his letter: Where's the lie?
Even a broken clock is right 2x a day.
Well "Climate change" is BS for starters.
Agree, but assuming he knew that, and was just parroting the globalist's own propaganda, are there any other lies?
Tim Osman was a CIA operative for years...his real name was Osama Bin Laden. Think about that...and wet your panties...
can someone explain to me whats going on with the far left?
like am I suppose to believe
a) their handlers decided it was time to suicide their public image and so, they called in "hey start chanting kill the jews"
b) the moderate left got annoyed with them and started baiting them with this palistain nonsense thinking they back down
c) china controls zoomer opinion so well, they got osama bin laden trending
like these all seem absurd but I don't understand how you could get people to read osama bin laden, he clearly cant be paying for his own marketing.
> their handlers
They don't really have handlers. Mostly they follow the logic of their ideology.
>> Sure he was also a Islamist literalist who believed in Sharia <<
This is a Tautology. Every Muslim serious about practising his religion and who knows its tenets are "followers of Sharia". The word itself simply refers to the Sacred Law.
Also, it is a mistake to oversimplify the matter. The man studied Montgomery, de Gaulle & others. It was therefore speculated by many (including in the CIA task force whose sole purpose it was to try & "track him") that he was well versed in the thought of Mckinder & company.
It's easy to say "he got all his talking points from Chomsky & friends". The reality is that hailing from a Saudi billionaire family; he always had access to Top-Tier Western education. Therefore his depth of understanding is far greater (and the CIA blokes affirm this) than people assume.