Is Violence the Answer?
I was listening to a podcast recently where a prominent commentator tried, for hours on end, to explain the true depths of the evil of our elites… The real ones, the ones I shouldn’t even name here… The ones who have laws against identifying them and even now are implicated in countless documented cases of systematic government backed (and explicit or defacto US backed) rape, torture and sexual abuse against civilians and children… into the thousands if not tens of thousands of instances, still ongoing.
And if you notice that that doesn’t even narrow it down, and that there are several groups that could be identified… that indeed you do not even know whether I’m talking about Northern Europe, small Countries in the Near-East, a certain Conflict in Eastern Europe, the New York-Caribbean Corridor, the San-Francisco Hollywood corridor, or the Cartel lands at the border… Ya that’s the point.
This commentator continued laying out the depth of the conscious intentional evil of the ideological, religious, and identitarian motives that intersect to form the pure evil that now control western governments and more or less openly state in their writings that they’d more or less like to see the death or slavery of Productive white westerners and their children…
And still, dear reader, you don’t know whether I’m referring to a commentator who was attacking Queer-Extremism, Islamic/Anti-Colonialist Fundamentalism, Talmudic Revisionist Zionism, Managerial Crypto-Communism, “New World Order” Davos-Totalitarianism, or the Mexican drug and sex trafficking cartels…
And yes, that’s the point. (and no I don’t think any one of these, to the extent they may or may not exist as described, could be said to be controlling or responcible for the others)
.
But he raged and raged, and brought receipts for the narrow particular group he (Accurately) identified as having basically sworn themselves to evil and as actively using the apparatuses of multiple governments to kill, maim, and sexually abuse adults and children… by the tens of thousands…
.
Then he ended “I don’t know what to do, but violence is not the answer”
.
Think about that:
“Violence is not the Answer”
VIOLENCE IS THE VERY QUESTION!
Violence is being used and employed in a state backed manner, explicitly and defacto, against tens if not hundreds of thousands of INNOCENT CHILDREN and their parents… in the most degrading, horrific and sexual manner… with escalating violence being employed against all who threaten to use ‘peaceful”, “Legal” means to resist or prevent the violence from occurring, against many of our coethnics, whether your co-ethnics and mine are the same or not….
and yet “Violence is not the answer”.
VIOLENCE IS ASSUMED!
Violence is the context us which all of this is happening.
Violence is the very premise on which we are discussing.
Violence is the very soil on which we walk stretching horizon to horizon without end.
Violence is the water from which we flow; the ocean in which we swim; the very air we breath, and the empty pitiless sky under-which we struggle.
The basis of all law, all governance, all society is violence.
per my previous piece:
The decisive factor of all of human history, the origin of the very meals that allowed human evolution, the basis of the first most basic economies, the origins of the first organized human society was the waging of war for mating slaves.
Indeed at the advent of Agriculture this single factor became so extreme that in many regions (notably Europe and most of Asia) at the height of early state/tribe formation and warfare 8,000 years ago, only 1 man reproduced for every 17 females, the successful warrior coalitions of men became so successful at killing/enslaving their rivals. And while the ratios did not remain so extreme this general trend continued for thousands of years until only the past few hundred (if that).
The centrality of Violence to human existence is so extreme that meat remains the healthiest meal for you, and your DNA betrays the extraordinary violent competition between human tribes.
You can read the accounts of the Greeks and Romans and the tribes they fought and how they treated their captured slaves for a basic understanding of how history works, has always worked, and how central this most fundamental competition is to human history.
You can read the history of Early Modern Europe and how the now restrained states still employed hundreds of thousands of men in the ruthless competition between states and non-state actors, and how the intimate tie of resource and sexual competition, now rerouted through the proxies of regular pay and state status granting removed the lion’s share of the sexual violence from warfare itself at its peak (soldiers instead hired women for sex at collapsed shockingly cheap rates), but it did not meaningfully alter the sexual competition…
Carved across every facet of your diet, your social bonds, your DNA, your instincts… Every iota of what is, will become, or will ever be thought of by you is the siren song of violence and war and the shadows cast by this blaring red sun of human history.
.
And what do western governments, our “morality”, our bankrupt religions say in response to sexual exploitation of allies and co-ethnics, the tyranny of illegitimate states, and the hubris of creatures (I will not call them men) who would call themselves your master… “violence is not the answer”
If that is the case then the very idea of any inalienable individual rights, any right of self defense, any right of rebellion or resistance against tyranny, any human dignity at all is assumed away. Man must everywhere and always be a slave to any master who would call himself such, as “violence is not the answer”. when a fraud, tyrant, or criminal who might simply assume to lie and assume the mantle… whatever mantle.
If that is the case then you are lower than any creature who has walked on two legs for the past 10,000 years.
.
Oversocialization has rendered you not man, but livestock, fit only to sleep and feed.
Some of you now are recoiling… But This is not an alien, monstrous value set I’ve somehow invented… These are the values of European civilization right up til the 1960s when the communists succeeded in replacing nobility of spirit with universalist “Brotherhood of Man” poison (as if the first brothers did not murder each-other).
Shakespeare’s greatest speech in his greatest play (no not “To be or Not to Be”) is a rousing ode to violence itself!
Hamlet, having hesitated at vengeance for the entire play and now forced into exile, stumbles upon an army of 20,000 men marching to a bloody massacre of a battle, and asking what they fight for, what great cause motivates such martial valor, is told… basically no reason at all.
The plot of land they fight over is so small and insignificant that it will be insufficient to bury the men who die in the battle.
Does Hamlet recoil in horror? Does he shake his head at the folly of man?
NO! This rouses him out of his oversocialized university educated melancholy! The linguistic poison of years of “moral philosophy” and “theology” learnt at school.
He is reminded of the greatness and honor of princely nobility, the glory and pride of his ancestors… That European kings are so great that they fight to the death not over any material concern but their immortal pride and honor.
“Finding quarrel even in a straw, when honor’s at the stake”
How then stands Hamlet? With father killed and mother stained? Who hesitates and whimpers at the prospect of vengeance and the violence necessary to restore his rightful position and the health of his family and kingdom?
How then stands you?
How then stands all the men of the west who whimper “Violence is not the answer”?
.
Notice that you’ve probably never close read this speech or Analysed it’s sentiment, maybe one of the best and most cogent looks into the spirit of European Nobility as it existed from 800ad to 1914.
How strange that gradeschool teachers are so keen to make young boys “empathize” and analyse Hamlets “To Be or Not to Be” and to explore his despairing contempation of suicide… but his subsequent rousing and affirmation of life and greatness? His phoenix-like return to nobility and daring intent? I’d be shocked if any readers remembered “What is Man” existed, despite being vastly more central to the plot, themes, and character of Hamlet than “To Be or Not to Be”.
Of course there is an obvious reason the matriarchy is so uninterested in the cry “My thoughts be bloody or be nothing worth”.
.
Indeed, western man’s predicament is similar to Hamlet’s. Ever keen to admire the great soldiers and men of past generations and the current generation, their nation and other nations, who’ve fought (and will fight) countless wars and battle in far flung plots, for territories and causes of dubious if not inscrutable purpose and logic…
Dozens of defining wars and battles of almost entirely no relevance and bearing to the young men who fought them themselves, let alone the boys admiring histories of the Napoleonic wars, or far flung theaters of the world wars, or Vietnam, or Desert Storm…
Admiring men who were not constrained only to rouse at a great cause, but greatly to fight for their nation and honor even when we well might criticize the pointlessness and vision of the actual conflict.
And yet like Hamlet, as young western men suffer outrages, tyrranies, and violations of almost unrecognizable horror.
Explicitly Legally reduced to second citizens and slaves in their own country in the name of “equality” and “antidiscrimination”.
Invaded by million strong hordes of hateful foreigners.
Burnings of their ancestral towns and businesses.
Murderous violence and sexual violations of their sisters and cousins…
And all with the tyrannical backing of governments it is not only KNOWN will do nothing to prevent it, but actively encourage it by regularly punishing victims who speak out about their rape worse than the offenders.
.
Yet like Hamlet the corruption complicity and conscious design of their tyrants deny them the script and social rails to fight this most grievous villainy. The Danish court would offer him all the guidance and encouragement in the world to go and fight a foreign enemy, but when the most traitorous foe wears the crown himself, the young man is left directionless seething and wondering… plotting, then doubting.
If it is still heroic to fight and die in some foreign war on no conceivable motive thousands of miles from home against a weaker enemy, with the backing and funding of hundreds of thousands if not millions (few Westerners in Hamlet’s time or now will dare call their soldiers unjustified murderers, cowardly following unjust orders) then how can striking against that most grievous and overwhelming tyranny at home, under one’s own motivation, be any less than the height of heroism?
And how can the doubts and hesitations of those young men be anything but understandable follies in the face of the greatest trials of will imaginable?
.
And yet Commentators and influencers and supposedly “Realistic” and “hard hearted” intellectuals intone, over and over, even from the extremes of the politcal fringe:
“Violence is not the answer”.
.
Of course violence is not the answer. Violence is the premise. The precondition. The natural state of all human affairs. The operant fact of what is being endured presently and always. The reality we live every day. The true God of this age and all other ages.
Violence is not the answer. It is the question eternally hanging in the air.
And the question answers itself.
.
Follow me on Twitter: @FromKulak
Tip:
BITCOIN: bc1qdhj7637sgcssxgxygjaa3ddljwy8tzg5mzw325
MONERO: 8AhA3g9hbtDcAJE5MPmeQsFwwGsf3H9fq9tC6giQ4a6vKnTXv4J4MivKXrPKDpXyEeNc9mfFejbq84kSWkC8pjuj18rAEij
Follow me on Twitter: @FromKulak
The civilised man attempts in the first instance to resolve disputes without violence, but only a fool (or a saint, or a coward) denies himself recourse to it if it proves necessary.
“Anyone who clings to the historically untrue -- and thoroughly immoral -- doctrine that 'violence never settles anything' I would advise to conjure up the ghosts of Napoleon Bonaparte and of the Duke of Wellington and let them debate it. The ghost of Hitler could referee, and the jury might well be the Dodo, the Great Auk, and the Passenger Pigeon. Violence, naked force, has settled more issues in history than has any other factor, and the contrary opinion is wishful thinking at its worst. Breeds that forget this basic truth have always paid for it with their lives and freedoms.”
- Lt. Col. Jean V. Dubois ~ Starship Troopers (the book, not the suckass movie)