"Like bucks who, when the doe has lead them together for their battle, are broken up and prevented from fighting by some insane peacenik old lady..."
First rule of clown world- no matter how retarded you predict things will get, they will get even more retarded. Toxic masculinity and rape culture in the duck pond:
"That the only thing they could consistently do is make the unherdable cats act ever more like unherdable cats…"
Years ago a researcher looked into what made people turn far-right/ anti-immigrant. There seems to be a button that gets pushed in peoples' heads, allowing most humans to suddenly acquire behavioral traits that make them suspicious of foreigners and to increase efforts at creating in-group uniformity. I'm sure those at the top have read this or similar, as "how-to fight the right" manuals often mention trying to create wedges in groups.
"When and Why Nationalism Beats Globalism" The American Interest
by JONATHAN HAIDT July 10th, 2016
"In 2005 Stenner published a book called The Authoritarian Dynamic, an academic work full of graphs, descriptions of regression analyses, and discussions of scholarly disputes over the nature of authoritarianism. (It therefore has not had a wide readership.) Her core finding is that authoritarianism is not a stable personality trait. It is rather a psychological predisposition to become intolerant when the person perceives a certain kind of threat. It’s as though some people have a button on their foreheads, and when the button is pushed, they suddenly become intensely focused on defending their in-group, kicking out foreigners and non-conformists, and stamping out dissent within the group. At those times they are more attracted to strongmen and the use of force. At other times, when they perceive no such threat, they are not unusually intolerant. So the key is to understand what pushes that button.
The answer, Stenner suggests, is what she calls “normative threat,” which basically means a threat to the integrity of the moral order (as they perceive it). It is the perception that “we” are coming apart:"
=
"...consistently, anything that touches on violence… No matter how little reach it generates, or how little engagement it gets, always… Always… ALWAYS. Somehow generates a “glowie”..."
I used to be on a private chat for Nat Socs, and the opposite came up in an even more obvious way. We were older, long-time Nat Socs so the threads were mostly about exercise, gardening, neighborhood outreach, family stuff, etc. Yet every time there was a violent Happening, there would be a handful of accounts writing a block of text about the need to do stuff now and blow stuff up. Hysterical calls to violence. I'd check the accounts, and they'd be 1+ years old with single digit # of posts, all of them similar calls to hand out promotions to the FBI immediately after a Happening.
Maybe something changed since then, or just different tactics for different situations (private server vs. public.)
=
I'm not sure 117 IQ is a magic cut-off, as it seems to be something outside but probably related to IQ. I know average people who can still calculate if something in reality is true or false while ignoring media screeching. I know very intelligent people who still believe every aspect of Current Thing; they can logically debate complex work-related issues, but when it turns to politics they are retarded. More accurately, they are LLMs:
I'm in an odd place after reading this article, because I don't disagree with what you say. Yet at the same time, I'm not sure I come up with the same conclusions.
Government is really good at crushing spontaneous violent dissent, i.e. a 'chimpout.' This is why it intentionally provokes such things. The Left was in a constant state of chimping out for several decades, up to the 70s or so. Massive violence. Yet today few even remember it happened.
Government is bad at crushing opposing governmental organizations. See: organized crime, every successful revolution you mention, almost all wars since both governments still existed afterwards even if diminished or subjugated, etc.
Chimping doesn't even work for the Left. What works is having chimping and protests to give moral cover for politicians who already agree with their goals but cannot implement them w/o a cassus belli. If chimping worked by itself, a darky would be emperor of the world.
Furthermore, I don't think our audience is the chimping kind. It seems like the target audience for chimping are the LLM-people I linked above in that X-tweet. None of them will be on our side until after we win.
I agree that we shouldn't counter-signal calls, but I disagree that random violence will achieve much of value. When Mao said, "political power comes from the barrel of a gun," he meant that violence and organization needed to be wedded in order to push towards your goals. Either by itself is useless.
Wow, this was an incredible post. Absolutely. We rule out violence and thus assure elites that they can continue abusing us. We need violence. Brits need to murder the foreigners that are raping their children. Judges that allow blacks to commit dozens of murders in their lifetimes need to be hanged. If the system won’t grant us justice, then we need to exert it ourself. We’ve all been propagandized into believing that all forms of violence (except those against white people) are morally bankrupt and signs of mental illness. It’s time to break that spell.
I agree. The slant is particularly *against* White people organizing.
I think of all the Old Spice commercials. Old Spice was once the quintessential old White guy aftershave. But now the commercials all make the White guy some pussy. While the black guy is strong and assertive. It couldn't be more obvious.
Had to verify my age in order to comment by taking a selfie. Perhaps even funnier is that I was able to read it in the email version, just couldn't comment on the app.
It's also easier to demoralize whites because we know we're the only demographic that will have the absolute full force of the law thrown at them for any real or even perceived violations.
We need to subvert the subversion. My proposed New internet rule: Anyone who unironically yells "glowie" towards those legitimately calling for violence against the enemies of Europeans is a glowie bot at best. Block. Remove and then Continue plotting violence against our enemies. Also, get behind closed doors, and make some shit happen. Heads need to roll, or at the very least be vacated of their contents at 300 yds. Pick your targets. Local govt. Pencil pusher. Etc are all legit. If your local govt stooge cannot feel safe at work, or home, and they shouldn't, then soon govt. Starts to dry up, the machinery starts to break down.
Reverse the definition of fed posting? Say only feds call for non-violence?
No, it has to be bypassed, and then reversing the definition used as a defense to fight the inevitable swarm of glowniggers. How to bypass Meta and X and how get it to achieve critical mass to where they can’t stop it.
Some of the stuff said about that stupid dyke getting shot in Minneapolis is so extreme it makes me think we are close. We just need to get the women saying it too. A lot of Gen Z women are starting to bray for blood. With the reels on instagram… maybe if we can overcome the algorithm long enough. I think it’s a switch that once flipped in white man’s head, will not be so easy to turn off. Reels would be the most powerful format to get it through. Once the white man wakes up it’s all over.
I definitely do say "people are too comfortable" for exactly the reasons laid out in this essay: Civilisational breakdown hasn't hit a lot of wealthier/older people yet, so they still think things are ticking along and the idea of a massive revolution is horrifying and risky to them.
When that ceases to be the case I think we'll have your routine calls for violence and praising of the glorious dead.
"Like bucks who, when the doe has lead them together for their battle, are broken up and prevented from fighting by some insane peacenik old lady..."
First rule of clown world- no matter how retarded you predict things will get, they will get even more retarded. Toxic masculinity and rape culture in the duck pond:
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/W2p5Gm2FAUM
===
"That the only thing they could consistently do is make the unherdable cats act ever more like unherdable cats…"
Years ago a researcher looked into what made people turn far-right/ anti-immigrant. There seems to be a button that gets pushed in peoples' heads, allowing most humans to suddenly acquire behavioral traits that make them suspicious of foreigners and to increase efforts at creating in-group uniformity. I'm sure those at the top have read this or similar, as "how-to fight the right" manuals often mention trying to create wedges in groups.
"When and Why Nationalism Beats Globalism" The American Interest
by JONATHAN HAIDT July 10th, 2016
"In 2005 Stenner published a book called The Authoritarian Dynamic, an academic work full of graphs, descriptions of regression analyses, and discussions of scholarly disputes over the nature of authoritarianism. (It therefore has not had a wide readership.) Her core finding is that authoritarianism is not a stable personality trait. It is rather a psychological predisposition to become intolerant when the person perceives a certain kind of threat. It’s as though some people have a button on their foreheads, and when the button is pushed, they suddenly become intensely focused on defending their in-group, kicking out foreigners and non-conformists, and stamping out dissent within the group. At those times they are more attracted to strongmen and the use of force. At other times, when they perceive no such threat, they are not unusually intolerant. So the key is to understand what pushes that button.
The answer, Stenner suggests, is what she calls “normative threat,” which basically means a threat to the integrity of the moral order (as they perceive it). It is the perception that “we” are coming apart:"
=
"...consistently, anything that touches on violence… No matter how little reach it generates, or how little engagement it gets, always… Always… ALWAYS. Somehow generates a “glowie”..."
I used to be on a private chat for Nat Socs, and the opposite came up in an even more obvious way. We were older, long-time Nat Socs so the threads were mostly about exercise, gardening, neighborhood outreach, family stuff, etc. Yet every time there was a violent Happening, there would be a handful of accounts writing a block of text about the need to do stuff now and blow stuff up. Hysterical calls to violence. I'd check the accounts, and they'd be 1+ years old with single digit # of posts, all of them similar calls to hand out promotions to the FBI immediately after a Happening.
Maybe something changed since then, or just different tactics for different situations (private server vs. public.)
=
I'm not sure 117 IQ is a magic cut-off, as it seems to be something outside but probably related to IQ. I know average people who can still calculate if something in reality is true or false while ignoring media screeching. I know very intelligent people who still believe every aspect of Current Thing; they can logically debate complex work-related issues, but when it turns to politics they are retarded. More accurately, they are LLMs:
https://x.com/Devon_Eriksen_/status/2009393479886004403
=
I'm in an odd place after reading this article, because I don't disagree with what you say. Yet at the same time, I'm not sure I come up with the same conclusions.
Government is really good at crushing spontaneous violent dissent, i.e. a 'chimpout.' This is why it intentionally provokes such things. The Left was in a constant state of chimping out for several decades, up to the 70s or so. Massive violence. Yet today few even remember it happened.
https://status451.com/2017/01/20/days-of-rage/
Government is bad at crushing opposing governmental organizations. See: organized crime, every successful revolution you mention, almost all wars since both governments still existed afterwards even if diminished or subjugated, etc.
Chimping doesn't even work for the Left. What works is having chimping and protests to give moral cover for politicians who already agree with their goals but cannot implement them w/o a cassus belli. If chimping worked by itself, a darky would be emperor of the world.
Furthermore, I don't think our audience is the chimping kind. It seems like the target audience for chimping are the LLM-people I linked above in that X-tweet. None of them will be on our side until after we win.
I agree that we shouldn't counter-signal calls, but I disagree that random violence will achieve much of value. When Mao said, "political power comes from the barrel of a gun," he meant that violence and organization needed to be wedded in order to push towards your goals. Either by itself is useless.
That clip is incredible...
Days of rage is a great book btw.
Wow, this was an incredible post. Absolutely. We rule out violence and thus assure elites that they can continue abusing us. We need violence. Brits need to murder the foreigners that are raping their children. Judges that allow blacks to commit dozens of murders in their lifetimes need to be hanged. If the system won’t grant us justice, then we need to exert it ourself. We’ve all been propagandized into believing that all forms of violence (except those against white people) are morally bankrupt and signs of mental illness. It’s time to break that spell.
Also, invoking RTW’s Screeching Women is S-tier.
You know nothing about BDSM romance in Desert Storm but this was a banger of an essay.
Sometimes I compose a sentence... And then I realize that no one else in human history would have composed that sentence had I not done so.
Great piece!
I agree. The slant is particularly *against* White people organizing.
I think of all the Old Spice commercials. Old Spice was once the quintessential old White guy aftershave. But now the commercials all make the White guy some pussy. While the black guy is strong and assertive. It couldn't be more obvious.
It's all programming, all the way down... 😐
Blessings and appreciation from Sydney Australia.
Thankyou!
Persuasive. And it matches the disconnect between online and offline conversations that I’ve been experiencing.
I thought you might be amused to know that this essay was blocked by an age-gate in the Yookay.
That is something. So like do you have to use a VPN?
Had to verify my age in order to comment by taking a selfie. Perhaps even funnier is that I was able to read it in the email version, just couldn't comment on the app.
It's also easier to demoralize whites because we know we're the only demographic that will have the absolute full force of the law thrown at them for any real or even perceived violations.
But that's what the glowie would say. Not that he's lying
I don't always agree with your takes, but dang it....I do appreciate the autistic-level detail you bring to your arguments.
And here people said I'd never use my philosophy degree.
We need to subvert the subversion. My proposed New internet rule: Anyone who unironically yells "glowie" towards those legitimately calling for violence against the enemies of Europeans is a glowie bot at best. Block. Remove and then Continue plotting violence against our enemies. Also, get behind closed doors, and make some shit happen. Heads need to roll, or at the very least be vacated of their contents at 300 yds. Pick your targets. Local govt. Pencil pusher. Etc are all legit. If your local govt stooge cannot feel safe at work, or home, and they shouldn't, then soon govt. Starts to dry up, the machinery starts to break down.
The Arab Spring failed tho
It succeeded in dethroning two governments, plus possibly a third if you count the recent fall of syria.
Good piece. Persuasive.
The obvious retort: Then why do you hide behind an avatar?
It begs suspicion. Idk. Maybe this has already been volleyed at you in the social media arenas. I don’t know because I don’t exist in those spaces.
Regardless, excellent arguments. Well done.
Well stated piece.
Also true.
Speaking from experience.
Reverse the definition of fed posting? Say only feds call for non-violence?
No, it has to be bypassed, and then reversing the definition used as a defense to fight the inevitable swarm of glowniggers. How to bypass Meta and X and how get it to achieve critical mass to where they can’t stop it.
Some of the stuff said about that stupid dyke getting shot in Minneapolis is so extreme it makes me think we are close. We just need to get the women saying it too. A lot of Gen Z women are starting to bray for blood. With the reels on instagram… maybe if we can overcome the algorithm long enough. I think it’s a switch that once flipped in white man’s head, will not be so easy to turn off. Reels would be the most powerful format to get it through. Once the white man wakes up it’s all over.
Just tried to follow you on X. You are suspended.
As foretold.
Really!? thhat is interesting. Which country are you looking at it from?
I've received no notification that I'm suspended so they might have a ghost suspending methanism to suppress people
If anyone wants to check this is my account.
https://x.com/FromKulak
Not suspended. Now following on X. This article is very good.
Not suspended. -🇩🇰
My mistake, my search found a page called “@CatgirlKulak” that IS suspended, not your “@FromKulak”
Sincere apology and best regards
I definitely do say "people are too comfortable" for exactly the reasons laid out in this essay: Civilisational breakdown hasn't hit a lot of wealthier/older people yet, so they still think things are ticking along and the idea of a massive revolution is horrifying and risky to them.
When that ceases to be the case I think we'll have your routine calls for violence and praising of the glorious dead.