Cry Havoc and Bray for Blood

On the Importance of Womanly Screeching

You’ve never done anything
You’d never do anything
You’re mentally unwell
No one’s listening to you
You’re wasting your life shouting into the wind
You should feel embarrassed
Touch Grass
Nothing ever happens
Nothing will happen
You’re going to do nothing
No one’s going to do anything
You’re an [insert identity]
No one cares

“Marc Antony’s Oration at Caesar’s Funeral” by George Edward Robertson

NOTE: Everything that follows I wrote BEFORE the minneapolis ICE Shooting of that Lesbian woman. Even the ending. So relating the two and commenting on the specific event I leave as an exercise to my readers.

The Paradox of “Indifference”

Dear reader… I have a lot of bad takes. A shocking number of bad takes. An embarrassing number of bad takes…

The funny thing is, none of these are the ones people say are bad takes.

When you compose lots of tweets and articles and mini-essays and actual essays, and podcasts…. you inevitably have good and bad takes, Essays, and Tweets especially, follow a power law distribution. The most important thing in a lot of tweets is what is NOT in the tweet.
With a maximum of 4 images and 280 characters, a tweet’s power largely depends on its ability to reference larger concepts, and bigger cultural touchstones in some unexpected manner, and join them in some meaningful way. Sometimes your risque sexual observation, rephrasing of a Kipling poem, invocation of 90s anime, and reference to Obama Era Urban Food Policy… All line up perfectly with the absurd visual, and you get 12 MILLION IMPRESSIONS and you can cover your rent for the month on the Elon-Bucks from that one tweet.

More often however your particular observation involving an 80s Czechoslovak horror movie, Samuel Richardson’s 18th century BDSM novel Clarissa, Operation Desert storm, and 3OH!3’s collaboration with Ke$ha…

No one gets it.

You put it out physically giggling. Conclude that it’s your masterpiece. Hit tweet. And then it sits there getting no engagement at all after 1000 impressions, only to finally get its first like from some Malaysian who thinks your Profile Pic is hot, and doesn’t speak English to realize that you’re retarded.

This is how it works… Spray and pray. Only a very few rare things you do are going to be hits, and you just have to accept that even a SUPER-MAJORITY of your best effort, is going to come to nothing.

Then you quietly delete the most ill-conceived confusing messes no one cared about.

.

You know what never happens?

People don’t show up to comment “No one gets it”, “Another miss”, “You aren’t funny”, “You’re wasting your life on Twitter” [as they tweet at you], “No one loves you”, “You never get laid”, “you’re a whore”, “you know nothing about BDSM Romance in Desert Storm, nor how that relates to the Czech Surrealism”, “No one cares”

The Czech “Alice in Wonderland”… One of the most terrifying films ever made. [Full Film on Youtube]… My repetoir of references is very eclectic.

When you are actually wasting your time and getting no traction, Not a soul alive is going waste their own time EVEN MORE-SO to sit there and commentate your embarrassment and failure.

Think about it, No matter how much Jehovah’s Witnesses or street preachers are wasting their lives and no one is listening, you’d be wasting your life even more so to sit there trying to persuade them of that fact.

Indeed the ONLY times you’ll EVER get comments like these… Is when you ARE getting traction.

It’s really amazing! Countless times you’ll tweet or post something you thought was clever, insightful, drole, important, philosophically or spiritually relevant… And nothing.

Then one of them Moon-Shoots, takes off to 6, 8, 10 MILLION impressions, 10s of thousands of likes…, thousands of retweets… And suddenly THAT ONE you start getting “No one cares”.

I’ve seen THOUSANDS of comments, “No one cares” “you’re weird for caring” all on the same tweet, RETWEETS from accounts with a MILLION followers “Who cares what this person thinks!? No one’s listening to them” They tweet out to a million people.

YOU DO!

Otherwise you would have just kept scrolling.

Its actually really remarkable the amount of effort, collective work, and social organization that goes into this.

I’ve seen Tweets with THOUSANDS OF COMMENTS, getting hundreds of retweets and hundreds of comments that “No one cares”… Sometimes these retweets themselves get comments and conversations going in circles “These people really think we care what they think?”, “I know right? They’re obsessed with us, as if we care” and if you’re looking closely you can actually see various followers of the people who “don’t care”, Comment themselves that they “don’t care” beneath their favorite E-Celebrity “not caring” that they also “don’t care”, and then follow their way back to your original tweet to say “We don’t care”, before Retweeting you themselves to say “God, these people. They actually think we care!?”

Indeed there’s an entire MEME FORMAT —the only meme as far as I can tell the left has ever successfully created for themselves— That exists solely to express that they “don’t care”

“Giant Thumb Guy”, Look at us Cool people in our group collective, and you outside it, and how we just barely acknowledge you then go back to ignoring you.

You see you can tell it’s a leftist meme format because they didn’t use any wojaks or existing memes… Also it’s poorly constructed and uses a redundant three panel format that has been on its way out in memes since 2015.

I’ve seen various leftists create elaborate Photoshops of this meme… Just to respond how little they care, because that’s what you do when don’t care.

Now admit it, Can you tell a redditor created this? Look at the alt-text that came embedded in the image. (No I don’t actually know what Guilty Gear is…but we’ll be charitable and assume its just a fun and well enough written game and not barely concealed porn)

And of course other times their innate violent impulses infect the meme:

Because escalating immediatley from words to threats of violence shows how cool and unconcerned you are.

“But Kulak!?” I hear you say, in a bout of inner-Redditor cleverness, “You’re a hypocrite! You clearly care too! You’ve written this entire piece so far just going on about how you don’t care, about them not caring, about your thing that you did that they didn’t care about!!! Would you have done that if you don’t care?! A-Ha! We got you!”

Ugh… Of course I care. This is fascinating. My anthropological instincts are tickled to the core!

Simply fascinating.

My working hypothesis is that leftists, a wide cross-section of women, effeminate men, the SSRI’d, men who’ve suffered genital trauma, the unintelligent, the weak willed, and just generally those of poor inner conviction, reason, hormonal health, and disagreeable virtue (but then I’ve repeated myself many times now)… Interpret their emotions and ideas via a complex communicative social environment they maintain with each-other.

Their minds and reasoning depends on a group, or longhouse, or “Community”, or “friends”… whereas the superior Chad, Chadette, Chud, and Chudette western autists are able to forgo, for extended periods, any need for such a social mental framework or even forego such “friends” and “community” entirely.

Thus, like the apex predators they are, these noble solitary creatures are able to rely upon their own superior reason and judgement. Inside of you are two wolves… and one of them is fallacious and gay, and the superior rational man should ignore him.

Get the behind me Satan. This wolf walks alone.

However for those unfortunate souls who, via accident of birth, one too many crack benders, or boomer senility, slip below the superior threshold of 117 IQ and above, and instead fall into the midwit tier of 116 and beneath— Or who develop the crippling spiritual and hormonal condition known as “Being a Pussy”— True logical reason and inner resolve becomes an impossibility.

Thus their noble solitary apex existence as rational animals ends or never truly begins… And they outsource their thinking. They pass their judgement from the Godlike rational faculties and individual instincts passed down to them via blood memory from their rapey/homicidal Heroic War-God Ancestors… and instead entrust their thinking to a “Longhouse” or “Society” or “Experts” or “Being Normal” or “Getting a Job”.

But in order to outsource your thinking and feeling to a group, you need to actually be communicating your thoughts and “talking about your feelings” back and forth. (this may be an incomprehensible and unbelievably alien experience to civilized rational superior people such as yourself dear reader, but I can assure you, from my own terrified observation of this revoltingly obscene and antediluvianly primitive ritual, it does happen… they do talk about their feelings)

.

Thus we get the absurdities of networks of hundreds of people communicating, coordinating, organizing, and messaging each-other, following links, and returning to threads and tweets all to tell each-other, and inform others, and inform you that “They don’t care”.

Lacking judgement, intelligence, logic, will, or resolve of their own… the presence of any sufficient irritant or effective logical messaging will agitate them and beget a cognitive dissonance.

They do care, but with sufficient social effort and mutual social enforcement they can make themselves “Not Care”… And more importantly, they intuit that by repeating this over and over insistently with memes, they can make other people not care… Since, obviously, if they saw everyone around them aggressively insisting they didn’t care, they’d feel subconsciously compelled to follow the herd and cease caring themselves. It’d be too socially dangerous and low status to care. And intuitively they experience such social danger and low status the same way superior 117 IQ autistic super-geniuses experience being wrong itself. Just as you would not repeat an obvious lie and would argue against a wicked absurdity… They will find it the height of moral and spiritual wrongness to “Care” about something their social reality has decided doesn’t matter or that only bad people care about, and they will rally their fellows in response to any cognitive dissonance, especially in the event that it appears to be receiving support or interest from a group of people.

The greatest threat is that a rivaled faction, or critical mass of people will form an opinion or “care” such that the weak willed starts to feel social pressure to accept the offending idea… Thus the absurdity that the MORE something is obviously gaining traction and has a lot of interest… the More aggressively and insistently such vast networks need to loudly and aggressively “Not Care”.

Thus, Like Children watching Dragon Ball Z and throwing their hands in the air to send their energy to Goku for his spirit bomb… Or the Longnecks extending and straining to make the sun return in The Land Before Time X: The Great Longneck Migration. By the combined effort of their psychic and social compliance, they may defeat the threat of anyone “Caring”.

.

What a strange sociological reality.

This dear Readers is what i Call “The Paradox of Indifference”.

.

The Supreme Exception

I was rather proud of my little exercise in anthropology and social psychology. My extraordinary confusion and bemusement that only when I actually was gaining traction and getting talked about by millions, that only THEN would people show up to comment that they “Don’t Care” now had an explanation.

This also explained several in person conversations across the years where after an extended and decent enough conversation, I’d finally get my interlocutor in a true lock where they’d have to admit I was right, and accept my conclusion, or abandon one of their core values… Only for them to suddenly and finally insist “I don’t care”, in an animated and angry manner that immediately communicated they did care, implied you were some freak who was “obsessed”, and they deeply resented you for damaging their comfort and beliefs… (Now, too be fair, at least one or two times I was genuinely autistically pestering the person, but this was very much the minority of instances… They just couldn’t deal with facts and logic).

The conclusion was tidy, simple, amazingly funny, and really quite explanatory once you started looking for it.

The Paradox of indifference: That the “Appeal to Triviality” or “Appeal to Indifference” is a marker of attempted social manipulation and status regulation, and conveys not indifference, but indeed DEEP CONCERN. The unconcern expressed is always ANTI-CORRELATED with how concerned the speaker is.

If they really didn’t care, they would not be commenting on the matter. In the same way I’m sure that none of my readers troll the Harry Potter Erotica Forums to tell horny femcel shut ins that they’re completely delusional freaks, and no one cares about their stupid Luna-Lupin fanfic. You’d have to really CARE about Harry Potter Erotica to do that. Besides you don’t need to do it because it’s already so stupid it doesn’t warrant such a comment… I mean her name is a Moon and he is a Werewolf. How the hell is that going to work Cindy?!

.

Yet if you are in the Online Right you might notice there is a major exception to this. An instance in which you get immediate pushback, immediate insistence that no one is listening. Immediate insistence that no one respects your opinion. Immediate insistence that no one cares…

Even when your take or comment is poorly formed and you’d be otherwise inclined to conclude that no one was listening.

It doesn’t matter if you flare out at 100 impressions and zero likes, and no retweets… People will show up to comment anyway that “No one cares” or something to the effects, seemingly in violation of all laws of sociology, the algorithm, and convervation of attention and energy… If your comment at all touches on violence.

Mention violence AT ALL or hint towards kinetic action in some manner, and no matter how little engagement you were getting or how completely cold and silent the internet and algorithm were towards you that day… 3 characters will show up.

A Paranoiac will show up to accuse you of being a Fed or Glowie; a leftist or centrist will show up to tell you “You’ll do nothing”, “No one will do anything”, “Keep posting from your mom’s basement”; and some blackpiller will show-up to say something like “If only they would! But [the Jews/Society/Christianity/Comfort] has brainwashed too many. It’ll never happen. We have no choice but to sit back and watch the world die.”

And these are common enough sentiments or patterns of thought that you’d usually dismiss them as someone restating what others have said a million times…

Unless you already knew about The Paradox of Indifference, and had a large enough platform to have an intimate feel for how crowds and forums respond to tweets and posts, you almost certainly wouldn’t notice this… When you have a small account there’s a lot of noise to that signal.

When I was Smaller account I’d repost the exact same twitter threads (which looking back some were really slop-grade) and it’d be really random, some would die immediately and get no engagement, and then other times the exact same thread (being reposted! After your giga-fans have already seen it) would go to 6 million impressions just off randomness… When you have only a few hundred or 1000 followers, it’s just way more random what does and doesn’t get engagement… Whether or not a “larger account” of 5k followers, retweets or doesn’t has a way bigger effect… It’s way harder to notice trends or objective quality when your small and depending on that first 20 impressions.

.

But now that I’m a larger account It’s really easy to see what is and isn’t organic or what does and doesn’t match the dataset of what you’ve seen before… And basically none of the Glowie Demoralization strikes me as organic.

It’s way too consistent on things that should not generate a response. Again, I have A LOT of bad takes. For all the good Tweets that go out that I assume a lot of my followers see and like, there’s a LOT of ill conceived garbage that gets no response from anyone, that I quickly realize is ill conceived and delete… AND YET consistently, anything that touches on violence… No matter how little reach it generates, or how little engagement it gets, always… Always… ALWAYS. Somehow generates a “glowie”, a “you won’t do shit”, and a blackpiller.

Indeed I’m not the only one who’s noticed this…. The obscure Hacker known as 4chan has philosophized about this phenomenon on and off for the past decade or so.

Indeed i wish i could find the original (link if you have it, I’ll edit it in and sing your praises) but there was even a famous post from a self-declared actual glowie “DeRadicalization Expert” who was a regular racist 4channer in his free time.

In the post he said that basically the entire De-Radicalization sphere was run by women, boomers, and foreigners (this is where the feds stuff their Nepo-babies and DEI hires while white guys do important things)… And most all of them have zero sense of humor or real counter-cultural awareness. Allegedly it takes them forever to interpret the most basic memes and jokes… And every single attempt at actually manipulating the young online right has basically failed. This probably won’t shock you, but directing or manipulating the online right, and especially the Far-Right is basically like herding cats. Even with the strongest bot-ing efforts and possibly millions in expenditures… they’ve never gotten really anything to take off or manipulate the online right. (With the probable exception of QAnon, which was someone claiming to be a Federal agent and really only boomers and non-internet natives fell for).

However there was one exception this self-declared glowie identified… The glowies realized they could make the online right fight each-other, by themselves accusing people of being Feds and Glowies.

That the only thing they could consistently do is make the unherdable cats act ever more like unherdable cats…

Which in itself is devastating enough.

.

Effective Political Movements Use Violent Rhetoric

The Charlie Kirk Shooting celebrations were amazing anthropological studies.

“Ah Yes. Heer ve may zee zee scweeching vwite vwoman in herr natural habitat of zee social media … Prwactacing her twraditional mating cwall, Of rwevelling in zee blood of a swlain apex male. She twies to wure her desirwed wvarlike mate awvay from zee “boy-pussy” vwich has “trwans”-fixed him (pardon ze pun), sadly howevwer she vill not succeed… due to zee polution from zee Xenoestrogens, und zee SSRIs, und zee disturbances of zee “Feds”, ze twaditional vwite mating rituals have become more und more stwained and perwilwous ewery year. Her wvomb is weft barwen und her fwustrated arouwal wvasted on zee “Litewary ewotica” und zee ever more ewaborate pwastic monstwocities.”

I am convinced that a significant percentage… Likely a MAJORITY of all the “Glowie”, “You won’t do shit”, “We can’t do anything” posting… is actually the result of federal bot farms and internal Manipulation systems run by Twitter and other forums.

Despite how paranoid, self-sabotaging, defeatist, and preeningly morally-faggotous the average “CoNsErVaTiVe” is… I am convinced that mere stupidity, cowardice, and self-righteous uselessness really does not explain the phenomenon of “Glownigger Demoralization”. It simply does not match the pattern of any other posting… It’s too consistent a response on too buried and irrelevant posts.

And for any of you who doubt how self-defeating and damaging this reflexive response to violent rhetoric, or mere hypothetical speculation more often, truly is… Let us briefly digress through the example of movements that ARE effective in modern politics.

.

Whenever I want to see what an apex hyper-effective political movement would do, I look at 4-5 examples of truly S-Tier modern political movements that have out-competed others in “Republics” and international politics… At-least in terms of their effectiveness in gaining and maintaining political power, these are the greatest there have ever been.

By our powers combined we become… The Twentieth Century.

These 4-5 are:

1. OG German National Socialism of the 20s and 30s
2. 20th Century Communism
3. Zionism
4. New Left Woke-Progressivism
5. Neo-Conservatism

Now some of my more “pilled” readers (we can debate the nature and color) might argue that I named the Nazis, then Judeo-Bolshevism and then just repeated myself 3 more times… Some real old-school conservative 90s conspiracy cope-maxxers might argue I repeated myself 5 times… but that is neither here nor there.

These are the apex players… The top of their game. The Big Five of modern political ideologies, and if they’re doing something you’re not, you’re just asking to lose.

So how do these 5 ideologies respond to the Question of violent rhetoric? They all have the same answer. Every one of them encourages it without limit.

All 5 of them allow their followers limitless violent ideation and expression, as long as it is pulling in the right direction.

No Neo-Con ever told a Rush Limbaugh or Bill O’Reilly type to “Shut the Fuck up” about wanting to nuke Mecca in retaliation for 9/11, or just kill them all and take the oil, or cool it about wanting to punch their fellow Americans in the face. Even if he might have thought it, actual war-vetran and POW John McCain never ONCE told Hillary Clinton (who only ever served the Commander and Chief in bed (and not well)) that she had “no idea what the fuck she was talking about” and to leave it to Men who had seen combat, nor did he ever impersonate Jack Nicholson in A Few Good Men to call Lindsay Graham a Lawyer in a Uniform, and a pussy who had never deployed and had to shut the fuck up about combat and war… Neo-Cons don’t undermine the most shameless ChickenHawks on their own side.

As long as you’re advocatiog more war you can yell whatever you want on TV. You can openly express your wish to see warcrimes committed or your desire to personally punch named individuals in the face.

Likewise, Woke-Progressives NEVER go after their own obese armchair guerillas shouting “Punch Nazis” or “Resist ICE” nor do they go after the 70 year old white, black, and jewish activists posting “Kill All Whites”… They don’t tell sickly 16 year old mixed race girls and 60 year old black women to "Shut the hell up" about Punching Nazis or shooting Trump or ICE Agents since they’re weaklings who never could… They don’t post that the "eliminate Whiteness" 78 year old Jewish professor glows and that no one should listen to her, and she’s going to get black men in trouble if they follow her advice and actually go after whitey. ANTIFA and the Gay Race Communists don’t undermine the people promoting violence on their side.

No IDF member in history, as far as I can tell, has ever posted beneath a 50 year old Upstate New York Zionist lady and told her to shut her damned mouth about Gaza, that she has no idea what real war is like, and she is completely unqualified to talk on the matter… On the contrary the IDF and former IDF members often retweet or promote shameless American Zionist activists who’ve never seen combat, and don’t even pretend that they ever have or would see combat themselves. Zionists don’t undermine Zionists calling for Zionist violence. They don’t even tell US politicians to step the breaks on calling for Nuking cities defended only by insurgents with small arms.

No communist admonishes another communist that they’ll “Get people in trouble” for calling for violence. And the last Communist to ever call another communist a coward and keyboard (quill?) warrior were some early socialists who bitched and complained the Marx had taken such prominence inspite of not fighting in the Revolution of 1848. After that not a single Communist ever publicly told eachother to shut up about violent revolution. Che Guevera, an actual violent revolutionary, lived long enough to see his image become a symbol of student revolution in the US in the 60s… He NEVER called the American student movement posers and pussies for endorsing revolution none of them were actually shooting over.

Likewise the Nazis NEVER implied any of the fat, aged, or female of their movement were to have no opinions on the violence and street-fighting necessary to advance their movement… Only that they were to have the correct opinion… Which is that they wish they could smash them all.

.

Effective movements do not undercut their own supporters endorsing violence to advance it. They encourage this, because it gives moral support and cover to their actual fighters, and establishes an extreme bargaining position for any “Mostly-Peaceful” negotiations they might want to enact.

Even if the 90 year old Grandma saying “Revolution Now! Punch Nazis!” has not punched a soul in her life and never will, and knows not even how to form a fist properly, ANTIFA LIKES having aging old women endorsing their violence because it helps normalize them and create cultural and moral cache, and Democrats like having a violent vanguard to intimidate their enemies and give them negotiating power and a backstop to any of their policies being undone. No Democrat politician is going to denounce ANTIFA, and if they’re cornered they’ll do so in the most mealy mouthed manner and only that one time and equivocating as they do it… And absolutely NO ANTIFA activist is going to attack the 90 year old lady telling her she’s never done anything and knows nothing about violence and won’t do shit and needs to shut the fuvk up because she glows and is going to get someone in trouble.

.

Violent Rhetoric Works

And even more violent rhetoric works even better.

Or to quote Tucker:

For this reason I was already 90% convinced all the “Glowie”, “You haven’t done anything”, “you won’t do shit”, “No one will do anything”, “You know nothing about fighting”, “no one cares” posting was a demoralization PsyOp… And as soon as I noticed these posts consistently violated the Conservation of Indifference… I knew it had to be the case.

Screeching Women Work

I was as shocked as anyone to find out the Meme Unit from “Rome: Total War” is basically accurate to history, and attested in multiple primary sources and histories across hundreds of years… If anything Rome: Total War downplays it…

The Braying for Blood of otherwise non-violent people is VITALLY important to effective political movements. Indeed its shocking effect has been known since ancient times.

Germanic and Celtic armies would load up their women and children with them when they practiced their migratory warfare and these would form rear blocker units in the line of the battles that followed…

Women and girls would shout invectives calling their men cowards and effeminate, that if the men lost they’d rather die than be enslaved, and mothers would shout, brandishing the knife, that they’d rather gut their babies then and there in their arms than let them be captured… and young girls would stand with spears vowing to skewer any man that ran that they were more man than any that broke… And on more than one occasion (Notably Vercellea) their army did break and they followed through on their threats: Teenage girls running their fathers, brothers, and betrothed through with spears… And mothers bashing their babies brains out with axes.

“The Women of the Teutones Defend the Wagon Fort” (1882) by Heinrich Leutemann

On most occasions however, this was highly effective, and basically all English, Germanics, Scandinavians, and some Slavs, are descended from people who practices similar things.

The violent blood curdling undulations of women are very good motivators. You fight that much harder when your teenaged crush is watching, your wife is threatening to disembowel you child and herself, and your mother is threatening to disembowel you if you turn around.

But the profound military and cultural force of womanly braying for blood certainly did not stop with the Ancient Germanics or the British Boadicea. Whether Joan D’Arc in the Hundred Years War, female fanaticism for Abolitionism in the lead up to the US Civil War, or the White Feather Movement in WW1, or the women in the new left and student riots and terrorist movements of the 60s and 70s… The Bloodlust and fanatical screeching of girls, women, and “men” who would never fight in a million years is consistently a necessary part of any political built up to either violence or the credible threat of violence, from which negotiation can occur. Ukraine famously had countless cringe and some dignified, moments of Ukrainian women braying for blood making war promo videos, and vowing to fight to the death (something at-least a few thousand of the women actually did)… And in spite of the Chud instinct to autistically (and understandably in the modern west) denounce such women as whores and regime shills for demanding and manipulating unequal sacrifices from men whilst demanding equal or greater privileges elsewhere…

The simple fact remains that this is EFFECTIVE.

Political movements are empowered and supercharged by the Bloodlust of people who have never and never expect to fight, or would only do so in the most dire extremity.

Their cries for blood and cheers for violence matter… because they are basically PRECOMMITTING to give status, standing, moral license, and sexual access to the men who MIGHT decide to commit violence.

We can see this from the left with the Case of Luigi Mangione. Where hundreds of thousands, if not millions of leftist women, have made it clear through their public statements and actions that any leftist assassins will be treated as rockstar sex symbols.

Read my piec on the Mangione Case here:

Getting Away With It: The Art of Urban Infiltration and Exfiltration. Or the Tragedy of Luigi Mangione

This has an incredible effect on political life beyond any immediate violence. It means that Politicians, judges, police, lawyers, media… All of them, act hesitatingly towards violating leftist sacred cows, even if they say they won’t, in the exact same manner that politicians throughout the Commonwealth and Europe baby Islam for fear of the credible violent threat behind any Islamic claim of offense.

.

By contrast look at how the Right Wing relates to violence. Unlike Nazis, Communists, Zionists, Progs, and Neo-Cons… The American right DOES NOT encourage violence where it can, hold its tongue where it can’t, and say the exact bare minimum denouncing violence with mouthed words and equivocations of “both sides” in the rarest of instances where a gun is held to their head and they’re forced to denounce….

Instead RW politicians, influencers, and even ordinary poster run and jump to denounce violence from their own side as fast, frequently, aggressively, and uniquely as humanly possible.

Nick Fuentes responded to the Charlie Kirk assassination by denouncing HIS OWN FOLLOWERS if they even THOUGHT about violence as a response… This was before he even had denounced the left for killing Kirk.

This is why the Right has no negotiating power… Because there isn’t even a threat they’ll even think about doing anything. Indeed that Fuentes said so probably the best argument the Fed accusations are true.

By contrast a leftist in such a position would focus EXCLUSIVELY on Right Wing violence, and even play footsie with whatever violent rhetoric or commie euphemisms they could get away with…. Or even push it til they were forced to “Clarify” that “Direct Action” and “ Revolutionary Contest” simply meant “Peaceful Protest” and “Political Organizing”../

All protest, all political action, all Democracy is simply simulated tribal warfare… And it only works to the extent it acts as a proxy for the actual will and spirit to have such warfare. “Peaceful protests” achieve nothing without the credible implicit (or explicit) threat of them turning violent. Ask doctor King.

How devastating is it then when exactly ONE half of the political equation and exactly one ethnicity is effectively policed and persuaded that the violent rhetoric which creates that will and spirit is itself illegitimate?

I Hear endlessly and endlessly:

“There’s no chance whites will do anything, Right Wingers don’t do anything! It doesn’t matter, they lack the will and spirit.”

Really?!

You think Fuentes had to go on his show and denounce his own audience after Kirk because there was No Chance of a real response to the Kirk assassination?

You think Kier Starmer is arresting 30 Britons a day for “Hate Speech” and “incitement”, and giving them 2+ year sentences over Facebook posts… because there’s NO CHANCE of it turning into real action? The British state is just expending Hundreds of thousands of dollars and weeks of magistrates time to combat random citizens heated two minute posts… Because they feel like it?

You think the British state was fighting to get Minders in pubs listening to men’s idle conversation…. because they’re Randal from Recess and they just really like snooping?

No. They’re Afraid.

Western Governments sure think baseline chatter is at high risk of tipping over into actual violent revolution…. And indeed we have a control test that proves they’re right.

The Revolution Machine

Twitter was only five years old when it killed its first governments, and it’d killed its first million people before age 10. This is eons ago in internet time, but in 2011 Twitter was almost entirely GENUINELY a Free Speech platform, Jack Dorsey himself was running around calling himself and Twitter “the Free Speech wing of the Free Speech party”. the Feds hadn’t even really wised up to the relevance of social media…

Then the Arab spring took off overthrowing or starting civil wars in Tunisia, Lybia, Egypt, Syria, and spreading to Irag… And abortive protests in about a dozen other countries.

A lot of commentators like to confuse the initial protests with the subsequent US Saudi and Israeli interferences and interventions… but to be frank, call me naive, I’ve quite convinced the original protest movements and revolutions were organic and actually just spread on social media… Because I cannot imagine ANY intelligence agency or even series of intelligence agencies being hubristic enough, recklessness enough, and getting approval to overthrow a half dozen governments at once! Not the least because 2011 simply wasn’t a high risk or particularly active moment in Geopolitics that any were desperate or impatient enough to try something so insane.

Put simply I’m 80-90% sure that the initial Arab Spring (not unlike the fall of the Berlin Wall and Warsaw Pact) was a genuine mass outpouring of protests and public rage across the Middle-East that subsequently got US support. And if you’re skeptical, we know that these mass multi-country cultural events happen because there was no CIA, MI6, Mossad, or KGB to make the revolutions of 1848 happen.

And at the center was Social Media. 9 out of 10 protestors said that they used Facebook and Twitter to organize their protests and actions, indeed after the election of Barack Obama, this was probably the most immediate demonstration of the sudden importance of social media to international politics…

And at least at the time (as far as I can tell) Social Media was genuinely basically uncensored and algorithmically unsuppressed… Indeed Progressive-Liberal triumphalism probably stopped the most immediate conclusion from percolating into pop-culture… because ObViOuSlY free speech is only a threat to “Authoritarian” backwards countries… Then Intel Agencies freaked out completely when Trump won at social media hard enough to become President of the US, and they learnt that Social Media will overthrow their fake and gay propaganda regimes just as easily as they can overthrow the government of Tunisia.

.

The exact same effect that makes German screeching women, or New-Left easy hippy chick protesters highly effective at rallying and herding people for political demonstrations and violence, makes Social Media probably the most effective weapon ever devised for overthrowing political regimes and governments.

This is why censorship, bot-ing, algorithmic suppression, and outright arrests have been ratcheted up to unimaginable levels around the west… and why Tiktok was forced into sale by the US government.

Kier Starmer knows that if Britons were allowed to say what they really think of his regime he’d probably be sodomized to death with a hot piece of rebar just like Qaddafi.

Imagine the thread if Britons were allowed to speak freely?

[Some British girl is raped to death by migrant gangs]

OP: Fuck this country. Fuck these people. People should just start killing them and politicians for sport. We should give out Knighthoods, Titles, and Crowns according to whoever kills the most.
>Reply 1: That’d be so based.
>Reply 2: That’s basically how British history worked.
>Reply 3: I’m an old man, and a pussy, but I’d buy drinks for life for anyone who did it.
>Reply 4: I’d name my kid for anyone who did. Due in October.
>Reply 5: Congratulations! Hope its a boy. “Steve the StarmerSlayer” would be a weird Name for a girl.
>Reply 6: I’d marry my daughter to Steve.
>Reply 7: (Replying to 4) That’s so sweet. I envy your wife. I’ve yet to find my Steve.
>Reply 8: Screw my Libtard kids. I’d leave my estate to build statues of Steve.
>Reply 9: I’d leave my estate to Steve.
>Reply 10: I’d blow Steve every day.
>Reply 11: Shut your mouth slut! Have some dignity around Steve.
>Reply 12: Hail the once and Future Steve!
>Reply 13: I’d die for Steve.
>Reply 14: If it took 30 years of misery I’d still fight for Steve.
>Reply 15: Pour one out for Steve.
>Reply 16: What an amazing guy.
>Reply 17: I hope he kills them all.

.

Of course such discourse naturally progresses until some man or men listening concludes that maybe they could be Steve and in fact they’d rather like to be.

This is the natural organic progression of politically aligned, mono-ethnic, open political/moral conversation. Political language and moral language in general is evolved to organize violence, create violent hierarchies, and communicate loyalty within them. Or did you think your complex moral logic and rhetorical skills evolved to turn you into a hesitating self-doubting pussy? Why would that be adaptive?

The natural progress of any moral-political conversation amongst healthy intelligent like-minded people of the same ethnicity is to organize a coalitional conspiracy to commit ultra-violence against their ethnic, sexual, and political enemies. Look at Communists, Fascists, Zionists, the American Founders, the Jacobins, The Black Power Movement, Football Clubs, the Rationalist Community, or the Peace Movement.

The “Yes and…” dynamic of agreeable discussion, improv, and "LARPing" has a natural logical conclusion… and that conclusion is IRL slaughter.

This is the purpose of moral language. The only time it doesn’t happen is frontier societies where even processing the resources they already have is challenge enough, or in the immediate aftermath of violent conflagrations, in which the gender ratios, economic realities, and age demographics are if anything even more conducive to peace than in the Virgin territory of the frontier (no matter how plentiful the fish, game or resources, there aren’t a surplus of women on virgin territory (despite the name)).

Thus where-ever you see organization for violence NOT happening. Spontaneous coalitions NOT forming. Wishes for a violent warlord to unite them NOT being expressed. Eyeing of rivaled ethnicities as people to be driven out, conquered, slain, or enslaved NOT being done.

You can rest assured something profoundly artificial is preventing that from happening.

And NO not even the traitorous spiritual poisoning and child abuse carried out by Priests, School-Teachers, and Television, is sufficient to explain it.

Again Starmer wants to legally force British pubs to ban patrons who partake in political banter and have inspections to prevent ordinary conversation. Western Governments with access to intel agencies and analysts are so convinced that mere banter could snowball into ethnic conflict or regime overthrow.

So why does this not happen on the online right via social media and seemingly quite free forums when we can plainly see Antifa and Trans activists regularly talk each-other into violence that they have seemingly no capacity or hormonal temperament to effectively carry out?

.

Because the government has MILLIONS of bots all telling right wingers they’re “Glowies”, “you won’t do shit”, “no one will do anything”, “Resistance is impossible they have AI”, “People are too comfortable”, “Nothing ever happens”, “You’re going to get people in trouble”, “No that would play into their hands! Don’t you see? They want us divided!”, “No one cares”

Why would anyone feel compelled to express such canned sentiments for the 10th time? Why would they feel compelled to express these sentiments ENTIRELY out trend with all engagement metrics, and all indifference curves, and all trendlines and know rules of what makes people engage?

Because they’re government bots that exist to suck oxygen out of any organic right wing political movements capable of exercising real resistance, or real negotiating power.

They are a retardant being sprayed across American and European social media endlessly… And whenever a US administration wants to exercise pressure on a client state, or Iran, or any other country… They can just turn off bots or turn them down, or tell them to start braying for blood and calling for the death of the Ayatollah, and 2011 style social crowd dynamics follow suite.

The “Public Will” is a collection of bots largely hard coded in US Social Media Companies. This is why notoriously Free speaking, highly armed, fanatical, and disagreeable Americans are somehow the people who resist Globohomo the least… Because NSA “Anti-extremism” experts are really sensitive to any American resistance to their government… But things like Irish Anti-migrant sentiment or Canadian Truckers fed up with lockdowns and hateful of Trudeau are really outside their attention and they have to play catch-up. After they get into the news.

The Warlike Animal

A Germanic assembly [thing[, by Charles Rochussen (1814-1894)

All warfare is based.
-Sun Tzu

This may be hard for most people to comprehend, but people are really violence machines… crowds of people especially. From the Assembly of Athens, to mobs of Ancient Rome, and the Ancient Germanic “Things” or “AllThings” (General political meetings of freemen), to the crowds, riots and protests of the late medieval and early modern period… It’s really hard to get any crowd of ethnically homogeneous people together in any political setting without them more or less rationally concluding that they should coordinate aggressive complex violence against their enemies right then and there. Part of the reason Public executions were stopped in the 19th and early 20th century is because the crowds were getting too large, and the immediate mood of righteously killing someone in front of a group that might call for another person to be killed was too concerning.

Moral language, reason, and oratory more or less evolved to coordinate violence at the group level of a tribe or crowd… and you can see how much extraordinary effort actually goes into mainstream politics at political rallies and other events to keep things boring and keep more ancient crowd dynamics from forming. This is actually the thing that distinguished Trump, not any especially remarkable oratical skill… But rather that he’d just say the obvious high energy things that would make a political group want to fight and unlock the ancient excitement and power of crowds “Lock her up”, “Build the wall”, “Drain the swamp”… “This whole system’s rigged”… All things that flirt with the more ancient and obvious rhetorical and crowd dynamics that end with coordinated group violence against their enemies.

.

And the most effective rally-er of that group cohesion, and the most immediate marker of where the status is to be gained for the people who might commit violence or might dedicate months of their lives to organizing, herding, threatening, aproaching violence, and then negotiating successfully (just like the founding heroes of every nation in history)…. Is the public expression of rage and desire… The braying for blood, The cry of Havoc.

Especially of women.

At least in the European male imagination, the heroic instinct to organize effectively, form a coalition, stand up to enemies for what he believes in, and fight if need be…

He experiences that mentally as an altruistic desire to help people, his people… And also if he gets rich and gets a hot wife and mistress out of it… that’ll be his just reward, but he’ll let that work itself out with time (it be gauche and mercenary to talk about it upfront)…

The reciprocal preforming of daring heroic deeds and the rewards of it are both expressed as altruistic generosity… The hero charges into danger even when no reward is promised, and the people he aids shower praise and rewards on him even when no payment is demanded… and the fact that there is no agreement, and either could have reneged or stiffed the other but didn’t, becomes the basis of High Trust community formation in the wake of their victory.

You’ve seen this story play out in fiction, and game design 1000 times… you’ve seen sly Hollywood propaganda slipped into it hundreds of times. But this is the organize violence/community formation/mating reward loop of western man… Heed the cry for help, do heroic deeds expecting no reward, and reap over-joyous rewards and choice marriages from the genuinely high trust good people who are worthy of your long term alliance.

How easy is it then to Poison this loop and lock western man out of his violence… by simply fucking with the cry for help?

Stop Lancelot! Don’t! She’s a Glowie! (Sir Frank Dicksee 1853-1928 “Chivalry”)

If for every “Won’t somebody do something” or “Save us” or “We should fight these people”… You get a “Glowie”, a “They want us divided”, a “but what about the optics”, a “Nobody will do shit they’re too comfortable and don’t want to”, a “But the AI Tracking!?”, a “Trust the Plan”, a “No that’s what they want you to do”, a “Shut up woman, you know nothing about politics and war”, a Nick Fuentes saying “If any of you take up arms: I disavow you. I disown you.”, a “No one cares”.

You destroy the feedback loop.

Like bucks who, when the doe has lead them together for their battle, are broken up and prevented from fighting by some insane peacenik old lady, or birds interrupted mid mating dance by the sounds and lights of a recently constructed theme park… The necessary adaptive socio-sexual feedback loop that tell apex violent western men when and how and for what causes to fight and how to gain sexual access by doing so… All those signals are being fucked with and blocked, intentionally…and this is the core source of rot in our civilization.

The necessary orgy of blood, and young white people mating, and the violent restructuring of western society into something non-suicidal cannot occur until we can find some effective means to silence the false signals, route around the damage, and get the rites of spring going again.

To Cry Havoc and Bray for Blood, in a manner that will be heard.

Ah Yes. Und now vee may zee zee apex vestern vwhite male.
Vwhile zee goyslop ‘as poisoned many of ‘is kind into un hermaphroditical soy induced “Guay”, “Wreddit”, or Obese “Fatso” sexual non-viability… zis one, vith ‘is superior 6'1'' height, und 5" genitalia, und bmi of 28, stands… not metaphorically… head und shoulders above zee “males” of zee other species whom his traitorous governmants und elderly have imported in a fit of zee narcicism und zee misaplied parenting principle… not un-lyke zee Cookoo Bird.

Zis vwarlike buck, zough flabbier und more sedentary zan zee great vwhite vwarriors of old, still demonstrates his vwarlike instincts und ambitions… However zees are vwasted on zee video game und zee historical media debate forum… his natural strategic brillience unseen, his vwarlike insincts und desires… like his sexual appetites, are Fwustrated.

Wreaching into his noble natuer, he breaks zee spell und turns to zee politics und zee“Wreal wvorld” only for un confusing caucophony of artifi’cial cries to greet him… Some-vwhere in zee artifi’cial lights und sounds his natur-ral comrades cry “Join us bwother, vee have great fwighting to do” und elsewhere zee female doe makes her screech “Fwight for me oh wvarrior! Zuch disgusting zuitor I cannot staaond. Zlay zee old ones, und zee brown ones! Zhey are 5’3”!? Szave me! Szave me!”

Alas, ze cannot hear. For everyvwhere is zee deafening caucophony “Glowie”, “But ze optics”, “Trust ze plan”, “You won’ do Shiite”, “Zey want us divided”, “Zee AI zis twacking you”, “Violance zis neva zee answar”, “zee voices zat cry for help, zey arre ze Feds”, “Zey are twying to provoke you”, “toucha zee grass”.

His bewovwed cwies for him, cwies zat he must fight… but ze does no hear.

ZHis nobler eldars, zey cwies that zhis zis not vwat zhey fought for… Zhat zhe must fight und slay zees 5'3" brown monstrosities beseting zher granddaughters… But zhe does no hear… Zhee cwies of zee “wracist” und “zee optics”, und “No one cares”… Zhey make him to hessistate.

On Zhis fwustrated face you may zee zee torn instincts und fwustration. Zee instinct for zee violence vwhich ist zee meaning of his being zis torn by zee false cwies of zee “Fed-bot” und zee Ju-bird, und ze “Con-Inc. Cuck”, zhey have thowoughly confused him. Zhus Zhe commits no violence.

Zhe is frustrated. Zis pained face zhow zhat his mood is blue, zee downcast look zhow that his ball are blue…z he passes un woman on zee street, who might ‘ave been his bewovwed… her hair is blue.

Without a mate, she has taken to zee despewate extwemity of twying to mate vith another doe… Zat zis ist zee least awful zuitor hast found zher. Zis Blue Zee Warmest Color?
Mes non! But it ist ze warmest zees does have found. Zee fwigid dying wesbian bed, vwivh atwacts no buck.

Zhis Fvate ist und lesson for us all. Zis is vhat occurs vhen ve forget ze simple twuth:

Ze Violence zis alvvays ze anzwer.

Tip:

BITCOIN: bc1qdhj7637sgcssxgxygjaa3ddljwy8tzg5mzw325

MONERO: 8AhA3g9hbtDcAJE5MPmeQsFwwGsf3H9fq9tC6giQ4a6vKnTXv4J4MivKXrPKDpXyEeNc9mfFejbq84kSWkC8pjuj18rAEij

---

Follow me on Twitter: @FromKulak