There is no point arguing this with him. It's clear he has emotional reasons that underpin his hatred of Christianity and his love of paganism. And he will rationalize ad nauseam to maintain that framework.
My advice is to patiently wait for his writings on contemporary events. Those are worth reading, unlike his articles on religion.
That’s right coward. Keep backing down. Keep retreating. Flee into the hinterlands, never fight back. Never engage with the world. You’re going to heaven anyway, none of this matters. God will put it right. We all return to the dust from whence we came. You’ll transcend soon.
This 'put up or shut up' argument with 'based Christians' *always* works. Either they start whining about how it's 'too high a bar' or they claim that 'no one else is doing better' or some other evasion.
In the end, these 'based Christians' want to proselytize among 'the right' because *absolutely no one will listen to them* within their own religious communities.
Yes. As long as it is about comparison of power or popularity, on any other crypto leftist terms, Christianity will be in bad shape. Our only hope is to put the question in terms of what is true
Man you’re literally incapable of conversing with anybody else, aren’t you? Just an absolute refusal to engage with the world on the terms that actually exist. You are the same as conservatives. Die with honour than win with bloody knuckles.
'Truth is a whore to whoever has power. Christianity has proven this time and again. As long a 'Christianity' had power it could dictate 'truth'. Now that 'Christianity' can no longer control 'truth' it ceases to serve 'Christianity'.
But all that matters to me is 'Christianity' is anti-White (because it's not pro-White).
Socrates was the sophist. Protagoras was a man of substance and accomplishment who assisted in the creation of two constitutions for two Greek colonies. He was also respected as a healer.
“Do not think that I have come to bring peace to the earth; I have not come to bring peace, but a sword. For I have come to set a man against his father, and a daughter against her mother, and a daughter-in-law against her mother-in-law; and one’s foes will be members of one’s own household” (Matthew 10:34-36).
And what does that mean? That 'Jesus' really doesn't believe in 'love they neighbor'? Or perhaps 'the Bible' is just a hodgepodge of contradictory Bronze Age desert-hermit gibberish in which you can find justification for killing 'pagans' while at the same time find justification for welcoming brown military-aged-male 'immigrants'.
No, these words are a prophecy, and a very accurate one. Look how much blood was shed first over persecution of Christians by pagans, nd then, by Christian- on Christian warfare. He did indeed “bring the sword”.
Pagan Rome persecuted Christians, before it got smart and decided to ride the wave of the future. But I agree, it was minor compared to what Christians have done to each other (and to Jews.)
Pagan Rome 'persecuted' Christians because Christians were (rightly) perceived as a corrosive force elevating jews to positions of authority within the Roman world. As for what 'Christians' have 'done' to jews, what I see is that 'Christians' gave jews safe harbors in the West when they would not have had such without the *protection* of 'Christendom'. It was, in general, *the people* who rose up against jews and *the churches and nobility* who protected the jews over the people.
Jews lied about being persecuted just as they always do. Then the moment they got into power they began doing everything they imagined and more to the Europeans.
Anyone who refused to kneel to jewish rule, sorry "ride the wave of the future" was brutally suppressed.
Yes. A perfect example of the mixed messaging in the new testament. The apostles are supposed to sell their cloaks for swords but Peter was wrong to use his. Blessed are the peacemakers but Yeshua has not come to bring peace.
The entire thing is a mishmash of conflicting stories and philosophies. Either he had multiple personality disorder or at least some of the stories are fiction.
They are the same Jesus. The difference is that the peaceful Jesus messaging is needed on a personal level (for most people, most of the time), and the aggressive Jesus messaging is needed on a societal level. We've been at peace so long that the peaceful messaging has taken over almost completely, but that does not mean they are different messaging. Yin and Yang are two parts of the same whole.
A few centuries ago Big Science and Big Religion teamed up to try and destroy magic, which is why mainstream Western Civilization is now a spiritual desert and reaching for the revolver of Communism to end it's own misery.
We've come to the end of the enlightenment, and it turns out reality is way bigger that we could ever possibly hope to comprehend. Instead of admitting defeat we doubled down on rationalist materialism, tried to make the world fit our preconceived notions using technocratic totalitarianism, and drove ourselves insane.
Based Christian here. Great article and no offense taken. I have the same frustrations. Aside from online communities I have never met another based Christian IRL. And converting the feminized, chubby remnants of a once great faith is a fools errand. The men are long gone and are not coming back.
I find it very difficult to believe that the God of the universe wants me in a suicide pact, holding hands as the church building burns. Celebrating our abuse as evidence of our piety. Unwilling to identify our enemies and impose our will on anyone.
Something has definitely gone terribly wrong in the last hundred years or so and I long for the days when my White ancestors praised God for the sounds of guns, burned witches, castrated sodomites, and genocided baby-raping cannibal villages in mesoamerica. Those guys read the same Bible we do yet held few illusions as to their purpose on this earth.
When the Levitical World-Masters want their golems to conquer a continent for them, they dial up the "kill-the-Midianites" signal using Chringianity as their medium.
When their golems have served that purpose, and the continent is cleared and cultivated, the Levitical cult dials up the "meek-shall-inherit" signal, through the exact same medium.
That's the true purpose of the "mixed signals" in the Great Grimoire.....
"In other words, Christians can use force when it is called for [by their Jewish masters], and than maintain peace once force has done its job [for the Jewish masters]."
I’ve written about this many times. The New Testament is life-denying, comfort-denying, strength-denying, fertility-denying. Earthly life is something to be despised, cast away. It’s so different from the Okd Testament that the phrase “Judaeo-Christian” is oxymoronic.
In no way is it strength denying or fertility denying. The vast majority of Christians are intended by God to have many children. The glory of young men are their strength and physical training is of value.
Welp, although Jesus went on about the sacred bond of marriage, He said nothing about reproduction. In fact, “blessed are the wombs that are barren,,the teats that never gave suck”. Yes I know that was a prophecy about the coming civil war, but it appears Jesus and the disciples thought they were living in the Last Days. Indeed you wouldn’t want to bear a child just in time for the great Tribulation.
We are living in a time period known as the Last Days and its true we dont know the time Christ will return. But as it says in 1 Tim 2: “Women will be saved through childbirth and continuing in the faith”. 1 Cor: “To the widows that are young, I encourage them to remarry and have children” These are not two different things. A woman who is continuing in the faith is one that will have children. A married woman not having children would be in disobedience to the order that God designed. Now this is often softened or not taught in todays church but it is clearly taught in the Bible.
I have noticed that among my friends and family its the Christians who are reproducing like rabbits while the non believers I know (who would be the ones who are mandated to reproduce) are darwinian dead ends.
I appreciate your pointing out those two comments. But St.Paul, even though he was writing earlier than the Gospel writers, was a practical guy who suggested many accommodations for which there doesn’t seem to be much support in Jesus’ words. For instance, his comments about temporal power, about which Jesus had nothing to say . And unlike Jesus, Paul’s comment about marriage (“Better to marry than to burn”) is the most tepid endorsement of wedded bliss ever.
I agree and I actually think that Paul is more marriage agnostic/less virile amongst the apostles. We know that Peter was married both before and after Jesus called him and sent him out. However this line of thinking that non-Christians tend to have misunderstands Christian doctrine.
1) The Bible has one author: God. Jehovah/God/the Great I AM is Father, Son, and Spirit.
2) He inspired (and even more than inspired but directly breathed) every word of the Bible. The prophets spoke many words in their life that were not God-breathed or infallible. But every word that God ordained to be recorded in the Bible as He divinely oversaw the compilation of the Bible was pure, perfect, and holy Truth, the literal Word of God.
3) Therefore the depth and multifacetedness of the Bible should never be mistaken as contradictions. Its God’s book for all people in all places for all time. The places and times might lead one to apply practical wisdom differently and from different parts of the Bible, while acknowledging the whole is Good and True just not every verse is equally applicable to your circumstance at that moment. God Himself also spiritually guides us through His Word and reveals application to us that stretches outside the exact scope of the text.
4) So Jesus wrote the Old Testament and the New. He speaks to us through every page. He enlightens our hearts and minds to understand the text, He alone unlocks it for the believer. The pattern of marriage and childbearing He gave at creation (the Creation Mandate) is in fact a command. He may personally convict some people over time to become monks or remain celibate, but the vast majority of people He intends to be fruitful and multiply. Read Jeremiah 29.
5) The most hardcore Christians have the most kids. The less fecund Christians on average are less committed (not all!). Clearly the devout Christians are doing so because they feel tasked by the Lord to do so. And they are correct. We are meant to live real lives with families, farms, and freedom. Not gay fake sterile consumerist cucked globohomo lives like the modern world is pushing on us.
Thank you for reading. Have a wonderful day, God bless, and may the right wing be victorious in our land
Jesus had neither wife nor child. In fact, since the claim is that he had no 'earthly' father and hus stepfather accepted the role of a cuckold, there's not much 'normal' about Jesus' family life at all.
The Bible is a hodgepodge of contradiction and self-congratulatory jewish fables that with ravings of death and violence that have inspired so many 'messiahs' down through time. Like Jim Jones and Charlie Manson
Oh great, another "Waahhh I'm mad at God!" screed. Your crisis of faith should be a personal matter between you and God. No need to childishly lash out at everyone else. Its embarrassing.
The majority of the church is non-White and leftist. You are outnumbered and pick fights with pagans instead of the faggots who took over the church. I spend way more time arguing against faggot Christians than supposedly based ones, because the based ones are rare.
Yes, they are all over Twitter, and they show up to most cultural events like Highland Games. They are pussies and easy to defeat in arguments because they are pussies. There is no denying that folkish pagans are outnumbered by universalist pagans - but on the other hand there are no universalist organizations that have hofs, do food drives, and get together every month in multiple states and countries to do moots. None of them have families in their organizations like the pagan group I am a member of. There is no universalist organization that exists off the internet, basically.
Same with the based Christians, its mostly an online thing. You guys have no churches that I know about, no based pastors leading their congregations against the great satan. Every church I can go to in my state is mixed race and liberalized. If you do know any based churches Eugene, please start sharing them far and wide so your brethren know and can support them. Do you know of any based churches?
I know that sounds facetious, but I am being serious. You guys should try to spread based Churches around so they can grow. This is what I do with my organization, I tell people about it so it can grow.
The Torah is based as all get out. Jesus endorsed Moses. What he deprecated was centuries of casuistry accumulated by the pharisees. Ron Paul is to Constitution was Jesus was to the Torah. (But Jesus has some other messages.)
In 30 AD, any armed resistance to the Roman Empire was doomed to fail unless you were the Persian Empire or Germans living in forests which gave Romans the willies. The way to overthrow pagan Rome was to create a shadow government which had better justice and a better welfare system that what the official state provided. See 1 Corinthians 5 and 6.
As for our current situation, it stems in large part from Christians outsourcing charity to governments and foundations. The solution to abortion and Obamacare is Church supported hospitals. These were once THE NORM. Notice how many hospitals (in the US at least) which have Christian names. Ditto for schools and universities.
Yes, Christians might need to draw the sword from time to time, but only AFTER doing the job of the church proves insufficient. (Any liberal preacher/priest who calls for government welfare needs to be reminded that government welfare is funded by the threat of violence. Calls for government welfare are not turning the other cheek, not by a long shot!)
This article is full of errors. I don't expect the author to engage reasonably, but hopefully this clears things up for other readers.
First of all is the fact that you are watching a nation in decline carrying with it mass apostasy from the gospel. "Secret based Jesus" is the Jesus believed in by most Americans prior to the 1900s. You can pick a theologian at random and find people saying most of the same things, now considered "based" but then considered normal and obvious. Judging religion by its apostates is obviously wrong. American Christianity faced institutional decline. This is nothing new as its basically the story of the Old Testament - revitalization of religion under good leadership followed by decades or centuries of decline.
Second of all is the fact that Christianity has different horizons of focus, but it is primarily preoccupied with the relationship between God and man, broken by man's lack of holiness. You can find information about politics, wise living, prosperity, etc. in the Bible and it is all true, but the focus is on righting the relationship with God. As such you get different social dynamics in church. Sure, there are "losers" in the church, but this is largely because the church doesn't exist to rally the most competent troops to engage in a social revolution but to address the holiness problem.
Third, the reason people want to convert you is because they don't want you to go to Hell. If you go to Hell, it is your own fault, we don't like that it happened, but it's not like this is a personal problem to us. If we waited to try to evangelize people until the church was in perfect order, it would just mean that many people didn't hear the gospel and went to Hell.
Fourth, the process of fixing the decline in the church requires us to do the same kind of work. To expose and demolish the communist interpretations of Jesus and to promote the true Jesus. Yes, it is hard to find great churches. Ok, well that is only going to change with better leaders and better members, which we do incrementally. If your church sucks, going to Hell sucks even more.
1. The church most of us grew up in was liberalized, and I have not found a single church with a based pastor. The majority of Christians in the world are non-White. The church is ruined and has to be rebuilt. None of the based Christians are doing it. Those of us who escaped will continue to protect ourselves from the rot that took over the church. Besides, the rot existed all the way in Christ's time. We abandoned our forefathers for Abraham, and we name our kids David. We were cucked a long time ago.
2. Many of us do not believe in original sin. We do not think man is broken - he functions as he should, with the will to power and the meekness of slaves. Natural law rules mankind, and we embrace the struggle of life, seeking arete and erdathe.
3. Hell is from the Germanic and Norse Hel, and its cold and not permanent. You mean the jewish Sheol or Gehanna.
4. Or, you can form your own kindred around your local community and focus on fixing things close to home, with your kindred. Why focus on a dying church that is mostly non-White at this point?
I'm pretty sure it was "there is no jew or greek" and "all are one under God" and "all humans come from Adam and Eve" type of rhetoric, brother. We were Christian when we started accepting kikes into our cities, and Christian when the liberal revolutionaries destroyed the monarchies. I don't recall either group arguing that man is perfect.
> I'm pretty sure it was "there is no jew or greek" and "all are one under God" and "all humans come from Adam and Eve" type of rhetoric, brother.
Those existed for nearly two millennia without leftist take over.
It was only after the belief that man is broken was abandoned that things when sideways.
The problem is that man *is* broken, even the pagans you seek to LARP as knew that. And that therefore one must seek to rise above one's brokenness, otherwise one will fall into the abyss on seeking to fulfill one's every impulsive desire. There's a reason leftists sought to tell kids that "you're perfect just the way you are".
Sorry to break it to you but you don't know that something that is true is false. God commands you to believe in Jesus because he is true, not as an act of the will.
If this God apparently bestowed upon humanity our intellect and rationality, why would that rationality go out the window when it comes to believing? Just commanding people to believe just because he said so? It basically just a big "trust me, bro".
> Maybe if you're in a dissident Mormon polygamist sect, ignore all the above, I'll accept that your group might not just be in a holding pattern waiting to be devoured by Jesus-Lennon Globohomo
ex-mormon here.... I dont see salvation here either
The mormon chruch taught that the "mark of caine" was black skin Im pretty sure they were race realists; the real issue is that at least 3 of them were pedophiles(pls do not attempt to start a religion law age of consent debate @ me)
True, they believed the complete nonsense that three races emerged from the flood via Shem, Ham (negroes), and Japeth, but that implies so much lack of understanding of human groups as to be, well, crazy, at this point.
As I like to point out, the super-ultra-esoteric-alchemical-hermetist-mystic-based-solar—Christianity is a minority of a minority. All of these guys act like priests. I call them Religion Guys. Their work, personality and presence is oriented around over-theoryceling on theology while not combining it with proselytism or organization. None of these people would ever think about starting their own denomination, or breaking away from the papacy and doing what SSPX did, and this is desperately needed for Protestants and Catholics.
More than half of the United States identifies as Christian, yet only 24% of those Christians attend church weekly — of those in weekly church attendance how many are apolitical, centre-right leaning neocon, Zionist and self sabotaging. How many are infected with the DEI heresy? These guys are alone, and they fabricate their legitimacy by grafting their views to the raw numbers of Christians and pretend to have consensus.
This is no different than reconstructionist pagans. They may follow the objectively truest version of Christianity, but it’s them who are the larpers attempting to piece together a broken tradition, while they accuse everyone else of the same.
As long as you think only in terms of what is useful, what will bring you and yours power or whatever it is that you want, you will still be no different than the moderns and the liberals. Also, no different than your real or imagined wotanist ancestor.
When you care only for what is true, when you stop looking for Based Jesus or Chad Jesus or whatever then you will find something that doesn't disappoint.
To fellow readers:
There is no point arguing this with him. It's clear he has emotional reasons that underpin his hatred of Christianity and his love of paganism. And he will rationalize ad nauseam to maintain that framework.
My advice is to patiently wait for his writings on contemporary events. Those are worth reading, unlike his articles on religion.
He makes a fine point tho.
That’s right coward. Keep backing down. Keep retreating. Flee into the hinterlands, never fight back. Never engage with the world. You’re going to heaven anyway, none of this matters. God will put it right. We all return to the dust from whence we came. You’ll transcend soon.
God will indeed put things right, and you will not like the punishment of your pride.
God waits for you at the pearly gates, you just have to retreat from the world even harder
Amen.
Concern trolling rejected.
"Double-Secret Super-Based Right Wing Jesus"
That would make one of the best names for a band EVER.
I think you'd have to rearrange it so that it makes a badass acronym.
Sortof like W.A.S.P. (We Are Sexual Perverts)
Nope. It’s a mouthful, but a mouthful worth saying.
I unironically enjoy DreamEvils song HMJ: Heavy Metal Jesus.
This 'put up or shut up' argument with 'based Christians' *always* works. Either they start whining about how it's 'too high a bar' or they claim that 'no one else is doing better' or some other evasion.
In the end, these 'based Christians' want to proselytize among 'the right' because *absolutely no one will listen to them* within their own religious communities.
Yes. As long as it is about comparison of power or popularity, on any other crypto leftist terms, Christianity will be in bad shape. Our only hope is to put the question in terms of what is true
Man you’re literally incapable of conversing with anybody else, aren’t you? Just an absolute refusal to engage with the world on the terms that actually exist. You are the same as conservatives. Die with honour than win with bloody knuckles.
'Truth is a whore to whoever has power. Christianity has proven this time and again. As long a 'Christianity' had power it could dictate 'truth'. Now that 'Christianity' can no longer control 'truth' it ceases to serve 'Christianity'.
But all that matters to me is 'Christianity' is anti-White (because it's not pro-White).
> Truth is a whore to whoever has power.
Ah, post-modernism.
Pre-Socratic.
If you mean Protagoras-style sophism, a.k.a., the philosophy that destroyed Athens, yes that's the same thing.
Socrates was the sophist. Protagoras was a man of substance and accomplishment who assisted in the creation of two constitutions for two Greek colonies. He was also respected as a healer.
“Do not think that I have come to bring peace to the earth; I have not come to bring peace, but a sword. For I have come to set a man against his father, and a daughter against her mother, and a daughter-in-law against her mother-in-law; and one’s foes will be members of one’s own household” (Matthew 10:34-36).
And what does that mean? That 'Jesus' really doesn't believe in 'love they neighbor'? Or perhaps 'the Bible' is just a hodgepodge of contradictory Bronze Age desert-hermit gibberish in which you can find justification for killing 'pagans' while at the same time find justification for welcoming brown military-aged-male 'immigrants'.
No, these words are a prophecy, and a very accurate one. Look how much blood was shed first over persecution of Christians by pagans, nd then, by Christian- on Christian warfare. He did indeed “bring the sword”.
The 'persecution' of 'christians' by 'pagans' is a 'christian' lie. 'Christians' were 'persecuted' by others 'christians' and jews.
Pagan Rome persecuted Christians, before it got smart and decided to ride the wave of the future. But I agree, it was minor compared to what Christians have done to each other (and to Jews.)
Pagan Rome 'persecuted' Christians because Christians were (rightly) perceived as a corrosive force elevating jews to positions of authority within the Roman world. As for what 'Christians' have 'done' to jews, what I see is that 'Christians' gave jews safe harbors in the West when they would not have had such without the *protection* of 'Christendom'. It was, in general, *the people* who rose up against jews and *the churches and nobility* who protected the jews over the people.
Precisely. If i could give you one hundred likes i would.
Even then, the "persecution" was very limited.
Jews lied about being persecuted just as they always do. Then the moment they got into power they began doing everything they imagined and more to the Europeans.
Anyone who refused to kneel to jewish rule, sorry "ride the wave of the future" was brutally suppressed.
Ei yii yii, where have you been skulking, Mr. Smith?
Yes. A perfect example of the mixed messaging in the new testament. The apostles are supposed to sell their cloaks for swords but Peter was wrong to use his. Blessed are the peacemakers but Yeshua has not come to bring peace.
The entire thing is a mishmash of conflicting stories and philosophies. Either he had multiple personality disorder or at least some of the stories are fiction.
Or he actually gave different advise depending on the circumstances.
So the sermon on the mount was just a circumstantial thing, and peacemakers aren't blessed all the time?
Peacemaker is not the same as total pacifist.
But they do bring peace, and are the opposite to someone who does not bring peace.
And pacifists generally don't succeed at bringing peace.
They are the same Jesus. The difference is that the peaceful Jesus messaging is needed on a personal level (for most people, most of the time), and the aggressive Jesus messaging is needed on a societal level. We've been at peace so long that the peaceful messaging has taken over almost completely, but that does not mean they are different messaging. Yin and Yang are two parts of the same whole.
If you have the I Ching, you really don't need 'The Bible'.
A major longterm goal of my substack is refuting that exact claim.
🤣
A few centuries ago Big Science and Big Religion teamed up to try and destroy magic, which is why mainstream Western Civilization is now a spiritual desert and reaching for the revolver of Communism to end it's own misery.
I like this. I'm not sure quite how to interpret this, but I like it.
We've come to the end of the enlightenment, and it turns out reality is way bigger that we could ever possibly hope to comprehend. Instead of admitting defeat we doubled down on rationalist materialism, tried to make the world fit our preconceived notions using technocratic totalitarianism, and drove ourselves insane.
We've just accepted their lies for long enough. It is high time to bring the lessons of our forefathers into the modern age.
Based Christian here. Great article and no offense taken. I have the same frustrations. Aside from online communities I have never met another based Christian IRL. And converting the feminized, chubby remnants of a once great faith is a fools errand. The men are long gone and are not coming back.
I find it very difficult to believe that the God of the universe wants me in a suicide pact, holding hands as the church building burns. Celebrating our abuse as evidence of our piety. Unwilling to identify our enemies and impose our will on anyone.
Something has definitely gone terribly wrong in the last hundred years or so and I long for the days when my White ancestors praised God for the sounds of guns, burned witches, castrated sodomites, and genocided baby-raping cannibal villages in mesoamerica. Those guys read the same Bible we do yet held few illusions as to their purpose on this earth.
When the Levitical World-Masters want their golems to conquer a continent for them, they dial up the "kill-the-Midianites" signal using Chringianity as their medium.
When their golems have served that purpose, and the continent is cleared and cultivated, the Levitical cult dials up the "meek-shall-inherit" signal, through the exact same medium.
That's the true purpose of the "mixed signals" in the Great Grimoire.....
In other words, Christians can use force when it is called for, and than maintain peace once force has done its job.
"In other words, Christians can use force when it is called for [by their Jewish masters], and than maintain peace once force has done its job [for the Jewish masters]."
Yep. Checks out.
Wow, these "Jewish Masters" sound like they're doing amazing work to promote civilization.
lol wtf Eugine, you fucked it here
Well Freelance was the one who conceptualized the functional influence of Christianity as "Jewish masters".
I suppose it must feel that way when you worship them and their god.
So would you prefer constant barbarian style war?
I’ve written about this many times. The New Testament is life-denying, comfort-denying, strength-denying, fertility-denying. Earthly life is something to be despised, cast away. It’s so different from the Okd Testament that the phrase “Judaeo-Christian” is oxymoronic.
In no way is it strength denying or fertility denying. The vast majority of Christians are intended by God to have many children. The glory of young men are their strength and physical training is of value.
The majority of Christians are non-White. You guys ignore the church we grew up in.
Welp, although Jesus went on about the sacred bond of marriage, He said nothing about reproduction. In fact, “blessed are the wombs that are barren,,the teats that never gave suck”. Yes I know that was a prophecy about the coming civil war, but it appears Jesus and the disciples thought they were living in the Last Days. Indeed you wouldn’t want to bear a child just in time for the great Tribulation.
We are living in a time period known as the Last Days and its true we dont know the time Christ will return. But as it says in 1 Tim 2: “Women will be saved through childbirth and continuing in the faith”. 1 Cor: “To the widows that are young, I encourage them to remarry and have children” These are not two different things. A woman who is continuing in the faith is one that will have children. A married woman not having children would be in disobedience to the order that God designed. Now this is often softened or not taught in todays church but it is clearly taught in the Bible.
I have noticed that among my friends and family its the Christians who are reproducing like rabbits while the non believers I know (who would be the ones who are mandated to reproduce) are darwinian dead ends.
I appreciate your pointing out those two comments. But St.Paul, even though he was writing earlier than the Gospel writers, was a practical guy who suggested many accommodations for which there doesn’t seem to be much support in Jesus’ words. For instance, his comments about temporal power, about which Jesus had nothing to say . And unlike Jesus, Paul’s comment about marriage (“Better to marry than to burn”) is the most tepid endorsement of wedded bliss ever.
I agree and I actually think that Paul is more marriage agnostic/less virile amongst the apostles. We know that Peter was married both before and after Jesus called him and sent him out. However this line of thinking that non-Christians tend to have misunderstands Christian doctrine.
1) The Bible has one author: God. Jehovah/God/the Great I AM is Father, Son, and Spirit.
2) He inspired (and even more than inspired but directly breathed) every word of the Bible. The prophets spoke many words in their life that were not God-breathed or infallible. But every word that God ordained to be recorded in the Bible as He divinely oversaw the compilation of the Bible was pure, perfect, and holy Truth, the literal Word of God.
3) Therefore the depth and multifacetedness of the Bible should never be mistaken as contradictions. Its God’s book for all people in all places for all time. The places and times might lead one to apply practical wisdom differently and from different parts of the Bible, while acknowledging the whole is Good and True just not every verse is equally applicable to your circumstance at that moment. God Himself also spiritually guides us through His Word and reveals application to us that stretches outside the exact scope of the text.
4) So Jesus wrote the Old Testament and the New. He speaks to us through every page. He enlightens our hearts and minds to understand the text, He alone unlocks it for the believer. The pattern of marriage and childbearing He gave at creation (the Creation Mandate) is in fact a command. He may personally convict some people over time to become monks or remain celibate, but the vast majority of people He intends to be fruitful and multiply. Read Jeremiah 29.
5) The most hardcore Christians have the most kids. The less fecund Christians on average are less committed (not all!). Clearly the devout Christians are doing so because they feel tasked by the Lord to do so. And they are correct. We are meant to live real lives with families, farms, and freedom. Not gay fake sterile consumerist cucked globohomo lives like the modern world is pushing on us.
Thank you for reading. Have a wonderful day, God bless, and may the right wing be victorious in our land
"Jesus wrote the Old Testament and the New. "
Wait...what?
Great Graves of the Gods you Jesuzoids are batshit.
Jesus had neither wife nor child. In fact, since the claim is that he had no 'earthly' father and hus stepfather accepted the role of a cuckold, there's not much 'normal' about Jesus' family life at all.
The Bible is a hodgepodge of contradiction and self-congratulatory jewish fables that with ravings of death and violence that have inspired so many 'messiahs' down through time. Like Jim Jones and Charlie Manson
The old testament was written by demon worshippers. And both religions are jewish.
Begone, Gnostic.
Swing and miss. Wrong again Disgene.
Oh great, another "Waahhh I'm mad at God!" screed. Your crisis of faith should be a personal matter between you and God. No need to childishly lash out at everyone else. Its embarrassing.
If christians wanted it to be a personal matter they wouldn't have infected the world with their decaying moral system.
As long as church ladies are donating to subsidize migrants, it's a very public problem.
Right, its the devout Christians who caused the decay in the moral system and not you atheists and Leftists. Brilliant take.
Thank God we have you here to shake your finger at the bad people. Attacking Christians, what an original concept! You are a true fucking hero.
The majority of the church is non-White and leftist. You are outnumbered and pick fights with pagans instead of the faggots who took over the church. I spend way more time arguing against faggot Christians than supposedly based ones, because the based ones are rare.
So have you spent any time arguing with the lefty neo-pagans, because there are a whole lot more of them than the based ones?
Yes, they are all over Twitter, and they show up to most cultural events like Highland Games. They are pussies and easy to defeat in arguments because they are pussies. There is no denying that folkish pagans are outnumbered by universalist pagans - but on the other hand there are no universalist organizations that have hofs, do food drives, and get together every month in multiple states and countries to do moots. None of them have families in their organizations like the pagan group I am a member of. There is no universalist organization that exists off the internet, basically.
Same with the based Christians, its mostly an online thing. You guys have no churches that I know about, no based pastors leading their congregations against the great satan. Every church I can go to in my state is mixed race and liberalized. If you do know any based churches Eugene, please start sharing them far and wide so your brethren know and can support them. Do you know of any based churches?
I know that sounds facetious, but I am being serious. You guys should try to spread based Churches around so they can grow. This is what I do with my organization, I tell people about it so it can grow.
> Right, its the devout Christians who caused the decay in the moral system
Yes actually. The "social gospel" was the trojan horse that started all this.
All in the tradition of the anxious commie dyke sufferagettes
You think that anyone who rejects your religion is having a crisis of faith or hates god?
Pure narcissism.
> You think that anyone who rejects your religion is having a crisis of faith or hates god?
Well, you clearly are.
None of the above.
Purely your projection.
Yes, I'm sure.
The Torah is based as all get out. Jesus endorsed Moses. What he deprecated was centuries of casuistry accumulated by the pharisees. Ron Paul is to Constitution was Jesus was to the Torah. (But Jesus has some other messages.)
In 30 AD, any armed resistance to the Roman Empire was doomed to fail unless you were the Persian Empire or Germans living in forests which gave Romans the willies. The way to overthrow pagan Rome was to create a shadow government which had better justice and a better welfare system that what the official state provided. See 1 Corinthians 5 and 6.
As for our current situation, it stems in large part from Christians outsourcing charity to governments and foundations. The solution to abortion and Obamacare is Church supported hospitals. These were once THE NORM. Notice how many hospitals (in the US at least) which have Christian names. Ditto for schools and universities.
Yes, Christians might need to draw the sword from time to time, but only AFTER doing the job of the church proves insufficient. (Any liberal preacher/priest who calls for government welfare needs to be reminded that government welfare is funded by the threat of violence. Calls for government welfare are not turning the other cheek, not by a long shot!)
Those "based jews" are destroying our people, and have been for centuries. Wokeism is nothing new, they've been like that from the start.
The Torah is a foreign religious text. You are a cuck. Just read the lessons of your forefathers.
My Episcopal preacher ancestor owned slaves. Kind of based.
Rather too based.
Work that should've gone to poor Whites.
Suntan lotion hadn't been invented yet.
Grok how far north Europe is. Rome -- which is in Southern Europe -- is at the same latitude as Chicago.
This article is full of errors. I don't expect the author to engage reasonably, but hopefully this clears things up for other readers.
First of all is the fact that you are watching a nation in decline carrying with it mass apostasy from the gospel. "Secret based Jesus" is the Jesus believed in by most Americans prior to the 1900s. You can pick a theologian at random and find people saying most of the same things, now considered "based" but then considered normal and obvious. Judging religion by its apostates is obviously wrong. American Christianity faced institutional decline. This is nothing new as its basically the story of the Old Testament - revitalization of religion under good leadership followed by decades or centuries of decline.
Second of all is the fact that Christianity has different horizons of focus, but it is primarily preoccupied with the relationship between God and man, broken by man's lack of holiness. You can find information about politics, wise living, prosperity, etc. in the Bible and it is all true, but the focus is on righting the relationship with God. As such you get different social dynamics in church. Sure, there are "losers" in the church, but this is largely because the church doesn't exist to rally the most competent troops to engage in a social revolution but to address the holiness problem.
Third, the reason people want to convert you is because they don't want you to go to Hell. If you go to Hell, it is your own fault, we don't like that it happened, but it's not like this is a personal problem to us. If we waited to try to evangelize people until the church was in perfect order, it would just mean that many people didn't hear the gospel and went to Hell.
Fourth, the process of fixing the decline in the church requires us to do the same kind of work. To expose and demolish the communist interpretations of Jesus and to promote the true Jesus. Yes, it is hard to find great churches. Ok, well that is only going to change with better leaders and better members, which we do incrementally. If your church sucks, going to Hell sucks even more.
1. The church most of us grew up in was liberalized, and I have not found a single church with a based pastor. The majority of Christians in the world are non-White. The church is ruined and has to be rebuilt. None of the based Christians are doing it. Those of us who escaped will continue to protect ourselves from the rot that took over the church. Besides, the rot existed all the way in Christ's time. We abandoned our forefathers for Abraham, and we name our kids David. We were cucked a long time ago.
2. Many of us do not believe in original sin. We do not think man is broken - he functions as he should, with the will to power and the meekness of slaves. Natural law rules mankind, and we embrace the struggle of life, seeking arete and erdathe.
3. Hell is from the Germanic and Norse Hel, and its cold and not permanent. You mean the jewish Sheol or Gehanna.
4. Or, you can form your own kindred around your local community and focus on fixing things close to home, with your kindred. Why focus on a dying church that is mostly non-White at this point?
> We do not think man is broken
That is the belief that allowed for leftism to take over.
I'm pretty sure it was "there is no jew or greek" and "all are one under God" and "all humans come from Adam and Eve" type of rhetoric, brother. We were Christian when we started accepting kikes into our cities, and Christian when the liberal revolutionaries destroyed the monarchies. I don't recall either group arguing that man is perfect.
> I'm pretty sure it was "there is no jew or greek" and "all are one under God" and "all humans come from Adam and Eve" type of rhetoric, brother.
Those existed for nearly two millennia without leftist take over.
It was only after the belief that man is broken was abandoned that things when sideways.
The problem is that man *is* broken, even the pagans you seek to LARP as knew that. And that therefore one must seek to rise above one's brokenness, otherwise one will fall into the abyss on seeking to fulfill one's every impulsive desire. There's a reason leftists sought to tell kids that "you're perfect just the way you are".
Ok Eugine
Really funny to be accused of being a Jew.
Sorry to break it to you but you don't know that something that is true is false. God commands you to believe in Jesus because he is true, not as an act of the will.
If this God apparently bestowed upon humanity our intellect and rationality, why would that rationality go out the window when it comes to believing? Just commanding people to believe just because he said so? It basically just a big "trust me, bro".
It doesn't. God doesn't ask you to reject rationality.
You don't seem to have a dispassionate interest in the truth.
I agree with the sentiments of this article. Bullets are always a winning argument.
> Maybe if you're in a dissident Mormon polygamist sect, ignore all the above, I'll accept that your group might not just be in a holding pattern waiting to be devoured by Jesus-Lennon Globohomo
ex-mormon here.... I dont see salvation here either
Even the polygamists are necessarily pro-Jew since Joseph Smith was, and definitely not race realist.
.... huh?
The mormon chruch taught that the "mark of caine" was black skin Im pretty sure they were race realists; the real issue is that at least 3 of them were pedophiles(pls do not attempt to start a religion law age of consent debate @ me)
True, they believed the complete nonsense that three races emerged from the flood via Shem, Ham (negroes), and Japeth, but that implies so much lack of understanding of human groups as to be, well, crazy, at this point.
The true essence of Christianity to me is Kony 2012.
Were they christian though?
Jason Russell most certainly is
Fair enough, I wasn't aware.
They certainly have a white saviour complex.
As I like to point out, the super-ultra-esoteric-alchemical-hermetist-mystic-based-solar—Christianity is a minority of a minority. All of these guys act like priests. I call them Religion Guys. Their work, personality and presence is oriented around over-theoryceling on theology while not combining it with proselytism or organization. None of these people would ever think about starting their own denomination, or breaking away from the papacy and doing what SSPX did, and this is desperately needed for Protestants and Catholics.
More than half of the United States identifies as Christian, yet only 24% of those Christians attend church weekly — of those in weekly church attendance how many are apolitical, centre-right leaning neocon, Zionist and self sabotaging. How many are infected with the DEI heresy? These guys are alone, and they fabricate their legitimacy by grafting their views to the raw numbers of Christians and pretend to have consensus.
This is no different than reconstructionist pagans. They may follow the objectively truest version of Christianity, but it’s them who are the larpers attempting to piece together a broken tradition, while they accuse everyone else of the same.
As long as you think only in terms of what is useful, what will bring you and yours power or whatever it is that you want, you will still be no different than the moderns and the liberals. Also, no different than your real or imagined wotanist ancestor.
When you care only for what is true, when you stop looking for Based Jesus or Chad Jesus or whatever then you will find something that doesn't disappoint.
lmao
Truth is not to be found in jewish books. They live in a web of lies.