71 Comments
User's avatar
SirTophamHatt's avatar

Blackpillers don’t want to put pressure on the Trump regime to go further and give us the policies we supported him for - everyone wants that, and to posit otherwise is nothing but a strawman.

What the blackpillers do is tell you that the enemy elite is all powerful, and therefore victory through the means that have worked historically (for example, the rise of a stronger counter elite) is axiomatically impossible so you shouldn’t even TRY to get anything from Trump because you’re just going to be betrayed. This position is, ironically, far more subversive than what you’re accusing the Trump-trusters of, and they deserve every bit of the scorn they receive.

Expand full comment
Servetus's avatar

What do you consider black-pilling? I see quite clearly that roughly the same band of elites are all in the Trump cadre: the technocrats, Israel, mega corps, central banks, most all the familiar faces. is it black pilling to point out that only a minor reshuffle of elite factions has taken place, and that they've mostly succeeded in skinsuiting the Trump administration? The truth is that as long as we still have this same political system nothing significant will change. Real change demands sacrifice and a total restructuring of our government, society, and economy. As long as there's a central bank printing monopoly money you're not free and your government is not working for you. But people would rather believe Trump or whoever else will work from within to save them, which is just hopium and is already not looking likely.

Expand full comment
Heidi Kulcheski's avatar

I think that expecting a complete victory after only 27 days in is a bit silly. I see both sides, not sure how it plays out but this essay is as defeatist as what it portends against.

Expand full comment
Servetus's avatar

It's pretty dark and harsh but I think that's necessary to an extent to jolt people awake. The part I can't agree with and say is truly black-pilling is the anti-christ sentiment. Without God it truly is all hopeless and an accurate telling of events.

Expand full comment
Sim1776's avatar

Yeah the "roll over and surrender" types are the worst. The future belongs to those who will fight for it.

Expand full comment
Wizard's avatar

I am unaware of the anti Trump dissident right saying the elite is all powerful, or a counter elite is impossible, we call out Trump on his loyalty to an overtly hostile entity(zog) and the pharmaceutical industrial complex.

We are more than capable of giving Trumpstien credit were credit is due, but we also give discredit were discredit is due. Unlike trumpenproles.

Expand full comment
Fabius Minarchus's avatar

You are half right. We in the US should scream bloody murder whenever Trump or his team cucks. We did so over H-1B visas, and it was good.

But we also should cheer our leadership when they are on a roll, and Trump is.

The Left does that too. Look at all the Obama worship and the HOPE signs.

The other thing the Left does well is love-bombing those who switch sides. Trump turning the heat off of Mayor Adams and commuting sentences of corrupt Democrats of the past is playing this game masterfully. It is the same game the Democrats played to turn John McCain into a malleable squish. Prior to the Keaton 5 scandal, McCain had been pretty conservative.

Need to play both Good Cop and Bad Cop.

Expand full comment
BigOinSeattle's avatar

I see your point but I also am somewhat confused about the Adams situation. What will Trump get out of it? What will our people get from him going soft on a corrupt black mayor? Does Trump have some sort of a kinship with a fellow crypto grifter? Or is he playing 8D chess again? 😁

Expand full comment
SirTophamHatt's avatar

I don’t understand all the mystery around Trump’s pardoning of Adams. Does the fact that he’s suddenly playing nice with right-wing media and ordering NYC law enforcement to cooperate with DHS/ICE deportation efforts despite NY’s official status as a “sanctuary city” seem like a coincidence to you?

Trump is clearly signaling to other mid-level Democrat operatives that all they have to do is play ball with the new administration and their past participation in the grift will be overlooked, thereby incentivizing further defections. If he chose to go the other route and punish leftist defectors by isolating them and making an example out of them, he’d only be encouraging the rest to double down on their Democrat loyalties. All this is basic game theory and it’s honestly incredible (not in a good way!) that anyone who considers themselves a political realist could fail to recognize this for what it is.

Expand full comment
BigOinSeattle's avatar

Good answer, maybe I am the one being obtuse here and overthinking it.

Expand full comment
Fabius Minarchus's avatar

Trump splits the Democratic Party. Right now, Team D is full on Borg. Anyone who cooperates with Trump get the lawfare treatment or other form of Cancellation.

And besides, by the time Doge is done digging up corruptions, Adams is going to look clean by comparison with Congress.

Expand full comment
BigOinSeattle's avatar

I hope that works! Trump’s last term consisted largely of treating his enemies fairly and then they would not return the favor. Many of the non neocon employees were fired. He seems to have more purpose now but it would be nice to have him mention white people and say fuck you to Elon and his H1Bs. I’m sick of that overgrown bloated degenerate crack baby face and I think Trump will be sick of him before long because he’s bound to screw up and make a mistake that the boss can’t ignore. Something really embarrassing.

Expand full comment
Chuck Connor's avatar

What was the outcome of the h1b backlash exactly ?

Expand full comment
John Smith's avatar

Vivek got shitcanned. Elon stayed put but he's not in a position to touch immigration so it's irrelevant.

Expand full comment
Fabius Minarchus's avatar

Elon backed down a bit. Maybe not enough.

Meanwhile, Vivek is pretty much out of the picture.

Expand full comment
Chuck Connor's avatar

But was there any policy decision made about h1b yet?

Expand full comment
Rex's avatar

You're assuming that that will turn these Democrats into rolling over and seeing the error of their ways. John McCain wasn't a Democrat.

Expand full comment
Fabius Minarchus's avatar

Bill Clinton turned and declared "The era of Big Government is over." Bill Clinton signed off on harsher welfare reforms than Reagan was able to pass.

Rush Limbaugh whined about Bill Clinton "stealing our ideas."

That's how to lose.

Expand full comment
Roy0501's avatar

A content creator I used to regularly listen to, and who was excellent, is now consistently makes videos telling people to "stop black Pilling" . Even the slightest criticism of Trump is drowned out with cult-like retorts and attacks on those daring to critique any policy of Trump. Pathetic

Expand full comment
Defier of Gravity's avatar

“Stop black pilling” is how RW influencers silence dissenting opinions these days.

Expand full comment
Roy0501's avatar

True, and while we have to take little victories when we can, it doesn't mean we should be happy about the situation. I read a great article on SS the other day which stated that the progressives never tell each other to stop black-pilling and because of this they are never satisfied with the situation and constantly demand change from their elected leaders.

Expand full comment
BigOinSeattle's avatar

You’re probably talking about PQ whom I still like for his deep dives but he is too desperate for a Trump W I agree

Expand full comment
Peter R. Quiñones's avatar

That's all you're hearing. When have i ever said Trump would solve everything?

Expand full comment
BigOinSeattle's avatar

I’m not saying you did. We should take Ws and at least use the breathing room. I am guilty of gloom and despair sometimes and appreciate your response. But maga people are sometimes retards. The crypto grift is a perfect example. Trump’s critics are focused on the wrong things in my opinion.

Expand full comment
John Smith's avatar

Sounds like Razorfist.

He's entertaining but far too easily pleased.

Expand full comment
old coyote's avatar

Good stuff. Tirades and rants are necessary to wake people up, some may be offended. so what. Your take on the <35 yr olds is really real. But ... my granddaughter calls herself a conservative, covers herself in tats on her overfed bod and is all offended when i call out the cheetojesus waiting on the jew like a waiter at his table. And her hubby is a total cuck.

Expand full comment
Zorost's avatar

Brilliant.

99% agree, and the 1% is what seems to be the assumption that we can vote our way out of this. Fighting an unwinnable electoral fight can at least show us who our allies are, and who is most competent amongst us to lead. But short of local and regional coalitions doing what needs to be done, or an Act of God Great Reset, we are not going to get on a winning trajectory.

Currently I'm exulting at the wails and lamentations and increased rate of self-mutilation amongst our enemies, but I'm also preparing myself and my neighbors for post-2028. Either Vance or similar wins and continues to replace banker-globalist neoliberals with techbro-globalist neoliberals, or the libtards get back in charge and go apeshit to make sure Whitey never gets uppity again.

Expand full comment
Vlajdermen's avatar

Hate the people who hate you. Simple as. Until we're prepared to say Europe and North America are for whites only, we'll never win. Yes I'm pushing this as dogma. As soon as you get into reasoning over IQ or height or religion other bullshit, that's a rabbit hole you can go down until you come back where you started.

White love white - because he's white, and no other reason.

I'm for self-victimization as long as it works, but ultimately, having the tool of mocking, degrading, and dehumanizing nonwhites will be a smart move. You don't want those violent fent-addled mexicans around. You don't want those insecure sadomasochistic japs around. You don't want those belligerent ugly arabs around. As soon as you accept any non-white as your equal, or God forbid, your superior, you're back down the same road again. ANY non-white. ANY. No ifs ands or buts.

Love what you have. Protect what you were given. Tend to your own garden. As long as there's any threat, attack it in any way that works.

Expand full comment
Canadian Hell's avatar

Important to keep in mind that Trump is before, after and always an optics man, his deal with New Yorks nig*er mayor is to pump up his optics in the deportation numbers game, as long as his good optics are taking the knee off of white America's neck, and he's not counter signaling anyone right of him actively "which to his credit, I haven't seen any rightward punching" it is good. But Kulak is right, democracy punishes virtue and rewards vice, so as long as this is the case, loyalty is something we must not have for any so called leader.

Expand full comment
Terminus's avatar

"Being a "team player" biting your tongue, being "optimistic" is how you wind up being the loser of the coalition who supplies all the political energy and winds up undercut with nothing while every special interest gets what they wants." This phrase reminded me when at the engagement interview, Harry said about Meghan that she was going to be a great team player, and she just quenched her jaw and looked away. Two years fast-forward and she wrecked his family to ashes, got a huge mansion where she wanted, and on top of it made interviews, podcasts, Netflix series and a book to make a business out of destroying their reputation. One can undeniably say that she was the Winner up to now?

Expand full comment
BigOinSeattle's avatar

Partly right but the incompetent narcissist like Meghan is never satisfied, thriving on drama and ultimately self destructive. Note that Netflix and Spotify want nothing to do with Harry or Megan now…

Expand full comment
Terminus's avatar

Why do you say that Netflix does not want to do anything with them? Just last month Meghan is doing a cooking show on Netflix

Expand full comment
BigOinSeattle's avatar

It’s going nowhere, maybe it’s in the contract but she is about as appealing as nails on a chalkboard. There won’t be another season.

Expand full comment
Liberty Uncensored Newspaper's avatar

Yup.

People are lazy and stupid, manipulated and indoctrinated.

No inspiration or direction to do what is necessary, only platitudes and nonsensical rhetoric to mislead and procrastinate and excuse.

Real action requires real leadership.

The real leaders get assassinated before they take a few steps.

I don't see real action occurring until it's too late for the majority.

Expand full comment
Zorost's avatar

National leaders are a no-go for us for just that reason. Local and regional is about the best we can hope for. Get to know your neighbors...

Expand full comment
Leo's avatar

I subscribe to your site to get insightful exposure to views I do not hold, and I support free expression, but to me you to often cross a line. No matter how much I may agree with the second half of the quote below, I do not feel you have to use blanket slurs and terms like "diversity mystery meat" to get there.

This quote is typical: "This is why neurotic women, blacks, Jews, the disabled, sexual degenerates, and the various diversity mystery meat are all net tax receivers whilst you cling to the title "Taxpayer" as if there is some pride in being a serf who is eternally robbed and fails to fight for your children."

I will keep reading, but it is getting more difficult to give credence to your words.

Expand full comment
Kulak's avatar

What is your age?

Literally every single white person under the age of 35 has heard worse from their own teachers and professors. White children hear language like this directed at them and their families in kindergartens now.

Everyone listed claims to be my equal, an equal citizen, and an equal adult to be taken seriously. Therefore they can suffer equal insults and equal attacks on their identity.

Here you are all equally worthless.

Expand full comment
ReadingRainbow's avatar

Can you run your shit through a spell check before posting? People will cling to a typo to dismiss an entire argument.

Expand full comment
Kulak's avatar

If someone wants to dismiss an argument they'll do it anyway.

The purpose of rhetoric isn't to persuade your enemies, it's to radicalize your alleles.

Expand full comment
BigOinSeattle's avatar

I see what you did there! 😂 great article, brutal but true

Expand full comment
Vlajdermen's avatar

It can also persuade enemies of weak faith, or win over neutrals. There also exists rhetoric to shake the faith of the enemy, though it doesn't work on everyone. It works the best when it's tailor made for the individual. The best way to win people over to your side is good old fashioned hard power. Me have bigger stick, ooga booga. Anyhoo when someone can't find any better refutation than a typo, his faith is likely already weak.

Expand full comment
Zorost's avatar

Where is the lie?

Expand full comment
John Smith's avatar

Can you explain what part of the quote is inaccurate?

Globalists deliberately gather useless leeches around them because leeches are dependent and therefore loyal.

Instead of asking yourself whether you should give credence to someone who insults the leeches, maybe you should ask why you're giving credence to the leeches themselves?

Expand full comment
Vlajdermen's avatar

For anyone claiming that self-victimizing doesn't work, remember that the country that self-victimizes the most over the damage done by communism - is Hungary. Say what you will about them, but they remember their history, and we all stand to learn a lot from them.

Expand full comment
B K's avatar

At a level deeper than narrative, the will to live is the will to fight is the will to kill. What you keep is something that someone else goes without. Life sustained is life stolen. No hands are clean.

Our primeval ancestors fought, tooth and nail if need be, to tend their life's flame and pass it forward through the generations. Until recent times.

I suspect that the only lasting revitalization will occur after a population collapse, the rudest of awakenings.

Trump does seem to be pushing against the general entropy, but you're correct that nothing has been fixed as yet.

Expand full comment
T Armstrong's avatar

"How are we better than them?"

Because of why we fight, not how we fight

Expand full comment
Rogue / Frontier Philosophy's avatar

The focus of the movement is to:

"accept their lord and Savior Donald Trump into your heart and fully embrace MAGA as some joyful "good news” Irrespective of whether anything, let alone enough, gets achieved."

This absolutely ridiculous notion that the man who promoted Operation Warp Speed as a means to genocide his own people via bioweapons will magically choose to save them is absurd.

Worse, he has already stated that he will destroy our tradition of radical free speech by anti-semitism laws.

We must not mistake an enemy for a friend. Trump and the remainder of the controlled opposition, be they Elon or RFK, all seek the extermination of our folk. Worse, the lesser caste "on our side" who demand to live as slaves to some god, any god, will happilly support their own demise, and, by extension, our own. Fools.

Expand full comment
Retired's avatar

Have babies. Teach them about Jesus Christ. And love your neighbor as you love yourselves. God is not dead. When St. Peter told a Jewish crowd about the death of Christ “they were cut to the heart and asked what to do.” He told them to get baptized, whereupon 3000 were baptized that day. This is the issue we are facing, being on the short end of the stick as for nearly 2000 years Christendom kept the Jews from running their societies. That didn’t reverse by their stubborn resistance alone, but by our turning from what made the West the shining city on a hill. The English and their acceptance of Judaized Christianity has been the suicidal pact that destroys the true faith which allowed reason and moral order to prevail. The British leaders have equaled the perfidy of the Jews, and while they project outward strength they are on a short timeline of existence because they are internally weak and corrupt.

Expand full comment
John Smith's avatar

As much as I agree about democracy being godawful, I think you're lionising monarchies too much: Many monarchies were also whirlwinds of whining courtiers and scheming jews. In the end pretty much every monarchy sought to replace it's native population with more compliant ones.

Expand full comment