Short Take: "Anti-Discrimination" is Just Communism via Race Guilting
Note: "Short Takes" are short essays I write up in a rage or fit of autism. They don't/shouldn’t impact the rate at which my longer content comes out.
"Anti-Discrimination" is the belief you do not have the right to discriminate on the basis of race, sex, religion or sexual orientation/gender identity, even on your own property or in your own business. The remedy is lawsuits and the loss of property.
OK how do they know you've discriminated?
Sure you might say something racist or sexist, but more likely than not, you just don't hire someone, or don't promote someone, or don't take on a client...
How is the court to know?
This is where DISPARATE IMPACT assessments come in.
If there is an inequality between groups in your hiring, not enough of X or Y are represented.... that is treated as smoking gun evidence of your covert discrimination, and not even your documented intentions can count as evidence in your favour...
Ie. If any inequality exists between any groups, at all... a condition that will hold in all places at all time... your property can be violated and confiscated by the state to redistribute.
Anti-Discrimination is the idea that any property of anyone can be redistributed at any time to address "inequality" ie. Communism.
And boomercons are such cucks, such cowards, that when communism came knocking to straight up void all property rights in the whole of America... They rolled over and insisted they weren't racist.
Even the boomer conception of "Anti-Discrimination" that your property can be taken from you if you explicitly say the N-Word to a job applicant or say that "Blacks need not apply" is a systematic nullification of First Amendment free speech, freedom of Association, and basic property rights.
Think about it, you’re a small business owner, it is 100% your store, 100% your money, and 100% your effort that produced both… And yet if you don’t hire a black person to entrust what might be your life’s savings to for the night shift, or HEAVEN FORBID, when they insist you hire them, you call them a racial slur and tell them to get the F off your property… suddenly they can sue you, for not giving them your money and entrusting them for entire shifts straight with your life’s work.
It is not your store, it’s their store. Or rather, it’s the government’s store.
If the federal government can take your property for telling someone of a different color to fuck off you don't want to pay their kind to work for you... then you have no free speech rights, no association rights, no property rights, and... since two private persons merely exchanging harsh words and NOT engaging in a transaction is just about the smallest non-event conceivable in a nation of 330 million... no separation of powers or local independence at all.
The "Civil Rights" movement was a communist coup that voided all American property rights, speech rights, political rights, and constitutional divisions of power, in favour of an all powerful, unaccountable federal bureaucracy that need respect none of them.
And boomercons and “bleeding heart libertarians” are such traitors to the republic, the American people, and the constitution, they cannot stop falling over themselves to praise the communist funded arch-traitor who made it happen.
If America ever restored its republic and constitution... Martin Luther King would not have a statue on the Washington mall, but rather his grave would be dug up and his head placed on a pike before the Capital building such as Charles II did to Oliver Cromwell when Cromwell's usurperous government fell.
Anarchonomicon is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
Follow me on Twitter: @FromKulak
Follow me on Twitter: @FromKulak