The US is not a nation. It's an empire containing enemy nations. Any group that wants to use deadly force to take from you massive reparations is YOUR ENEMY. It's common for there to be personal friendships between enemy groups, but the groups remain ENEMIES
77% of US blacks favor government-enforced reparations in a 2021 Pew poll, but my statement applies to socialists of all races, & immigrants who resent that they don't belong
Your advocacy for violence is kind of cathartic. I’ve always raised and eyebrow as to why it is “absolutely reprehensible” to do violence against journalists and politicians, in particular, when I could make the argument that they are the most destructive forces around (other than the implied forces in your article).
The multicultural kids literature they pump out is sickening. Ontario has to be the worst place in Canada for that.
Many boomers out in the sticks don't even realize how bad the cities are. When they hear people complain. The boom booms think it is just about a few neighborhoods.
"Hate the sin, not the sinner" is a ubiquitous modern Christian slogan. It's Biblical, but not perfectly Biblical. The Bible leaves room for people to repent of the sin that makes them hate-worthy, but the Bible models hate for those who are in flagrant revolt at the moment.
Psalm 31:6 ESV - I hate those who pay regard to worthless idols, but I trust in the LORD.
Psalm 139:21,22 ESV - Do I not hate those who hate you, O LORD? And do I not loathe those who rise up against you? I hate them with complete hatred; I count them my enemies.
And God knows who will not repent:
Malachi 1:2-4 ESV But you say, “How have you loved us?” “Is not Esau Jacob's brother?” declares the Lord. “Yet I have loved Jacob 3 but Esau I have hated. I have laid waste his hill country and left his heritage to jackals of the desert.” 4 If Edom says, “We are shattered but we will rebuild the ruins,” the Lord of hosts says, “They may build, but I will tear down, and they will be called ‘the wicked country,’ and ‘the people with whom the Lord is angry forever.’”
Matthew 5 is from the Sermon on the Mount, which is meant to present an image of unobtainable personal holiness intended to drive men to despair that they can achieve salvation without Christ's forgiveness. It's not meant to be counsel on how a government should act.
Also, my own local pastor is almost as extreme-right as you are, even in the pulpit, so don't act like they're all the same
It’s a long essay, and I can’t say I agree with some of your illustrations of your point. BUT, I DO so agree about hatred. I’ve written about this frequently.
Yes, we should judge what other people do, and if what they do is repulsive, unnatural, disgusting or threatening—
We should HATE them.
We see these lawn signs all over the place:”Hate has no home here”. I’d like one that says. “Hate HAS a home here.”
(But I’ll defend my generation—because I do not think the way you seem to think we all do—
and I’ll take the opposite side on Gaza. “Genocide”? Do not make me laugh. Y’ever compare how many Arabs there are in the world vs. how many Jews? And have you noticed the fake starvation pictures Hamas is putting up—along with the ones bragging about their ill-treatment of their hostages? )
And I agree with you that white children are being taught suicidal self-hatred.
So…I’ll keep my subscription, for a while, on balance.
LOL I tried not to really take a side on Gaza in this piece, I'm more referring to how Jarring it is to hear some anti-war guy insist it's a genocide... then get really concerned about white people's emotions about it... as if the emotional state of some non-combatants in Kansas is the real danger.
I way more grumpy about Epstein... although many Likud types insist that's an Ehud Barak Labor Zionist legacy communist plot.
.
I actually need to write a piece on Hamas's strategy... They're copying and taking to the logical conclusion a lot of the Viet Kong tactics and propaganda, remarkably cynical in a way few would notice...
It's nothing but desert people killing desert people, in the desert. As they've done for 5,000 years and will continue to do for another 5,000 years after the oil runs out. Fuck all of them, and keep all of them over there in the desert.
"You talk to damn much for a fighting man." - Bob Dalton
But that don't mean you're wrong. - me
"LOVE, the natural, healthy kind, is indeed what makes the world go round, and is the most beautiful, holy miracle we ever see here on this earth. BUT WITHOUT A DEADLY HATE OF THAT WHICH THREATENS WHAT WE LOVE, LOVE IS AN EMPTY WORD, A CATCHWORD FOR HIPPIES, QUEERS, AND COWARDS."
Love your work. Love this essay especially. But I want to make what I hope is constructive criticism - about your typos. I got this essay in an email, read it, and noticed lots of typos. Then I went to the website to comment, rescanned the essay, and most but not all of the typos were gone. So, maybe you ran it through a spell checker before posting it here. But I still found the following typos even on this substack:
Selcular Alawites
embarassedly
deadicated
Netenyahu
fronteir
desparaging
wilful
Wiemar Republic
Gertrune and Claudius
comntemplate suicide
gullotine
severe ties (sever)
its bullshit (it's)
hate each-other
Proffessorships
Forth generation
their ancestors victories (ancestors')
'“love”
Mengela
Heydricht
devote (devout)
to the the best
flatters (flatterers)
thousands conflict (thousands of conflicts)
Also, I follow you on X. I find your tweet typos distracting. There ought to be an easy way to eliminate them. For instance: Type them into Microsoft Word. See the red marks that flag typos and bad grammar. Fix the problems. Copy the resulting text into X. Just a suggestion.
The US is not a nation. It's an empire containing enemy nations. Any group that wants to use deadly force to take from you massive reparations is YOUR ENEMY. It's common for there to be personal friendships between enemy groups, but the groups remain ENEMIES
77% of US blacks favor government-enforced reparations in a 2021 Pew poll, but my statement applies to socialists of all races, & immigrants who resent that they don't belong
The Bible warns that guests (or immigrants) will murderously resent the host (or host culture), because they want what he has.
So much so, that this parable appears in 3 of the 4 Gospels:
Matthew 21:38 - But when the tenants saw the son, they said to themselves, ‘This is the heir. Come, let us kill him and have his inheritance.’
Mark 12:7 - But those tenants said to one another, ‘This is the heir. Come, let us kill him, and the inheritance will be ours.’
Luke 20:14 - But when the tenants saw him, they said to themselves, ‘This is the heir. Let us kill him, so that the inheritance may be ours.’
Your advocacy for violence is kind of cathartic. I’ve always raised and eyebrow as to why it is “absolutely reprehensible” to do violence against journalists and politicians, in particular, when I could make the argument that they are the most destructive forces around (other than the implied forces in your article).
Kipling:
The Beginnings
It was not part of their blood,
It came to them very late
With long arrears to make good,
When the English began to hate.
They were not easily moved,
They were icy-willing to wait
Till every count should be proved,
Ere the English began to hate.
Their voices were even and low,
Their eyes were level and straight.
There was neither sign nor show,
When the English began to hate.
It was not preached to the crowd,
It was not taught by the State.
No man spoke it aloud,
When the English began to hate.
It was not suddenly bred,
It will not swiftly abate,
Through the chill years ahead,
When Time shall count from the date
That the English began to hate.
The multicultural kids literature they pump out is sickening. Ontario has to be the worst place in Canada for that.
Many boomers out in the sticks don't even realize how bad the cities are. When they hear people complain. The boom booms think it is just about a few neighborhoods.
Plus the GD CBC, doesn't help much either.
If you do not hate that which threatens what you love, you do not truly love.
Es ist Zeit für Rache
Awesome essay, Kulak!
"Hate the sin, not the sinner" is a ubiquitous modern Christian slogan. It's Biblical, but not perfectly Biblical. The Bible leaves room for people to repent of the sin that makes them hate-worthy, but the Bible models hate for those who are in flagrant revolt at the moment.
Psalm 31:6 ESV - I hate those who pay regard to worthless idols, but I trust in the LORD.
Psalm 139:21,22 ESV - Do I not hate those who hate you, O LORD? And do I not loathe those who rise up against you? I hate them with complete hatred; I count them my enemies.
And God knows who will not repent:
Malachi 1:2-4 ESV But you say, “How have you loved us?” “Is not Esau Jacob's brother?” declares the Lord. “Yet I have loved Jacob 3 but Esau I have hated. I have laid waste his hill country and left his heritage to jackals of the desert.” 4 If Edom says, “We are shattered but we will rebuild the ruins,” the Lord of hosts says, “They may build, but I will tear down, and they will be called ‘the wicked country,’ and ‘the people with whom the Lord is angry forever.’”
Matthew 5 is from the Sermon on the Mount, which is meant to present an image of unobtainable personal holiness intended to drive men to despair that they can achieve salvation without Christ's forgiveness. It's not meant to be counsel on how a government should act.
Also, my own local pastor is almost as extreme-right as you are, even in the pulpit, so don't act like they're all the same
Hate is the extreme form of intolerance, and therefore the enemy of the zeitgeist of our society, the Open Society that's been funded by the likes of George Soros. https://hermeneutics.stackexchange.com/questions/43607/why-did-god-hate-esau-from-the-womb-when-he-had-done-no-evil
It’s a long essay, and I can’t say I agree with some of your illustrations of your point. BUT, I DO so agree about hatred. I’ve written about this frequently.
Yes, we should judge what other people do, and if what they do is repulsive, unnatural, disgusting or threatening—
We should HATE them.
We see these lawn signs all over the place:”Hate has no home here”. I’d like one that says. “Hate HAS a home here.”
(But I’ll defend my generation—because I do not think the way you seem to think we all do—
and I’ll take the opposite side on Gaza. “Genocide”? Do not make me laugh. Y’ever compare how many Arabs there are in the world vs. how many Jews? And have you noticed the fake starvation pictures Hamas is putting up—along with the ones bragging about their ill-treatment of their hostages? )
And I agree with you that white children are being taught suicidal self-hatred.
So…I’ll keep my subscription, for a while, on balance.
LOL I tried not to really take a side on Gaza in this piece, I'm more referring to how Jarring it is to hear some anti-war guy insist it's a genocide... then get really concerned about white people's emotions about it... as if the emotional state of some non-combatants in Kansas is the real danger.
I way more grumpy about Epstein... although many Likud types insist that's an Ehud Barak Labor Zionist legacy communist plot.
.
I actually need to write a piece on Hamas's strategy... They're copying and taking to the logical conclusion a lot of the Viet Kong tactics and propaganda, remarkably cynical in a way few would notice...
It's nothing but desert people killing desert people, in the desert. As they've done for 5,000 years and will continue to do for another 5,000 years after the oil runs out. Fuck all of them, and keep all of them over there in the desert.
Love is the mother of Hate, and the son will always defends his mother.
"You talk to damn much for a fighting man." - Bob Dalton
But that don't mean you're wrong. - me
"LOVE, the natural, healthy kind, is indeed what makes the world go round, and is the most beautiful, holy miracle we ever see here on this earth. BUT WITHOUT A DEADLY HATE OF THAT WHICH THREATENS WHAT WE LOVE, LOVE IS AN EMPTY WORD, A CATCHWORD FOR HIPPIES, QUEERS, AND COWARDS."
George Lincoln Rockwell, White Power
Love your work. Love this essay especially. But I want to make what I hope is constructive criticism - about your typos. I got this essay in an email, read it, and noticed lots of typos. Then I went to the website to comment, rescanned the essay, and most but not all of the typos were gone. So, maybe you ran it through a spell checker before posting it here. But I still found the following typos even on this substack:
Selcular Alawites
embarassedly
deadicated
Netenyahu
fronteir
desparaging
wilful
Wiemar Republic
Gertrune and Claudius
comntemplate suicide
gullotine
severe ties (sever)
its bullshit (it's)
hate each-other
Proffessorships
Forth generation
their ancestors victories (ancestors')
'“love”
Mengela
Heydricht
devote (devout)
to the the best
flatters (flatterers)
thousands conflict (thousands of conflicts)
Also, I follow you on X. I find your tweet typos distracting. There ought to be an easy way to eliminate them. For instance: Type them into Microsoft Word. See the red marks that flag typos and bad grammar. Fix the problems. Copy the resulting text into X. Just a suggestion.